Right near the Thames, huh?

Nicely done.

Interesting.

This is also not far from the location to which I believe to be L's house (NOTE: THIS ISN'T THE HOUSE IN THE PICTURE THAT SHE TOOK THAT SAYS 'my house'!!! THIS IS ONE WHICH I MATCHED UP THE TREES IN THE PICTURES SHE TOOK LOOKING OUT OF HER HOUSE AND WITH TREES IN REFLECTIONS OF WINDOWS AND SCREENS AND THIS IS NOT STALKING). I just might post the coords to it in awhile.

Good find anon. It is a 100% match. Also you can see a dumpster that looks like the one in the photos in a field to the south-east.

>>1
Red roof (picture), grey roof (map). I don't think it's a match. Nice try, though.

>>4

It's the same color on the map. It's the exact place. You must be looking at the wrong area.

Nice find Anonymous.

>>3

Whoa, slow down there, Mr. Guilty.

>>3

LOL LOL LOL

not stalking? o reery?

OP here,

>>3 I may have found the location too. If I may ask for confirmation, what direction is it from 51.746237 -1.25571?

Nice find >>7.

>>9, I think you need to look up the term \'stalking\'.

>>10

It's just South of those coords.

/r/ a screenshot of where the house is.

>>12

Suede that's not the building. The building we are looking at is the little island thing across the river. I'll post the coords to the house in a bit after I do some more matching.

>>3 are you talking about this picture?

>>13
Ah yes, I see. My mistake.

I suppose this means I finally get to organise a day-trip to Oxford soon. Awesome.

>>14

Yes.

Fuck it. I can't seem to get a match. I based this off the foliage, structure of the house, distances from locations, etc.

51.712667, -1.250357

This coordinate is based off of Google Maps not Virtual Earth. The actual house is NW of the coordinate (red + white car in driveway). Seems to be the only place for it to be located around in Oxford based off of the pine trees.

Someone go there and knock on the door. Cracky may answer.

Now to find a CAL scrim.

Good luck and have fun. Match is now LIVE!

ITT: Spare time to the max.

>>17

I see we found the same house.

>>17
This one? It isn't a match.

>>20

Yeah. But look around the area. Compare it with >>14.

>>21

Well it has to be around that area that you posted because that is the only area that has fur/pine trees in peoples yards (based upon >>14). And the houses to the south of Oxford are where the rich people live.

I will say though that the house that you found is somewhat a match but sadly it isn't.

>>20
>>21

Aimpoint, lulz. I see why you use that name. Creepy stalker, or creepiest stalker?

>>21
I'm no arboreal expert, but it looks like a tree blocking the view. They tend to look like that. There's plenty of other places near oxford with trees near houses or in gardens.

>>24
Agreed. I don't see how one can claim to match anything from Google Earth et al with No. 14. There is too limited a view and too different a perspective in that picture to match it to a tree or trees in a top down photograph. Or I could just be blind and dumb.

>>25

That's why she took that picture. Too keep us busy looking. I doubt anyone will be able to find it unless you have some software shit the FBI uses.

To OP, nice find.

>>26
She didn't take the photo in OP, she did.

>>27

Your saying that L's lady-friend took the picture looking out of a window on the third floor of L's house?

>>26

Contact the FBI and ask them for assistance.

>>27

She took the pictures of L down by the river.

>>28

I don\'t think so. I think he maybe talking about the river photos.

wow... that's a nice little woodland spot

I love groves and clearings... nice and semi-quiet

not a dead silence like an abandoned bunker though, a good quietness.

>>27

'Sue'

Someone give me the phone number of the house in >>20's picture and I'll call it tomorrow.

>>32
I think if she is still there, then she defintally had to be evacuated for flooding. Not sure of the situation now, results for local on that street are hard to find right now because of all the traffic sites that come up instead.

>>33
There was though a pool supply center and a daycare. There there was this but I don't know what it is.

>>34

Looks like that is pointing to the wrong house although Google markers always seem to be off by a bit. Someone pack up your things and take a trip for Oxford for the day. I would but it just happens to be that I am on the other side of the Atlantic.

>>32

>Someone give me the phone number of the house in >>20's picture and I'll call it tomorrow.

"Why hello there! I have been looking at satellite photos of your home on the internet! I am wondering if this is or was formerly Cracky-chan's residence? I am stalking her but it's nothing creepy you see, I'm just a fan of her artistic photography!"
Honestly what would you say if you called that house? I see no reason to think it's hers other than the general location...

>>36

cough*Telemarketer*cough

>>37
now you're thinking with portals!

Looks like good ol' Suede is up for a field trip. I'm really against anything stalking but I can't blame the guy. Suede, may you have your own peace of mind, whichever way you want to attain it.

dear god jesus nothing savior help us all

This isn't even stalking. For one we have no idea where she actually lives. It's been well over a year and she could have moved. If she hasn't moved by now she would move after all of the flooding in Oxford (How the hell do we even know she lives here? Was it the IP address that was posted on 420chan that was registered with an ISP in Oxford? Even with the pictures of her in Oxford it doesn't mean she lives there). And for Christ's sake, we don't even know her first name.

Good luck Suede! My hat goes off to you.

Well Suede, good luck on that trip to Oxford.

I think trying to find her is idiotic. What are you going to ask when you do find her, 'Hi, are you Cracky?'. And what are you going to do when you do find her, to anyone who is looking? I think this is a case of not planning ahead. The poor girl's probably scared to death of you guys so it's not like she's going to admit she's Cracky.

In the case of just 'accidentally' bumping into her if you go to where you suspect she lives, will that not seem odd? Could you honestly strike up a true conversation with a woman who looks like and you suspect to be Cracky, without feeling disillusioned and guilty about your motivations? Oh geez, so many questions to ponder.

I would like to find her also, at least to find out how she is, but that's about as far as it goes. Now thinking ahead and physically trying to find her, it wouldn't be wise.

On that topic, you'd think as many people that may come across her daily, in school or otherwise, would come out and say just for a chance to win the internets for us and some 4chan members, and to chat it up. I'm sure anyone that knows her may know about her popularity with 4chan because of how word spreads and new pictures of her leaked. Anyhow, she seems to be doing a good job of being anonymous the past year and if the solace makes her happy, I'm all for it.

>>33
Good point. /r/ link to that page.
>>36
I'll just ask for her brother.
>>37>>38
"Hello, this is Aperture Science, and we were wondering if you'd be interesting in participating in our latest test."
>>39
ROAD TRIP FUCK YEAH.
>>42
Your opinion is noted.
I think she said that one person she knew in real life knew her as Cracky-chan.

>>40

Fussing and planning over an area where she was supposedly spotted is not stalking?

For god's sake don't wish the guy luck. There is nothing for him to gain in doing what I think he's going to do.

I'm telling you this Suede because I care for your well-being: do not go. Get yourself a fat loving girl and be all you can be.

>>45
I'm going to phone first.

>>46

well jesus don't get carried away with whatever response you'll get

>>47
How do you mean?

>>47
It's ok it's not her house, also it'll be several feet deep in water.

So you're going to pretend to be her brother's friend, Suede? lol. Aren't you maybe a little too old? In all the pictures I've seen of him he's a little kid. Brother's name is Alex i think but you probably know more than I do.
From the sound of things maybe you ought to bring some scuba gear =D. You can claim you were concerned that Cracky may have gotten stuck in the water. Suede to the rescue. =O

>>44
I think you need to look up the term 'stalking'.

>>50
I think her brother is 15.

Make sure to bring a Glock along with you just in case someone tries to attack you.

Take some pictures for us.

>>52
I agree.

This is all way to public, take it to Suedes board. Some of us would rather not be associated with this stalking faggotry.

If anything happens to her I'll personaly blow your fucking head off Robert.

>>54

does he now? link to this board so this topic can die?

>>55

I'm not linking directly, find it yourself..

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=wish+cracky&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

>>51
15, really?

Well damn, it'd be more reasonable if I was asking for him.
Unfortunately, I am an Amerifag and do not have a dialect such as those who were born and raised in the UK.

>>57
He does look pretty young in the pictures of him.

There really isn't any point trying to stalk her. She'll have moved house years ago.

Not trying to rain on anybody's parade, just trying to let Anonymous down easily before he turns up at what he thinks is her house then gets greeted by some bald nigger with a shotgun.

Haha, oh wow. This is more than slightly wrong, but I won't deny that I find it fascinating and hope we see pics from any field expeditions.

/r/ to be brough along on the road trip for epic lulz. I will bring psychadelics and shit and we can make Fear and Loathing in Oxford: A Savage Journey to the Heart of Cracky-chan.

>>61

/r/ video when said film is made for lulz and OMG's.

>>62

And also /r/ that Anonymous waits one or two years until I get a car. Fuck being 16.

>I will bring psychadelics and shit and we can make Fear and Loathing in Oxford: A Savage Journey to the Heart of Cracky-chan.

Did someone say psychedelic?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hik6fuMPcOI
I need to track down a copy of the whole thing.

>>61
This is sounding more interesting by the minute.

>>63
Scooter, lol.
Look on the bright side, at least you're young enough that your interest in scm seems somewhat natural and non-pedo.

>>65
She's only 4 months younger than me. Plus she's legal. So that's not paedo, right?

>>66

So your 17?

Her DOB is 10-12-90.

>>67
Hmmm.

Well she said she was 'barely 15' when she first posted on /b/ which was in January of 2005. So she is either 17 going on 18 or 18 going on 19.

And the 10-12 that she posted in scarecrow maiden could have meant December 12 not October 12.

>>68

December 10*

>>67
I'm 18. 10/02/1989. I always thought hers was 12/10/1989.

Anyway, I forgot to try the number yesterday, so I'll make sure to do it today.

>>70

Actually, I am fairly confident that it's 12-10-90.

December 12, 1990 it is then. It makes sense since she said she was 'barely 15' when she posted in January 2005.

>>73
ps. cracky herself confirmed this was her real birthday(year still unknown) and it upsetted her to know people found out.

October 12, 1990 it is then! You know, it wouldn't be that hard to find her going through records of birth dates or just plain old searching though a database of UK IDs with that birthdate and several other bits of information.

>>75
Oh lawd. I doubt anyone would have access to this information. Unless someone wants to break the law to gain access to this information then go right ahead, be my guest. Also I think October 12, 1990 would be the correct date if it's true what >>73 said.

>>75
>>76

1. Wait until we have ID cards forced upon us against the will of the people
2. Get a job at one of the numerous private firms that will be contracted to manage the information
3. ???
4. PROFIT

So I phoned that number today. It rang for a little while, then went straight to the answer machine. There wasn't even a "leave a message after the tone" message or anything, it just stopped ringing and beeped. So I just hung up. I'll try again tomorrow I guess.

>>78
Well, I don't even think thats the right number to the house. Well if you do get an answer and it's not the right number ask about the 'teenage girl' in the neighborhood or some shit like that.

>>79

Because every neighbourhood has just one teenage girl in it that everybody knows, amirite or amirite.

Could you sound more suspicious?

>>80
No because it's 'THAT TEENAGE GIRL WHO RAISES HELL EVERY SINGLE NIGHT PARTYING AND WAKES EVERYONE UP LATE AT NIGHT'.

i Think so she is 18