Me so ronry ;_;
e so ronry ;_;
so ronry ;_;
so ronry ;_;
o ronry ;_;
ronry ;_;
ronry ;_;
onry ;_;
nry ;_;
ry ;_;
y ;_;
;_;

>>2

;_;

>>3
;_; SHILCKSHILICKSHILICK

>>4

There's no one
Just me onry
Sitting on my rittle throne
I work very hard and make up great prans
But nobody ristens, no one understands
Seems that no one takes me serirousry

And so I'm ronery
A little ronery
Poor rittre me!

angel wings were really ratty, and thrown out.

>>6
;_; I would have bought them

>>6
I am sad. I have a party to go to on Saturday, and my first instinct for costume has been crushed :(

Will probably end up as Garry Oldman style dracula.

>>6
>>8

Just where is the logic here?

>>9
wooo party -> damn, fancy dress -> creativity fail -> wings like a cracky chan -> must get cracky wings -> will buy, will buy -> originals are gone ;_; -> vampires? -> garry oldman was best -> I have no top hat -> obligatory thought about sex -> I should buy a top hat -> <3 cracky -> sob, wings.

I think that was pretty much the train of thought.

>>6

Also ;_;

How about the cat ears? They belong into some kind of internet museum. Or onto ebay...

>>10

k

>>9
My ex is making me fox ears for Christmas. Am not wearing ears until these are completed (IMO I would look awful in those cat ears, but could probably pull of the wings)

>>13

Are you female? Otherwise: Neko + male = gay

>>14
Ex-GF is a huge neko, neko is relevant to my interests (she went neko AFTER we broke up, dammit).

Fox ears are for teh lulz more than anything, she's making a pair of ears each for a bunch of friends.

Not a neko, but can't deny that I'd enjoy the fox ears.

>>14
Forgot to add to >>15 (though it was implied?), no I'm male.

gtfo furfag

>>17
wow thar. For a start, nekomimi =/= furfag (note the complete lack of fur for a start), also am not even a neko.

in before "lol, trolled"

also, fox = Kemonomimi? not neko

>>18
kawaii desu yo sugoi ne?? ^^

gtfo

>>20
Not by choice, too many friends have turned into wapanese fags over the years... hence, I know way to much.

Me? I just like the shape of the ears, it's cute... relation to Japan is coincidental at most. (Personally, actual Japanese culture is pretty fucking awful, export culture usually doubly so)

>>21
*too
before anyone starts

Furfags gtfo mah .71

MAI WAIFU! MAIN!

>>24

-.-

You've got me there.
You acted wisely!
What are you up to?

form MasterD to "wannabe MasterD"

>>25
thats the stuff

>>1
Close enough?
http://195.242.99.71/cracky_orig/kareha.pl/1190466689/2

>>27
If I didn't know better, I'd say thats her brother.I know his face but just can't place him. friend? i hope not.
Much as I know, I wish I knew more.
I do not want to see this.
I don't want to hurt somebody.

>>28

It is not. Just stop this faggotry. The Cracky in your head waits for you and only you and will never betray you. But the real Lia has every right to live as a normal person.

And why are you suddenly able to use the subjunctive correctly just to fall back into your usual gibberish two sentences later? It is not funny, it is annoying. If you want to be a trip fag that can be taken seriously, please create another persona. This is the intenet and you are free to do so.

>>27

She really looks like the kind of girl who needs a guy more than she will ever love him. Sad...

>>30
i don't know about that, you may be reading into this too much. remember beeing a teen? or were you afraid of trying things?

>>31

As an anon, I myself can freely admit I was afraid to try things. That, and other girls were probably to afraid to try things with myself also. A reserved dork, was I.

Whatever the case, if one feels a need for human contact yet too afraid of committing too much into that one person, it doesn't make them a slutty girl or a douchebag guy. Everyone has some kind of insecurity issues or afraid of being hurt in some way.

>>27

Ignorant.

>>31
I for one was afraid to try things.

And look where I am today. King of the neckbeards. Fantastic.

>>33
You're a Duke, tops.

>>30
>>32
How on earth do you get to such conclusions from a single image? It is merely a glimpse of a moment.

>>35
Wild extrapolations from fragments of information are what this whole thing's built on.

>>31
So when are we gonna get some movement on this CrackyxFaux rugmunching thing? Once you make contact and set up a date, my Mastercard is good for all the rubber/leather toys and such.

>>37
umm Julia doesn't swing that way.

I'm sure many will disagree, but I rather like
http://195.242.99.71/cracky_orig/src/1190466711745.jpg

His stony stare into the distance and she with her eyes closed and full of passion and mercy.

And he sort of has a classical greek statue face. compare
http://195.242.99.71/crackypedia/original/1137030408792.jpg

Maybe it's to show that for Cracky to love you, you'd have to be beyond what we would consider a typical human (Lia's obviously quite another story). You'd have to be unchanging, unmoveable and eternal. Yet she's kissing a boy, not a statue here, to show that at certain times
when you close your eyes, you can imagine someone to be an avatar of the infinite, but I guess most here already figured that out.

I realize it's only a snapshot, but then again, it's an artists job to make everything around that moment turn into irrelevant context and single out what it means.

>>39
You just singled out the two worst cracky pics ever.

Stop making up bullshit reasons it's art and just tell us you like the pics because you're hot for a 15 year old.

>>38
Jewels is not short for Julia, try again ;p

>>40
but her eyelashes are soo long! that in itself is art

>>40
Ah, right, I forgot the personal tastes of tripfags are the golden standard regarding taste on here. Oh wait ...

ps:
If you can't find any hotter 15 year olds on the internets, maybe you should just leave computers alone entirely and go find another hobby.

>>41
Jules?

>>40
You hate the statue pic? It has kind of a playful sweetness to it. Like she was just dicking around having fun.

>>44

>she was just dicking around having fun.

I won't debate that premise. In fact, that's sort of exactly why I had a problem with >>39 to start with?

>>41
are you sure you wan't to let us try again, since you don't use it anywhere, M.? :P (sry i cheated)
>>39
haha i love these explanations, it's like complete bullshit in a certain way, and you know it, but it still makes sence (also in a certain way) and it's fun to read. (for me anyway)
>>31
there was nobody i could try things with..

>>43 see thats the loser spelling.
>>46 i know what you tried and its also wrong. i don't pay for my domain, it was a sustained gift. doing that will get you nowhere.

>>47
was your comcast email also a sustained gift? Or is it shared? :P nom nom nom

This is the point where this board should implode.

>>48
i dont use a comcast mail o__O

>>49
woa! i think it happened, but it missed
-
why did i feel like i did something wrong, when i first read this 15 min ago? I think its better now.. anyway maybe ill say something again in a couple of hours, most likely drunk.

lols trolling sucessful

>>50
sure
[insert stuff here that is deleted but is still there]
stop driving me in a corner

>>53
Hey, that did not take that long?

>>45

>>she was just dicking around having fun.

>I won't debate that premise. In fact, that's sort of exactly why I had a problem with >>39 to start with?

Your argument was

• These pics are awful
• People do not write seriously about pics that are awful
• You write seriously about these pics even though they are awful
• Your writing is based in falsehood.

and now you claim

• pics that are fun cannot be written about seriously
• this pic was fun (and thus cannot be written about seriously)
• Your writing is based in falsehood.

They're to different arguments and even though they arrive at the same conclusion, they're not "sort of exactly" the same.

Anyway, I think it's more likely that you just can't stand positive attention for an image you hate because it destroys what you secretly crave for yourself. See ? Unsound premises lead to baseless conjecture. Would woulda thunk that ?!

>>55
omg.. THIS IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A MATHEMATICAL CONJECTURE. tl;dr

Let me paraphrase what >>45 was referring to, if I got it right: She is not an artist but snapped pictures for fun. There is no deeper meaning to be sought.

>>56
Yeah, it's pretty amazing how she managed to do it subconsciously anyway.

>>48
DO WANT.

>>57
To do what? Create a deeper meaning or aesthetic images?

>>55
lol Whata is not me

I actualy like the statue pic quite a lot.

holy fucking shit I always seem to cause a shitstorm

Well, I'll consider this my contribution to the circlejerk. Enjoy your resuscitated traffic, Bounceme.

>>56

What I was thinking.

Everything we ever felt is akin to someone being enamored by a bunch of paintings - really beautiful ones - but later found out that it was done by an elephant slapping away at the canvas.

>>62
That's a little harsh. She has some genuine natural skill in composition etc. Still though, it's true that the Cracky fanclub is mostly about people wanting what they imagine her to be.

>>62
It is not an elephant. It is a young teenager trying out things. And that is why it went as quickly as it came...

>>55
Once again anonymous has misconstrued a simple concept. This is what happens on web communities where users aren't required to prove their baseline competency by completing a simple registration dialogue.

I said:

• The two pictures are awful.
• The two pictures are not art (without justifying that claim whatsoever)
• You're retarded for writing at length about something that isn't art.

I later provided a very brief justification for why I don't view most of the Cracky pictures as art. Art is serious business and only trained professional artists are able to create art. It's sort of like how licensed doctors are the only ones who can practice medicine.

I am now claming:

• Anonymous is not worth talking to.
• Anonymous is not worth listening to.
• Anonymous cannot understand simple sentences and ideas.
• Anonymous believes ideas must be fully developed, for his benefit, in a singular and long-winded post.

Hope this clears things up,
-bigmike

tl;dr

perfect summary of whatafaggot's post = the pic

>>66
I lol'd

>>65
WHAT? There is no point in this posting - it contradicts itself. tl;dr

>>65

Your oppinion of Anonymous is unfortunate given that just before I started lurking I told you on 4chan /b/ that you had created some hope about the people lurking there. I was Anonymous then.

>>65

>I don't view most of the Cracky pictures as art.

great, you have an opinion, on the internet no less.

>Art is serious business and only trained professional artists are able to create art.
>It's sort of like how licensed doctors are the only ones who can practice medicine.

false simile

>I am now claming:

<snip whine>

> * Anonymous cannot understand simple >sentences and ideas.

ehm, "NO U" ?

> * Anonymous believes ideas must be fully developed, for his benefit, in a singular and long-winded post.

Unfortunately thinking your own life is so interesting or your posts so good they need to be tied to and indentified as belonging to your e-persona does not exempt you from actually making sense.

>Hope this clears things up,

It does, somewhat. Are you even old enough to be here ?

After spending a few minutes here I can easily say that all of are lacking of any wit or intelligence whatsoever. You all believe yourselves to be better than everyone else, and I can tell you right now, that that is not the case in the slightest, you pseudo-intellectuals. I am much better than all of you. Clearly I am because I am neither pretentious, long-winded, asinine, discourteous, nor are my tastes quite as bland as yours. No, I am quite concise, and I would never stretch beyond that of my means or what I am designated to.

I'd have to say that this board is full of anonymous lurkers, attackers, and trolls, who have nothing better to do than throw their elitist opinions around in an attempt at misguided show-boating with people they'd never ever meet.

None of you build any persona or stand by anything remotely attached that I can feel some sort of personal connection to. You lack any sort of direction and I can't have that. You're analogies are far too complicated, linear, and they're rather contradictory. Why, there's never even any variety here!

I give this image board, masquerading as a message board, a 1/10.

>>70
"Old enough"? Lol..

>>71

You were supposed to have GTFO yesterday. Didn't think you'd last. Cracky's are like potato chips, you can't take just one bite.

>>65

>claming

>>73
I do not believe that slogan was created in reference to all potato chips but rather one brand. So, unless you can inform me whether cracky is more like Lays or Pringles, I'm gonna have to disagree with you here. Perhaps you could say that Cracky is like...uh...Crack? Once you start, you steal shit and act in an anti-social behavior. Then the police are called in, the state mandates rehabilitory treatment and you end up jittery and useless as a human.

(I'd pick Pringles: But that's just because I like slamming stacks...)

>>70

• Points aren't in bullet form.
• Points not in bullet form are to be disregarded.

-"The false simile expresses the impediment of human language and perception, the impediment of unlikeness."

>>74
-Canadian dialect.
-You'd understand that if you weren't uncultured swans.

Saging a post that wouldn't bump the thread anyways.