>>45

>>she was just dicking around having fun.

>I won't debate that premise. In fact, that's sort of exactly why I had a problem with >>39 to start with?

Your argument was

• These pics are awful
• People do not write seriously about pics that are awful
• You write seriously about these pics even though they are awful
• Your writing is based in falsehood.

and now you claim

• pics that are fun cannot be written about seriously
• this pic was fun (and thus cannot be written about seriously)
• Your writing is based in falsehood.

They're to different arguments and even though they arrive at the same conclusion, they're not "sort of exactly" the same.

Anyway, I think it's more likely that you just can't stand positive attention for an image you hate because it destroys what you secretly crave for yourself. See ? Unsound premises lead to baseless conjecture. Would woulda thunk that ?!