>>45
>>she was just dicking around having fun.
>I won't debate that premise. In fact, that's sort of exactly why I had a problem with >>39 to start with?
Your argument was
- These pics are awful
- People do not write seriously about pics that are awful
- You write seriously about these pics even though they are awful
- Your writing is based in falsehood.
and now you claim
- pics that are fun cannot be written about seriously
- this pic was fun (and thus cannot be written about seriously)
- Your writing is based in falsehood.
They're to different arguments and even though they arrive at the same conclusion, they're not "sort of exactly" the same.
Anyway, I think it's more likely that you just can't stand positive attention for an image you hate because it destroys what you secretly crave for yourself. See ? Unsound premises lead to baseless conjecture. Would woulda thunk that ?!