>>55
Once again anonymous has misconstrued a simple concept. This is what happens on web communities where users aren't required to prove their baseline competency by completing a simple registration dialogue.

I said:

• The two pictures are awful.
• The two pictures are not art (without justifying that claim whatsoever)
• You're retarded for writing at length about something that isn't art.

I later provided a very brief justification for why I don't view most of the Cracky pictures as art. Art is serious business and only trained professional artists are able to create art. It's sort of like how licensed doctors are the only ones who can practice medicine.

I am now claming:

• Anonymous is not worth talking to.
• Anonymous is not worth listening to.
• Anonymous cannot understand simple sentences and ideas.
• Anonymous believes ideas must be fully developed, for his benefit, in a singular and long-winded post.

Hope this clears things up,
-bigmike