>>112
Glad to be perpetuating the lulz and phail.

I would be making beautiful cracky chan art if I was actually good at it. As it is, so far I have failed to make things look (much) like cracky and I don't consider any of it worthy for my offering (I didn't even save a load of the stuff I tried).

Ironically I hate most of these pictures for the abomination they show (although >>2 is nice if I distance it from the whole cracky thing).

Picture choice was based on your pose. I too would have preferred to use some of your other pics if I could (though I like the one I used too)... again, skills are lacking.