>>15
>>17

Dear sirs or madams, you clearly stopped reading after the word 'camwhore'. This may have reduced your enjoyment of my post, though it was stupid to begin with. In the future, please make sure your reading comprehension is set as high as it can go (I find a value of FTW works best).

But seriously, I make a post where I don't actually set out to troll, just to make some dumb programming jokes and I get jumped on for saying 'Cracky' and 'camwhore' in the same sentence? Your standards boggle me. For the uninitiated: I claimed that cracky had the attributes of a camwhore. Finding fault with this, I claimed that camwhores have the attributes of Cracky. I found fault with this too, finally declaring "no! This is retarded."

This was clearly farce, but it wasn't even farce at Cracky's expense (for once), it was at the expense of...I dunno, Python or other camwhores or something.

I take umbrage at your remarks, creepy chronologists of that colourful, cut camwhore called Cracky, quite failing to fathom farce.

/sleep