>>38
PLEASE try to shake off your delusions of grandeur/persecution mania. They're really quite pathetic. I can't imagine that there is anybody who feels strongly enough about this board, or about the little Cracky community in general, to want to co-ordinate - or pseudo-cocrdinate by "trolling" and "sock-puppeting", as you seem to be suggesting - an attack on it.

It's not a matter that I consider worth giving very much thought to, but my guess would be that, in all probability, the "voices" you refer to really are the "voices" of three different people.

There's little doubt at this point, as I say, that "Camel-and-Black-Cock" guy himself is one of those dime-a-half-dozen, pseudo-Zen virtuosi of the /b/board whom I've seen turn up from time to time here and on CH ("Fap-To-This" guy; "Pedrobear"; a couple of others who've become enamoured of a certain "super-cool", "idiot savant" stance and have copied it). He can't really be said to be RAISING THE TOPIC of Camel and black mem, because one thing you can be 100% sure about with these pseudo-Zen types is that wild horses couldn't drag them into any DISCUSSION of their single, ironically-repeated post. This type considers himself FAR, FAR, FAR too clever and cool to actually DIALOGUE with anybody. Silent awe and admiration is the only response he's looking for, and demands.

Insofar as this is the case, then, anyone calling "Camel-and-Black-Cock" "interesting" - let alone calling him "the most interesting thing on the board" - is guilty of a basic and serious confusion. The topic that "Camel-and-Black-Cock" guy has been raisng MIGHT WELL be interesting - IF he were actually raising a topic, which he isn't (as I say, he's just a boundlessly self-regarding narcissist for whom other human beings (and their opinions) have no existence at all). Still, I don't doubt that the person who has posted that "Camel-and-Black-Cock" guy is "the only one who makes sense" here is sincere, and really a different person from "Camel-and-Black-Cock" guy. He seems to be confused, and not very bright or articulate, but I suppose the idea he is grasping and driving at is that the TOPIC OF DISCUSSION - beautiful young ex-Crackyfags and their possible motivations for taking black lovers - is a much more interesting one than most of the boring nonsense that people want to discuss on here.

And needless to say, I'll also insist - but I would, wouldn't I? - that the "third voice" that's been going on about Anaximander, Heraclitus and so on is indeed a third and different voice - the voice of someone who (in direct and absolute contrast to "Camel-and-Black-Cock" guy himself - would be only too happy to talk, or just to joke, about the topic that "Camel-and-Black-Cock" guy has pretended to raise.