>>106
You are jumping to conclusions, I am what I guess you would call the "first editor", the unsolicited one I would say...
I'm not sure I agree with some of the choices >>104 made, in particular darkening the hair and making the face paler, much paler than the rest of the skin I.E. the arm, I like the higher contrast but it brings the whole pic back to the jarring state that the original shop had.
It is beyond fixing anyway, the problem is in the slight mismatch in the head angle between the originals of both sources. It could be tweaked with transform functions I suppose, but it will never look truly natural either way. Best you can hope for is some camouflage.
Sorry, I am not butthurt but I still prefer mine to the second edit. It's not to say I wouldnt prefer a subsequent edit, or that my artistic choices are "better" than anybody else either...
I think what I'm saying is that >>106 is just how resident troll trying to stir some shit, as usual...