>>12
No. You didn't understand my message.
I don't consider it just "the work of someone". Yeah that is how artistic works are usually developed. But this is not such sort of situation. This time there was a third ingredient, a very rare ingredient valuable beyond price: the Queen of the Sky, which cannot be tainted even by humanity at its lowest because she is before manifestation.
The Queen of the Sky is something that has been known by many names in different times. For the egyptians she was called Isis, and it was said that no man had ever lifted her veil. Isis's veil are her physical manifestations. Cracky-chan's pictures are a physical manifestation in our time of Something that has been happening all throughout history. Isis is said to have an infinite multiplicity of manifestations. Today it could be Cracky, tomorrow we don't know. We can see her through her vessels, but we cannot lift the veil through which we see her, that is her vessels.
What I'm trying to say here is that even if the veil had worn out and become just a rag, that wouldn't make devotion for Her less valid. Problems and drama come when you worship the veil instead of Isis.