>>5
Let's see. There at least two, and probably three who think she looks like a boy.
So you post an image to show that she's undeniably a girl, which was already established (no need to point out "that boy looks like a boy"), and deriving somehow that either those who think she looks like a boy, or you, must be homosexual.

So either she is you, and you're feeling somewhat short changed because random internet strangers feel you do not look like a typical girl, in which case I would like to say.
I think I see your point; maybe posting some more nudes will make it more clear for all to see.

Or in case you're not her.
Well, I think an analyst/philosopher like you can figure out the obvious.