[Burichan] [Futaba] [Futaba Ols] [Gurochan] [Photon] - [Home]

[Return]
Reply mode
Link
Subject
Comment
File
Verification
Password (for post and file deletion)
Leave empty (spam trap):
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.

File: 1280609859106.jpg -(24303 B, 400x383) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
24303 No.1   [Reply]

Why do Cracky haters insist on hanging around here?

>> No.2  
File: 1280611154756.jpg -(77803 B, 760x522) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
77803

either masochism or wannabe sadism

doesnt matter, all will be unrequited in the end
it's the law of the land

>> No.3  

don't think there are haters, just some trolls who think by pissing people off, their "competition" for crackylove will get less in numbers, i mean seriously, who could hate her

>> No.4  

...cant...resist...

I think I've finally figured out who could haet Cracky. It took some work, but I recently had a conversation with my sister (a /b/tard herself) who confirmed what 2 failed camwhores told me about their feelings on the matter.

Cracky haeters are:

A. Catty camwhores or camwhore aspirants who think that they are physically cuter than Cracky but know that they will never get nearly as much attention as they "deserve" by comparison.

B. Fags

C. Guys with no taste for nuance who would be better off just buying a Hustler.

The "A" group are by far the most vocal.

"I can't understand why that ugly cunt gets more stalkers, but I end up being the only one responding to my own thread when I'm SOOOOOOO CUTE!" they say.

I can understand this. It must be crushing to realise that no one cares as much about you on /b/ as they do, say, at a bar.

Do you know what the problem is, group "A"? You get boringly nekkid and then stare into the camera with bovine, needy eyes. We could get that (as I suggested to the nuance-challanged men) from Hustler or a medical textbook.

I've seen lots of tits. I've kneeded lots of tits. Tits are great... but only when they are attached to someone interesting.

Cracky understood that. Cracky was unique. Even if it was just an act, she managed to give the impression that we needed her much more than she needed any of us.

>> No.5  
File: 1280853127559.jpg -(186395 B, 412x700) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
186395

>>4
Good theories.... apart from the lack of any examples from A, B or C which kind of relegates the ideas to "interesting speculation".

Cracky inspired Creepy, Loli, You-Know-Who, Dot, Rabbit, Rav, Ophelia as well as quite a few one-offs. There were more camwhores riled by B͛ͮͫ͂͆ͅo̘͉̓x̹̆̔x͉̄͗̄̌̒̓y̞̤͔. There are no examples here or anywhere else of camwhore hate towards Crackster.

Beyond the usual chan faggotry, there have been no identifiably gay male detractors.

The jock stereotype even if it existed would have no more to do with chans other than to rip porn, being too busy fucking real girls and high fiving each other after scoring a goal or whatever make-believe elements of the teen angst movie we choose to confirm our own prejudice towards alpha male behaviour.

>Cracky was uniquely stupid.

fixed. Meant in a nice way.

>she managed to give the impression that we needed her much more than she needed any of us.

Uhh no. I can see where you're coming from with this, but the reality is she played with matches and droped the box when it - unsurprisingly - burst into flames.

She had irl friends, she had irl boyfriends. She came from a rich, supportative family. She liked her brother. She was not "all alone" despite her artistic statements to the contrary.

She wanted instant attention more than she wanted to work on her personality to earn it. She was very good at getting this, as evidenced by new crackyfags appearing five years later. And yet when she got her precious attention... she ran away.

That's not as empowered as your admittedly beautiful prose in that last line suggests.

>>3

>just some trolls

Is the more obvious answer to >>1

Cracky is an unusual drug in that it is either very addictive or... it does nothing at all.

>> No.6  
File: 1280863252489.jpg -(5920 B, 246x188) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
5920

answering to old copypasta makes you look...

well, you know...

>> No.7  
>She had irl friends, she had irl boyfriends. She came from a rich, supportative family. She liked her brother. She was not "all alone" despite her artistic statements to the contrary.

Are you saying she brought everything about her situation upon herself because of Cracky?

>> No.8  

>>6
If it was good enough to eat the first time round, it's good enough to eat five long years later. That appears to be the point of the board now, yes? Endless recursion of time wasted.

>>7
She never dreamed up Cracky, Anon did, when she ran away. We made Cracky-chan into the Goddess, not Olivia.

She fucked herself up needlessly, internet incident aside. Why did she do it? She had everything and anything she wanted, within the general bounds of what could be realisitically achievable for a young teenager, but she desired to be miserable?

It was lazy, that's all. Like fat people who go on and on about how they wanted to be fat all along, it overlooks that being fat is the default state of doing nothing.

Similarly, sitting around moping induces depression by default. That's no achievement, and it's hardly uncommon enough for anyone to seriously believe that it would draw easy attention of the "oh poor me" type.

Luckily for us, Cracky took a break from pretend eating disorders long enough to play with a camera.

>> No.9  
File: 1280872448977.png -(5574 B, 267x259) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
5574

>>8
That was the point of the ...cant...resist...

nice back pedaling, but no, if you argue with copypasta, you act like one of the "new crackyfags" you were talking about, no amount of spinning will change that

are you related to Reynolds, perhaps?

OIC next will come LOL I TROLL U

>> No.10  

>>9

>Endless recursion of time wasted.
>> No.11  
File: 1280875035084.png -(7877 B, 267x259) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
7877

>>10
lol, whatever

just dont spam this board with anime just to save face, calling it magic trolling

there, you can have the last word now

>> No.12  
File: 1314349006535.jpg -(60801 B, 720x489) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
60801
>> No.13  

>>5
you can be lonely,
without being lonesome

>> No.14  

we all need higher feelings. it's an atavistic human requirement. brave new world put it very well - the flow of the cultural norm can suppress higher feelings, but in the end they're a necessity for life. people may not know that they need crackylilyalicelain's ether, but they do.

but it's difficult to introduce the crackle energy to those ignorant of their need. as an example of someone who tried to spread awareness of the higher emotions, i'll take nietzsche. through his prophetic peripheral of zarathustra, he tried to spread an enlightened life, utilitarian - including the utility of beauty, awe, wonder. but nietzsche drowned in his creations. it's so hard to spread the higher senses without losing oneself. compare the orgion scene in the secret history. the higher emotions cannot be shepherded towards ignorant people; they are a torrent that will sweep you away if even for their good you try to control them.

crackyalicelainlily cannot be pointed towards people. attempt to and you will lose yourself even more than you have already. unbelievers must come calmly, stoically, and without prejudice to the higher world.

>> No.15  

>>14

If you espouse utilitarianism like you claim, you'd probably realize those higher feelings aren't really needed to survive. Then again, you mostly lost me. You should try not to attribute your emotions to people, then you'd convey more to others. Also, don't forget your meds.

>> No.16  

>>15
true utility must recognise the function of the higher feelings - release, liberty, dare i say catharsis. the higher feelings do indeed have a function. you can live without them, in a basic brain/heart-alive form, but i can't see anyone being truly mens sana without some form of emotional release. awe, fear, wonder, love: all these are required to free the feelings. we need wondrous things to be healthy. a strict utilitarian would have us on bread and water, but utility must take into account health. catharsis is healthy.

>> No.17  

>>16

I get you. But you speak a bit out there like I do in my manic episodes.

>> No.18  

>>17
ah, i'm glad you understood. sorry for the rambling. i do have a manic/depressive illness (sza), and it manifests so subtly sometimes that i can't tell i'm symptomatic until i start rambling. i have had my meds, but i had a bad psychotic breakthrough last weekend and the meds haven't been doing much since then. would you like to join me on tc?

>> No.19  

>>18

Tinychat? Maybe but I won't be around long.

>> No.20  

>>18
that's hardly rambling in my book. it happens that thought is irresistible enough that it exceeds its communication mediums, its intensity alone being transmitted. it then has to either take the form of an hymn, a triumphal sound or concatenate itself in dense, compact formulations so correct that they are obscure and brilliant at the same time.
write essays or something, you'll have linguists fawning over your Nietzschean style

>> No.21  

>>20
thank you so much! eeee

>> No.22  

.



Delete Post []
Password