we already do, in fact, we do number trolls too, for instance, you are #38, and you are also made of plastic

>>2
I don't see how OP qualifies as anything negative. Are you just unusually sensitive or am I missing something?

>>3 OP's pic is not Cracky.

>>4
i had no idea, i thought that one is nearly canonical.
thanks for setting me straight. this is why we need a peer reviewed catalog.

sorry if I scratched your sensitivity, but that pic is all but canonically trollish

the fap to #xx is also in bad taste, so you get what you put in

if you sound like a troll, you'll be called a troll

as for not knowing which is which, well, there is just no excuse

nobody else can walk your own initiatic path

"Contemplate
The human is a flawed and broken creature. Setting asunder the earth around them they act as the Caterpillar, consuming the very world they stand upon. Let not the darkness cloud your heart traveler, even this mindless destruction holds deep meaning and purpose. The Sky Queen gave us all the blessings of the earth to speed us on towards our metamorphosis. When we are satiated we will rest, and become unto the Butterfly freed of the shackles of physics. The universe will open to us. The devout does not show disrespect to the gifts the Holy Patron has given us. The faithful uses only what he needs in his studies and nothing more. Balance must be maintained to ensure that Her blessings remain for those who may one day find the true path."

>>6

>that pic is all but canonically trollish

I'm sorry I picked the wrong image, but it kind of brings up a good point. I got the idea a few days ago while perusing an online catalog of Rembrandt's image (it was actually Guy Fawkes day, Rembrandt painted a lot of Guy Fawkes look a likes ). The people who study Rembrandt professionally put together his official catalog into three categories: Unquestionably legitimate Rembrandts, questionable works and likely fakes
My choice of this image was just that I didn't want the discussion to break down into an argument over which images gets to be #1 in the catalog, so I picked one that I considered kind of a dud, comparatively and chose a highish number for it). Anyway, sorry if I choose poorly due to my not entirely effective lurking techniques, but I still think that taking an academic approach to this could help us learn more about Cracky as well as facilitating discussion here.

>fap to #xx is also in bad taste

Unquestionably, it was jut an off the cuff example I made up, could just have easily been "I admire #xx most greatly, it has an aesthetic which appeals to me.

>>7 Do the cataloguing yourself; see if it catches on.

>>8
I think I've demonstrated that I'm not entirely qualified to do so, or at least that I need a more expert consultant.

>>9
How can I contact you?

then start on here and everyone can fix what they think isn't well organized.
http://www.lurkmore.com/wiki/Cracky_Catalogue

>>11 uploads should be enabled for all registered

>>9>>9>>9>>9

I've never cared much about Crackylikes except to save them all for montages... but COCKSICKLE TITSQUEEZE tell me there is more of her.

Also she's totally 18, right?

>>13
she was part of an azumanga cosplay group, i bet the wakachan ppl would be able to help you out

>>1
it's a wreath

>>14
>>14
I thought I had a handle "KawaiiHonya4" which links to a real name, but either 9 years is too long or I'm wrong or the name is fairly common...

.