>>6

>that pic is all but canonically trollish

I'm sorry I picked the wrong image, but it kind of brings up a good point. I got the idea a few days ago while perusing an online catalog of Rembrandt's image (it was actually Guy Fawkes day, Rembrandt painted a lot of Guy Fawkes look a likes ). The people who study Rembrandt professionally put together his official catalog into three categories: Unquestionably legitimate Rembrandts, questionable works and likely fakes
My choice of this image was just that I didn't want the discussion to break down into an argument over which images gets to be #1 in the catalog, so I picked one that I considered kind of a dud, comparatively and chose a highish number for it). Anyway, sorry if I choose poorly due to my not entirely effective lurking techniques, but I still think that taking an academic approach to this could help us learn more about Cracky as well as facilitating discussion here.

>fap to #xx is also in bad taste

Unquestionably, it was jut an off the cuff example I made up, could just have easily been "I admire #xx most greatly, it has an aesthetic which appeals to me.