>>14
I for one am glad to see others in the Cracky community actually have an interest for Zizek. Also I'm sorry you do not understand him. Actually it could be a good idea to relate Cracky-chan to the Lacanian Thing he usually references.
"The Lacanian Thing is the empty site which remains when the process of symbolic signification is complete, i.e. which cannot be signified at all, despite repeated attempts, and thus, in the popular imagination persists only as an inert, meaningless, amorphous mass. There is a constitutive void at the heart of the symbolic order designating its inconsistency. Any object that is elevated to this site becomes associated with a traumatic, excessive enjoyment and will be perceived to be radically at odds with the socio-linguistic universe of flexible meanings and controllable emotions in which 'normal' beings can live and breathe. "
Also, it is obvious you do not belong here.