which picture?

BS

/discussion

>>3
Tell me these are not the same hands.

http://www.chanchan.ca/image/cracky/res/15.php

If you mean the one in this thread, I hadn't realized it was hers.

I hadn't saved it just in case and I'm still not saving it because I'm disgusted by vaginae.

I remember when she was posting and someone had posted that pic on here. She said something like "swollen vagina?" and nothing more.

veri: dizz, opposite of jizz

>>6
I seem to remember that too. I guess by insulting the picture she was trying to have people believe it wasn't her.

If that is indeed her vagina, then I like it, beautiful lips

>>8

I agree, olivia does have a nice vagina

i never thought a vagina could be cute until now.

you god damned faggots. that's a hideous vagina.

i've fucked vagina that's much prettier than that nasty thing.

>>11
it doesn't look like a porn star's, but somehow that wouldn't look right on cracky.

Mmmm. I'm thinking Arby's

It's not her, she even said so herself when it was posted on bounceme.

>>14

LOL

The picture have the same properties info as some other cracky pics, I checked it earlier. Hand looks the same. I compared the skirt with the out and about series but although not the same skirt it still looks like a cracky skirt. I hoepd it wasn't her but I strongly believe it is. Vagina is not very pretty.

>>16

Maybe she was rubbing anouther girls vagina?

>>4
honestly not much to go on about
I couldnt tell either way

>>1

>>1

>>19

Sup Lia?

>>21

lol im not lia. I found those images from a freind of mine, who knows olivia in rl.

>>22

They are pictures of Lia, dumbfuck. She even posted them on her own tumblr.

>>23

dumbfuck

>>1

>>24

gb2 spain

>>18
The same nail polish chipping in the same pattern. The same finger width. The same skin tone. The same size and shape of the nails.

I've been pondering why everyone freaks out at say, a picture of her hair that is blurry, and might not even be her for sure, and yet shrug their shoulders at a close-up shot of her cunt that is clearly her if you took a few minutes to examine it closely. I think the reason is because no one wants to admit that it is her, because then she is just a simple cam whore like every other girl on here. It shatters their perceptions of the cute, sweet, innocent Cracky that exists in their mind.

>>26

lol ?!

>>28

I honestly don't give a fuck, she's still more than a cam whore to me because of how her pictures have made me feel. I still believe she is cute and sweet, I never thought she was all that innocent, her pictures are too dark and she's not exactly the type afraid to be dirty.
Her acne, her tits, her period blood, her cuts,
why not her vagina?

It doesn't make a difference to me, the mind of Cracky is quite interesting and I love her.

>>30

I love her to. We have to get used to the fact that she may look completely different now. As she has not been since 07.

I have heard rumours that she has gotten plump.

>>28
no
you're an idiot troll
it is not "clearly" her

you are going to have to do a lot better

>>32
oh hai olivia

very far from clear indeed.

And no, noone 'freaks out' at the blurry shots, and most of them are subject to ongoing discussion and analysis. Yes, people do go "Whoaaah" when another one is posted that is clearly her and artistically relevant, like recently.

Basically, dark nail polish is all it has in common. And the questionable image was posted here after the hand-thread, not even as a serious troll, but for fun; obviously different, but the plaid skirt could fool you for a good few seconds.

The original threads might be buried in here somewhere (or maybe it was from before the great purge).

If it's her, it's her; too bad, but not that important in the grand scheme of things. But the chance it's actually her is very close to zero.

I cried over olivia ealier...

>>34

Why? Because your precious Olivia would never take pictures of her sacred cunt?
Please, that's her hand, her style, same camera info, it's her, get over it.

>>36
Non issue for me, if it was truly something earth-shattering, say for instance finding out she was a boy band groupie, then all bets are off. In the meantime I agree w/ >>13 Nummies.

Meh, i don't care if it's her flappy little vag. She could have at least taken a good photo when exposing it.

Her playing WoW is much worse that being a camwhore.

>>36
Why what exactly ?

And please, this has nothing to do with "precious Olivia", and everything to do with you being wrong and being a tremendous douche about it to boot.

>>39

But I am not wrong, it is her vagina.
The proof is overwhelming.

If you still need more proof, here's the exact skirt.

>>41

>>42
While I do agree that it really does look like her hand, the patterns on the skirts are clearly different. The skirt in the top picture has pink stripes that run both horizontally and vertically, whereas the skirt in the bottom picture has red stripes that only run horizontally. Additionally, the white stripes which run vertically in the top picture are noticeably thicker than the stripes on that skirt which run horizontally, whilst the red stripes which run horizontally in the bottom picture are noticeably thicker than the stripes on that skirt which run vertically. I believe the skirt in the bottom picture is the same as the skirt worn in the pictures taken in the woods with Kimi, which >>16 has also identified is not the skirt in the top picture. Furthermore, the points made about the nailpolishes in >>4 being the same are invalid, as the nailpolish on the left is clearly black while the nailpolish on the right merely appears black initially but is actually dark purple, and cannot possibly be "chipping in the same pattern" because the polish on the right isn't chipping at all. Additionally, the difference in the angle of the hands makes comparing their size and shape difficult. Even if an image is made where the angle/positioning of the hands is comparably similar, no matter how closely the two hands resemble each other it would still not conclusively prove that is in fact Cracky's vagina, as Cracky's hands, while perfect in every way, are not unique to their owner and there are plenty of other girls with cameras, pale skin, and long, slender fingers/nails. Its inherent inconclusiveness is why that image never attracted that much attention in the first place. There is simply not enough in either the picture or EXIF data to go by, making this a fucking troll thread whether you choose to believe it's her or not. Faggots.

>>43
The skirt in the woods is different - that one is green/red while this one is black/pink. The lighting in the shots are quite different, hence the slightly different color casts. The poor quality of the lower picture makes it impossible to pick up the thinner lines in the pattern of the skirt. Also, there are plently of pictures of her hands, this is only one example. Exif data says it was shot with an Olympus u-miniD,Stylus V, as many of her other photos were. Seems like you're desperately grasping at straws.

>>42
where was the original vagina pic posted? could anyone repost? so buried

>>45

I think it was posted on Bounceme. Does olivia still play WOW?

>>44 Did you know that the jacket in the woods pictures she was wearing was actually her brothers?

>>45
Not the original place it was posted, but you can see it at this link >>5 (it's #204).

>>44

>>The poor quality of the lower picture makes it impossible to pick up the thinner lines in the pattern of the skirt.

EXACTLY. The woods skirt isn't even green, what the fuck are you talking about. The EXIF data isn't the same just because you claim that it is.

Someone post screencaps of the EXIF data

>>49 >>50
Why not check it for yourself?

fuckin downers. the original poster admitted to copying the exif for legitimacy.

'swollen vag is swollen'

but if it was hers, I'd tongue it all nite :3

That vagina is disgusting inb4 not a porn star vag but normal girls usually have much better ones than that.

>>53

OH, PLEASE tell me idiots like this aren't over here. The vagoo lips have nothing to do with that you fucking virgin moron.

>>54

Nothing to do with what? Tightness? I believe >>53 was referring to looks.

There's even another image embedded as a thumbnail in that one. Clearly the exif data has been toyed with.

>>55

He's implying girls with long vagoo lips like that must have sex a lot. And I'm saying long vagoo lips don't mean a thing.

lol cracky has a gnarly pussy

no wonder she can't find a boyfriend worth shit

im outta here

>>58

Olivia is a lesbian, she said so in her livejournal

look at exif. fake image is fake. someone has taken the image data from the a sup 4chan image and fucked with it to make it look like it belongs to the vagooo pic. now why would they do that if its real?

>>59

>Implying little girls know thier own sexuality.

>implying he wasnt being silly

Implying that he knows all