>>42
While I do agree that it really does look like her hand, the patterns on the skirts are clearly different. The skirt in the top picture has pink stripes that run both horizontally and vertically, whereas the skirt in the bottom picture has red stripes that only run horizontally. Additionally, the white stripes which run vertically in the top picture are noticeably thicker than the stripes on that skirt which run horizontally, whilst the red stripes which run horizontally in the bottom picture are noticeably thicker than the stripes on that skirt which run vertically. I believe the skirt in the bottom picture is the same as the skirt worn in the pictures taken in the woods with Kimi, which >>16 has also identified is not the skirt in the top picture. Furthermore, the points made about the nailpolishes in >>4 being the same are invalid, as the nailpolish on the left is clearly black while the nailpolish on the right merely appears black initially but is actually dark purple, and cannot possibly be "chipping in the same pattern" because the polish on the right isn't chipping at all. Additionally, the difference in the angle of the hands makes comparing their size and shape difficult. Even if an image is made where the angle/positioning of the hands is comparably similar, no matter how closely the two hands resemble each other it would still not conclusively prove that is in fact Cracky's vagina, as Cracky's hands, while perfect in every way, are not unique to their owner and there are plenty of other girls with cameras, pale skin, and long, slender fingers/nails. Its inherent inconclusiveness is why that image never attracted that much attention in the first place. There is simply not enough in either the picture or EXIF data to go by, making this a fucking troll thread whether you choose to believe it's her or not. Faggots.