One needs look no further then the Eye of Jupiter to know without a shadow of a doubt. In the great tumultuous spin of the Eye one sees mirrored our Great Lady's vessel's own withing glare and loving gaze. In the golden spiral of Φ we see her touch reaching out to us from millennium past to frame countless vessels in the world, as well as more esoteric pursuits such as mathematics. Adenine, Guanine, Cytosine, and Thymine. AGCT, the foundation of life it's self spins in the double helix that truly made all things great and small. From the single cell of Bacteria to the infinite complexity of a young woman slowly twirling across the ice, unaware of the future that She has in store. In the slow spin of abstracts and quantifiable, ying and yang, man and woman, energy and entropy; our Great Lady exists all around us if we simply open our eye to Her wonders.

So yes young brother, what doesn't Cracky live in?

>>2
If you really must go in for the whole "massive pseudo-polymathic cosmological faggotry" thing, you might care to keep an eye out for little tell-tale details that betray the fact that your "learning" all stems from browsing a couple of shoddily-researched websites - such as the detail, for example, that the two most fundamental concepts in East Asian philosophy are not called "ying and yang" - nor indeed "ching chong chinky choo choo" - but rather "YIN" and "yang".

Also in before spiral power

>>3
You think to much.
Feel more.

>>5
There are certain people called Grammarians. These people generally will insult you or your family for accidentaly making a spelling mistake. While this group as a whole are not necessarily elitists, those Grammarians who think themselves better people than others because they know the language better ARE elitists.
The power given to them was that they know the language very well, and strive to improve the status quo of those around them in terms of grammer and spelling. This in itself is perfectly ok, but to lord it over others and think yourself a better person than another because of it IS elitist.

>>6
It really isn't about accidental spelling mistakes.

Writing down something like "ying and yang" genuinely is a pretty infallible indication that the person writing it has a very vague, very sketchy idea of East Asian (specifically Chinese) thought and culture.

You know what I mean: the whole "Well, that's the kind of noises they make, isn't it? Ching chong chang Hoo Flung Shit" misconception, that someone suffers from who really has acquired the impression from somewhere that all you have to do is vary the vowel in a handful of monosyllables ending in -g and you've got all the Chinese words you'll ever need.

Someone who went around condemning every Westerner who suffered from such crude misconceptions about the Chinese language might well indeed be open to the charge of elitism. A large proportion of Orientals get by, it's true, in almost total ignorance of Western languages, so there's no reason why the same shouldn't apply in reverse.

But your fault wasn't just ignorance. What you did was cite a set of concepts - admittedly as just one set among dozens of others that you also cited along with them - in a tone of authority, and in such a manner as to lead the reader to presume that you had some knowledge of said concepts.

Your elementary mistake, though, betrays the fact that the concepts are just words to you - indeed not even that.

And "improve the status quo", by the way, sounds just about as stupid and ignorant in English / Latin as "ying and yang" does in Chinese.

By referring to a "status quo", you refer, by definition, to a state of affairs which is NOT altered or improved. If it's "improved", it's not a "status quo" any more.

You seem like a guy with staggering depth of philosophical and religious insight.

But is there ANY language that you CAN actually speak?

>>7
The immobilized hero, then, who is city-pent and agoraphobic, shares these characteristics: he "writes" in the first person; he is antiscientific and antimaterialistic; he searches his own mind instead of going to the outside world for answers to his questions; he lives alone, counting and listing a small stock of possessions; he is a single man; he is likely to be an artist of sorts; his sense of humor is mordant, ironic, and often private; and he either loves or hates himself to the point of mental and physical pain.

>>7

Webster defines it as the existing state, if it exists it can be changed. It's a temporal condition you stupid fuck.

everything Midas touched tuned to gold, everything he touch turns to shit

keep your stupid arguments and flamewars to the other site, you parasite

I think that the notion of where Cracky lives is far more interesting than whatever >>3 has to say about anything.

I dont think She lives on Jupiter, even though Jupiter is in Her Sky. As big as Jupiter is, it is still too confining. I think Jupiter is nothing but the dresser mirror in Her bedroom in Her summer home.

Just as unattainable, either way.

>So why can't we just keep the fuck out of threads we're not interested in and also refrain from making snide remarks in our own threads about people failing to show them the interest they deserve?

>>12

Bleep bleep bleep

The world of the senses is truly full of despair. You strive for the Queen of the Sky, yet the greatest your step towards Her, the further and further away She is. Jupiter. Woah. I mean, fucking Jupiter. I could spend my whole life figuring out a way to reach Jupiter, and when I'm finally there's she'd be orbiting Sirius.

And I end up in some thread with a grammar nazi retard. I must really retreat from the world of the senses. She just cannot be here.