>>87

I can't see how you can apply "it's not her when it's not her" logic to >>56 or >>71. I can see how you would deduce that they are trolls because the pics are png's (without camera info in exif data); but disregarding that, they certainly aren't high-res enough to immediately see it's not Cracky, and both look quite similar to Cracky's non-artsy, home photos.