xcuse me but wat is dis

wut???

thats...

>>3

It cant be......

>>1

can i hug u plz

>>1

Are my eyes deceiving me? can this be...

OLIVIA????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

THIS CANNOT BE. THIS MUST BE SOME SORT OF SHOOP OR LOOKALIKE

I ....

What are you talking about samefag? It's some awkward shoop.

this has got to fake...she cant forgive us for what we did to her.

BUT IF ISNT OLIVIA I LOVE YOU JUST KNOW THAT

>>1
>>2
>>3
>>4
>>5
>>6
>>7
>>9

samefag

>>10

erm no?

>>10

erm no?

I FUCKING LOVE YOU OLIVIA. Really, I do. I am yours to command.

For heaven's sake, it looks like fucking Gackto

Go troll elsewhere, samefag 'tard

Exif data seems legit. Hot damn. Where have you been, nvm, don't answer that. I don't care as long as you're here now. Life has been hell without you.

>>1

According to legend, Astræa will one day come back to Earth, bringing with her the return of the utopian Golden Age of which she was the ambassador.

>>14 FUCK OFF MERO, AN HERO GET IT RIGHT THIS TIME PUSSY.

>>1
Those are clearly her teeth. Lips, nose and chin are bang on too. Hair style seems different, neck and face seem too thin/long. Collar of shirt is different. Hmmm.

>>18

I agree, but what i find strange is the fact if it is her, why would she just randomley post new images of herself out of the blue?

>>19
I call elaborate shoop. The mouth of the top one could have been taken from this picture (reversed).

>>20
Other mouth?

>>18
Also, the letter 4 is drawn differently.

>>19
Why ask why? Rejoice. As I' said before I'd cheerfully kill you all to have her all to myself, sheesh, bunch of ingrates.

>>23

Whoever posted it, they have us in a frenzy.

>>24
It might have you and all the samefags in frenzy, but Gackto and I are laughing

>>25

V_V

>>24
Frenzy? Hell I'd rate us at a full blown tizzy at this point.

I want to believe ;___;
but if it's not her it's still nice to pretend
but also hurts like hell

It is when all illusions are stripped away that we are cleansed. We are nothing without her in our lives, such truth is never learned without pain. We suffer, as she intended, for our pain gives her pleasure, never doubt this. Pain is the path to truth, suffer it gladly and well, that you may know her in hell.

>>20>>21

This is probably true. Because of that balloon hand, if nothing else.

>>30

On second thought. The montage is probably only on the second pic. It really does look like Gackto in the first pic.

>>30

balloon hand?
herp derp its called holding your hand close to a camera

also, nothing of cracky's original pictures were shooped into the OP's

If this is not her, we have to get used to the fact that there will probabley never be any current, up to date images of olivia.

there is something quite off in this picture

some details seem right, but the ensemble does not

enough so that I dont buy it

anyone who thinks its actaully her is fucking retard. its CLEARLY been photo-shopped heavily. YOU CAN TELL BY SOME OF THE PIXELS.

>>35

Her derp

So... Gackto is shooping pics of himself to pass as new rares? Weird.

>>37

please tell me you're a fucking troll,
the only thing Gackto and cracky have similar are teh eyes, and not even that...

>>37

'facepalm'

we need whoever it is in the OP pic to show their eyes, that would probably confirm.

If it was Crackles, she would have this hole

/thread

>>41

the lips and teeth are definitely of cracky

>>41 its called a dimple.

>>43
sorry, bad english. Still, I think she'd still have it if this was her. Lips and teeth look the same, but there's a terrible lack of dimple there

I have no idea on what to believe.

>>15

>Exif data
>composite PNG image of two different photographs

>>41
You would be correct, but the image cuts off where the dimple would be, so... we can't tell.

without a good number of pictures to provide context and, oh, I dont know, the rest of the face, I wouldnt say either way

but the general way that person smiles in the bottom picture doesnt look familiar at all

I have no doubt it would be if this were real

it's funny either way

funny and wonderful

blasted doubters

>>48

>doesn't look familiar at all

are you lost?

Even if it is her... she looks quite young on the picture?

>>52

true, if it is her it doesn't seem she looks much older at all, but then again, I know a woman in her late 20's that still appears to be only about 16

>>51

even if a lot of things do change with age, the way the muscles pull the cheeks doesnt

I see the resemblance, but there is something off, the angles of those muscle pulls are weird, somehow

I'm not saying it is or it isnt, I'm just saying I'd need more pictiures of the whole face before I would, but honestly, if it was reeally her, I think I would have recognized her already, which is what I meant by familiar

and honestly, who but somebody other than Cracky would come to .71 to post a picture recreating the sailor set and not make it absolutely clear it is her by posting a crop that leaves as many questions as this by only showing parts of the face?

asking the questions answers it, I'd say

>>54

It could look weird for a number of reasons and still be her, but I agree I'm not going to get my hopes up until I see some more.

also, perhaps Cracky wants to leave questions :)

oh u

>>56

i want you :3

>>56

Oh wow, a new rare that wasn't even in the rares list.

>>56

methinks this isn't Cracky but the girl in >>1

>>59
also the samefag in >>2 >>3 >>4 >>5 and so on and so forth

Well holy shit, there is at least one rare up in this motherfucker. Mind = blown

>>56
straps are definetly cracky

>>60

Erm no?

>>56
eyebrows are not cracky

>>64

you're dumb. grand master merovin of the monastic order of cracky chan the queen of the heavens here, with another epic post. I am the foremost cracky expert. a qucick analysis of my crackyarchive shows that her eyebrows adapt from gigantic bushy monstrosities to raw paint and back again, who knwos wtf shes doning with them now. also, i gave up on t urning my wine bottles and opened them

>this thread
>cracky's face when

>>1
but seriously, why so balloon handed?

>>67

Allergic reaction?

>>67

close to camera, perhaps the palm is pushed forward too much and the fingers are back giving it that balloon-ish look.

>>66

corky?

this thread depresses me

>>72

Olivias mum hates this thread.

>>71

moar

>>71
>>56
as far as I can tell these are rares.
they are rares until proven otherwise.

why was it taken down from that tumblr? does it not count as a crackygal? how rude

yum yum

I love how no one over at CH cares to even discuss the possibility of cracky rares

they don't care at all

.71 is love

>>71
moar please ... ):

>>78

Hi there, your newfag is showing. There's absolutely no need to have the same exact posts and discussions on both boards. It's perfectly fine that it's only here.

>>80
There is absolutely no need to have the other board at all.

>>78
It's not people there doesn't want to... the problem is that every time a Cracky thread appears, that Reynolds faggot appears to ruin it. As long as he is able to post there, this board will be immeasurably better.

Fuck off Mero.

>>71
so nice a new one in the family

>>81
Actually there is.

It is there to perpetuate the circlejerk of drama outside of here.

>>85

The Elders will see about that.

PROTIP: There's absolutely no need to discuss this. They are no "rarez". You can try to shoop so hard you want or to imitate her to the detail, it's not her when it's not her. When a rare gets released which is not often (let's say max 4 in a year) you'll see immediately it's legit. That's the way it always was. This lookalikes and badly shooped attempts are just to pass the time and get some entertainment.
Now let this thread finally rot, like kindly suggested in >>66.

>>87

I can't see how you can apply "it's not her when it's not her" logic to >>56 or >>71. I can see how you would deduce that they are trolls because the pics are png's (without camera info in exif data); but disregarding that, they certainly aren't high-res enough to immediately see it's not Cracky, and both look quite similar to Cracky's non-artsy, home photos.

>>88

this, you can't immediately just insist they're not her, I mean, who made you the king?

This thread is proof that the Crackyverse is just full of kids and newfags.

Okay, it's just a cosplay, that's pretty heavily shooped, now I would appreciate it if it could go back up on the crackygals tumblr where I originally submitted it, I did not post it here on .71 o_O;;

>>91
What did the original look like?

need to upload a jpg version

OK, have some srsbiz
http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/85fdb20/

>>90
and don't forget trolls who think they're "old skool" and as such feel they have a right to be patronizing

>>95
that giving too much credit to any troll

of courset's shooped, crackles shooped the background but it's still a real and fresh cracky in front

I reposted it from here http://fuckyeahcrackygals.tumblr.com/, where it disappeared for some reason. I had no idea it would cause such a stir.

Are >>71 and >>56 from a webcam conversation?

great thread or greatest thread

>>100
no

any sloli pics