>>1
sure, but I didnt know what to call it. Someone else refferred to it as the non-sensical gospel in a thread months ago so I assumed that would be an appropriate name. Care to suggest a better one?

>>2
I'm unsure (ugh, wrong thread there). I mean, its the grammars which are convoluted and seem to break down into pieces, but they actually have sense. Its the form that is broken, not the contents, so in some sense its like the opposite.

Anyway, isn't it called

"The Patmos gospel
Apocalypse of the Sky Queen
Gloria in Divum Regina"

?

what is now the "Non-sensical Gospels" is what used to be called the "wish revisited Gospels", or the "Hundred Gospels" or as the author had originally titled each and everyone of them "Gospel of The Sky Queen chapter 1" up until 100

I sometimes called them "the Babelfish Gospels" but I think it was just me

Patmos is derived from it and yes, it does try to have some sense, or more than just babelfished text, anyway

but they are two different things, even though they are both derived from the cc.skyqueen gospels to start with

>>3 the patmos gospel is the patmos gospel fucktard. The nonsense or whatever you want to call it is a different text. Personally I think >>2 should keep the name but change the image on the page to something more suitable.