>>23
Sorry, no. Thanks to his incessant rambling about it, everyone here is familiar with Reynold's masochistic fantasies. They don't make >>21 any less valid. I'm not a psychologist, I can't explain why he's only sexually thrilled by the thought of a woman abusing and humiliating him (although my guess would be it is something to do with his holding himself in even lower esteem than women) yet holds deeply sexist beliefs. In this thread he's repeatedly asserted that women can never fuck men and I just don't see how you can be so blind as to say that such assertions AREN'T explicitly stating that penises are inherently superior to vaginas, that it is physically impossible to have the 'upper hand' during intercourse unless one has a penis, as if no woman had ever sexually assaulted a man.

For months he's also made a hobby out of publicly harassing two girls half his age after they made a misguided attempt to befriend him, so no, fuck you, his misogyny has always been as on display as his masochism.