>>8
A couple of points:

(i) You might try factoring the difference between your IQ and mine into any future estimates that you attempt of the time it takes me to compose a two-hundred-word post (because this one was off by about 25(+) minutes)

(ii) I am, I have to admit, a little non-plussed at the news that someone has bothered to post on a board a long mediocre piece of text from several years back that he didn't even write. I mean...why? But having said that, history is full of examples of responses to negligible or trivial pieces of writing that turned out, in the end, to be themselves neither negligible nor trivial. Nobody has bothered to read Sir John Filmer's "Patriarcha Monarcha" for several hundred years now. John Locke's "First Treatise of Government" is on Political Science syllabuses all over the world. Very few people have ever heard of David Strauss and "Der Alte und der Neue Glaube". Most philosophy graduates still know the first of the "Untimely Meditations", in which Nietzsche attacks it.

But enough already, I think. Crackyfags are illiterate malevolent boring idiots, whether here or on CH, it makes little difference. I'll leave you to activities more suited to your capacities than intelligent discussion of the semantic peculiarities of online discourse - like moronic sniggering persecution of the few teenage girls who have been so ill-advised as to allow themselves to become objects of attention in circles like these.