Lovely.

thats quite an interesting lookalike.

>>3

Indeed it is.

but its only lookalike

>>5
Keep thinking that

I hope to god Olivia wouldn't go and get one of those hideous nose rings

Looks more like a shorthaired Beckii Cruel.

Blind idorts.

>>8 I would argue that you're the blind one. Beckii Cruel has extremely thin legs. It's not Beckii. Also the hair while somewhat similar, is completely different.

See here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O25nv7_aOrE&feature=related

and I agree with >>2 it is a lovely picture.

>>9

I was taking the piss, idort.

>>10

Obviously.

who the fuck cares, either way

>>1

DUDE. That could like totally be her. SRSLY.

There have been several rares/"lookalikes" (not actually lookalikes) posted in the past half a year and none of you faggots knew it was her, you don't know your queen when you see her. shame on all of you.

>>14
You're so full of shit.

It's possible that among some of the more inconclusive, awkwardly angled, blurry lo-res pics that were posted might turn out to be her, of course, but talk is cheap...

You're going to have to do a lot better than that.

>>14

>shame on all of you.

Not me. I can list them for you if you like:

stripey socks

stupid keyboard

ooh kinky...cuffs

ouchies my knees

Who was that long haired masked lady

hey look at that chin and polo shirt

day of the dead bowtie and dat chin again

canklesockfail

I'm thinking Arby's

Of course there may be one or two that I missed not including this one, let me know. Feel free to post them all here to really rub it in.

u mad?

>>18

>Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

>>19

derp derp

>>20

Derpiouser and derpiouser.

>>21

goddamnnit i are the derpiest derpeousist.

how u outsmarts me?

>>21

Sweaty nipples

People are not going to shout out the fact that they know a picture is of Cracky...we'll keep it to ourselves and masturbate daily over the image as we think no-one else has realised it's her.

>>24
speak for yourself

>>25

I didn't hear you shouting at how a rare was posted, you just let it go by.

>>26
talk is cheap

I see no rare, and wouldnt fap to it if I did, I would also gladly post any rare I would find so, again, speak for yourself

Can anyone repost all the alleged rares here for verification/scrutiny? Would appreciate it.

>>28

I'll post what I have saved.

>>35

Becca is Becca.

>>29>>30
Both Lia.

I think 34 is already an accepted uncommon, both not really a rare, 32 is clearly not her while all the others are not conclusive one way or the other

find the rest of their set, a known picture with a common prop or it will stay that way

this is just another tempest in a drinking glass

>>35
That's not Cracky, that's just an odious porcine whore who looks like a fucking old man.

>>40

Lol'd, i love you.

>>35
Ewww no Becca, nobody wants your shit

How the hell does everybody know who Becca is? Is she relevant in the liaverse? Or was she posting on the Cracky boards long ago?

>>43
Consider yourself lucky.

>>43

She is an evil bitch sent by tacgnol to pussy whip pathetic admins and have them shut down crackyboards.

>>43

*Crackyverse

>>46

No, I meant liaverse. Is she a person only liafags know about, or does all the crackyverse know about her and I'm too late to the party?

>>45

Oh, she's that 'Suede's gf' figure?

>>48
If by 'gf' you mean 'cocktease who emotionally abuses him and his friends', sure.

>>47

What relation does she have to Lia?

>>50
She was a close friend of her and appeared in many of her photos.

>>31

This is cracky. Confirmed by scar on arm.

>>52
it only confirms it could be her, no more, no less...

>>51

Becca isn't in any of Lia's photos. What have you been smoking?

>>51

You, Sir, are a fucking spastic.

>>53
lrn2 the skyqueens thumb
fgt

>>56

"fgt"? Really?

This child needs help, STAT!

>>57
awesomefaec.jpg

lololol
but that is her thumb

>>56
you need to learn the difference between consistant and conclusive

...and to grow the fuck up, obviously

>>95

impressive spelling, dude

>>31>>32>>34

these ones are cracky. the rest are not.

>>31 is also taken by an Olympus u-miniD, Stylus v (Unless somebody edited its exif or something).

>>31 may or may not be Olivia, you'll need more than your "opinion" or "feeling" to make it Olivia. Context, picture of her in these clothes or appartment which only figures in this one pic

it is inconclusive either way, it could very well be her but if you dont have more info or pics, no one can tell with certitude other than what stems from his subjective convictions

>>32 is not Olivia, the pattern of the four incisors is wrong, shame on you

it is conclusive, it simply cannot be her

>>34 I think has already been accepted as her, because I think it was released with other similar pictures from a common source, I dont know enough about that to say, but your insistance on it is suspect, I think it now needs to be reexamined...

regardless of all that, fuck your endless drama war, none of these are recent, it's not even the first time we seen them, argued about them or deemed them unimportant

>>31

if you can't tell that's her arm, her wrist, her fingers then you should be ashamed.
By the way, exif is right.

>>64
you can but only because you want to, what I am telling you is you cant tell either way on that sole picture

but since you want to hash it out again and again, fine

a scar half healed being the same size as when it was fresh is a bit odd in itself, but okay, that's as consistant as scars can be, I guess, but still inconclusive

the shape of a thumb seen in perspective? I'd want more pictures to say but let's say it's another consistency, albeit an even less conclusive one

then there is the clothes, the prop ant the locale, all three inconsistant, but that's not very conclusive either

all in all, a good probablity, the key word still being inconclusive, especially since there is no source, no context and nothing else linking the picture to Olivia than your belief that it is her

that's just not enough for me

by contrast, >>32 is conclusively inconsistant, and clearly so, that one I would be ashamed to not be certain about...

>>65

>a scar half healed being the same size as when it was fresh is a bit odd in itself, but okay, that's as consistant as scars can be, I guess, but still inconclusive [sic]

It's what's known as a hypertrophic scar, something not all that uncommon amongst cutters, look it up sometime.

Interesting thing about ignorance, it can be addressed and ameliorated with appropriate access to a source of information and a willingness to learn, stupidity; particularly the willful variety, is a another matter entirely.

Do try to avoid stating your opinions as fact, they are after all not incontrovertible, and as such, care should be taken not appear, well... asinine.

Also, while allowances are made for the multilingual crowd, there really is no excuse to let things like spelling, punctuation and grammar go by the wayside, that's just lazy.

anything to keep a flamewar going