>>70
In this case because envy and furious humiliation has led you to post things that you cannot possibly know, and know that you cannot possibly know.
I'd mention that I have attended performances of "The Ring" in three countries, and have loved and listened to it for thirty years, but you would doubtless then reveal to the board yet MORE of these details about what I do and do not know, and what I have and have not done, which you are miraculously privy to, and - to everyone's gleeful satisfaction - "prove me wrong".
I think you know yourself - if you're not even more vain and deluded than I believe you to be - that I would run absolute "Rings" around you - if you'll excuse the awful pun - if we ever actually began a discussion of "what the Ring is all about" (a question to which there is no answer anyway, since we are talking about a work which was composed over a space of thirty years and the basic philosophical conception of which was altered about halfway through, with no real attempt to revise the earlier strata).
I'm sure that such a discussion would interest nobody anyway. Still if anyone WERE interested in just how laughably uneven a contest such a discussion would be, they would only have to note that you get the accepted designation of one of the best-known sequences of Sprechgesang in "Die Walkuere" wrong due to the fact that you haven't mastered the gender of one of the words that are usually prominently included in the vocabulary lists of first-year German language primers (i.e. what Wotan sings - since Wagner assumed that this Germanic god, unlike you, COULD speak German - is "DER alte Sturm, die alte Mühe")
You have not "taken the time" to listen to "The Ring" and would not have been equipped to understand or appreciate even a fraction of it if you had.
You're a lying, bluffing bullshitter, puffed up with your own petty vanity and self-regard, like just about everyone involved in this sad, notoriously hollowly pretentious "community".