[Burichan] [Futaba] [Futaba Ols] [Gurochan] [Photon] - [Home]

[Return]
Reply mode
Link
Subject
Comment
File
Verification
Password (for post and file deletion)
Leave empty (spam trap):
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.

File: 1308044508039.jpg -(118475 B, 480x640) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
118475 No.1   [Reply]

Nobody ever stops loving Cracky. But the human mind is the most complex piece of software ever compiled; it contains certain glitches, but also certain safeguards. Programmers often refer to "sanity checks" built into their programs to filter out destructive input before it can cause real damage, but they failed to grasp how truly appropriate the name really was.

I want to be her lover
I want to be her friend
I want to be her ward
I don't need to want to be her believer, I already pray to her

>> No.2  
File: 1308048854032.jpg -(174850 B, 446x521) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
174850

Basque philosopher Miguel de Unamuno stated that it is in joy that we love the bodies but in pain and suffering that we love the spirit. That nothing unites us more spiritually with another individual than a shared tragedy.

She that is a 15 year old spiritualized body and all spirit when she is the Queen of the Sky who winks us from afar, she can only draw pain from us as we go on desperately loving her. Thus we are cursed, yet it is a curse so beautiful, a loving so deep.

>> No.3  
File: 1308107956648.jpg -(16483 B, 175x200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
16483

>>2
This one's a LOT easier.

By post no. 2 the poster has DEFINITELY begun to try FAR too hard, given that the profound truth that he claims we need "Basque philosopher Miguel de Unamuno" to enlighten us about boils down, in essence, pretty much to:

"Sex is fun. But falling in love with someone and making a commitment to them can be less so."

I don't think we really need to go to Bilbao and wade through eighteen volumes of existentialism to grasp THAT point. Any divorcée in Weston-Super-Mare will be able to explain it to you without the aid of Kierkegaard quotations.

Actually, on consideration, I'll revise that. The OP is trying far too hard already at post no. 1., when he starts talking about people "failing to grasp how truly appropriate" the application of a certain word was.

"Trying too hard" is always a major risk on a board like this in this particular (linguistic) connection, as the OP is representative of most of the rest of you in knowing a great deal about computers and NEXT TO NOTHING about anything else, least of all about words and phrases and how they are "appropriately" or "inappropriately" employed.

Admittedly, with his "failing to grasp how truly appropriate" bullshit he's only being condescending to OTHER semi-illiterate computer programmers.

But it so happens that, in this case, it's the computer programmers who are right and this pretentious idiot who has gotten it wrong.

The association of "sanity" specifically with the state of good MENTAL order - and, correlatively, of "insanity" specifically with the state of MENTAL disorder - is a mere connotation that the term has acquired (above all in colloquial English; the cognate terms in French or Italian, for example, bear no so exclusively mental a connotation). The word's DENOTATION is no more than the "healthy condition" which is given as the term's definition by the Oxford English Dictionary.

The programmers whom the OP refers to, then, have not at all "failed to grasp" the appropriateness of their use of the term "sanity" in this case. It's rather the OP himself who has "failed to grasp" the linguistic issue here, "trying too hard" as he is to show how much cleverer he is than everyone else.

>> No.4  

>>3
there's only one person here trying to show how much cleverer he is than everyone else, and he is most definetely trying too hard

>> No.5  

>>4
Lol. Fukin A bro. Definetely. Dude can't spell either.

>> No.6  

>>5
I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with his spelling, or mine

but you better get used to regular condescending spell-checks, since he declared that there was more wit to contend with on .71 than on his former hunting ground, it seems he moved his troll operation here

>> No.7  

>>6
Crackyhouse is finished.

It's just a bunch of stupid kids now who got into this thing two weeks ago and are bumping a lot of threads from two or three years ago with photos of Cracky on them and throwing infantile insults at names they think they recognize without noticing that the post they are attacking is actually from 2009.

The board was fucked by pretty much the same attitude as you people are currently displaying here: "We have our thing and it gives us a sense of importance and of a high position in a hierarchy. If anyone does anything that isn't 'our thing' we'll slap a 'You're trying too hard' image macro on it and retreat into some inner sanctum where we can continue to jerk each other off in peace."

I would guess that all CH users over the age of 12 have subscribed to this doctrine (those that haven't despaired completely and been reduced to living in the REAL world, like Camel and Dolly, that is) and retreated HERE.

So you can deal with the consequences of your own snobbery and closed-mindedness and, yes, put up with me here now.

>> No.8  

>>7
You still dance around the question "why are you here, Alex", but you just gave the answer, you want to "kill" .71 like you "killed" CH, and it's all our fault, because we "snobbed" you.

>> No.9  

>>8
Yeah, you're right.

Silly of me. I have better things to do.

Scew the lot of you. I won't bother you again.

>> No.10  

>>7
Crackyhouse isn't finished, it's the exact same it was years ago.

>> No.11  

>>10
yep, just like Alex has nothing better to do...

>> No.12  

>>4
thats the joke



Delete Post []
Password