Well Alex and Jeff are the only people able to do that atm so far as I know, so I'm assuming either Alex has troll's remorse and deleted all his faggotry or Jeff finally got sick of his bullshit.

There was some good stuff in them posts too. BAAAAW!

One of the two apparently regretted Alex's proclamation of the death of CH...

I can't believe that anybody here in the "holy of holies" has actually bothered to REPLY to some idiot crawling in here whingeing and whining about how he and his buddies have not been allowed to shit up a board with endless threads announcing that a fifty-year-old guy who isn't even interested in Cracky is a pedo, a queer, a cunt etc. etc.

But as you ARE entertaining this stupidity, let me provide a brief glossary for use in reading these posts

"All the stuff" = two or three pages of tedious repetitive flaming involving people posting pictures of some guy I've never met in my life and captioning them "This is Alex Reynolds. He's a pedo who works in a library in London" or things of that ilk.

"Alex's bullshit" = my tendency, when I notice that (as happens periodically) the first three or four pages of Crackyhouse are filled almost exclusively with shit about me and what a cunt I am, to throw all that shit in the trash where it belongs (or at least where it belongs more than it does on a board allegedly about Cracky).

And most worryingly of all, we have, I suppose, to conclude from all this that, despite the OP's attempt to prove his Crackyfag credentials by using a Cracky image macro, he genuinely believes that

"the plot" (i.e. "what it's all about") in the Cracky community = baiting and repeating infantile boring jokes about a 50-year-old ex-professor, and running around whingeing and complaining about someone's having "lost the plot" when they've prevented him and his buddies from doing so.

So cue the inevitable second stage of whingeing now about how one of the pointless baiting threads that I deleted maybe included a photo of Cracky, so I "delete Cracky threads" etc. etc. (I think the post at the top of this thread is proof enough that a post with a Cracky image attached does not a Cracky post make; the cat ears are there, but the post itself consists entirely of a Cartman-like insistence on the OP's right to go on and on about stuff that has got fuck all to do with Cracky).

If .71 wants to play host to this sort of shit, well, you're free to do so. The front page of CH, though, consists presently - unless these idiots have started smearing their "haha you cant stop us pedo faggot" shit all over it again while I've been writing this - at least predominantly of posts that are actually about Cracky. I would have thought that you would welcome that and put these morons straight.

Somehow I wonder whether you will, though.

Take this punk DOWN.

>>6
I'm really in two minds about whether to interpret that as the gesture of support that I requested or as someone else joining in the attack on me.

For the former interpretation speaks the fact that, at age 52, I'm really far too old to be appropriately referred to as a "punk".

For the latter speak two circumstances:

(i) if the term is being used in the sense that it enjoys in prison parlance, it's true that I DO take it up the ass from physically rather more imposing males on a fairly regular basis.

(ii) the last music album I purchased WAS "Never Mind The Bollocks, Here's The Sex Pistols" in the summer of 1977.

I'll be swayed by the almost universal affection that I know to exist for me here on .71 and go with the former interpretation.

...and STAY down.

>>5

>hey Alex why do you shit up crackyhouse?
>"because it amuses me and I am bored"
>hey Alex why did you delete a bunch of posts if you say they amused you?
>...

Alex is the worst kind of hypocrite

"Comment too long. Click here to view the full text."

Only one man can do this...
(pic in no way related, BTW)

>>10
Well, whatever...

I didn't drag this shit in here. You did. I imagine that the only people participating in this thread are the people who've come here from Crackyhouse anyway. The people who use .71 are taking the correct attitude to all this and ignoring your ridiculous complaints that you haven't been allowed to engage in infantile irrelevant shitposting.

Crackyhouse is finished because, for reasons connected with the history and the dynamic of the community that I don't understand, no group of people equivalent to the .71 people who are ignoring this thread currently exists on Crackyhouse.

If CH has posters at all at present, these consist, if not exclusively, then at least predominantly of people like you, who have (despite the image macros) only a very slight interest in Cracky and a much greater interest in infantile "pwning and baiting".

I think a board can stand a degree of that - which, yes, can, for a while, be "amusing" - but when it begins to become a board's exclusive content, then it's time to shut that board down.

I'm not seriously trying to "rescue" Crackyhouse by deleting this pointless shit. There's nothing there to be "rescued", as no intelligent or interesting people, and no one genuinely interested in the Cracky thing, go there anymore. But I'll delete shit now and again until Jeff decides to take his admin powers back, or - a much wiser option, in my view - closes down a dead and empty ex-board that is becoming a place for random idiots to squat and shit in.

Away and fling shite at the moon, you mad pedo bastard.

>>12
Why does it offend you so much that crackyhouse has so many newfags?

Amongst the pwning and baiting posts of flaming morons that were deleted was a post by Alex that said that he thought the Cracky community was comprised of idiots that he found amusing to come insult whenever he got bored.

There was also a mention of how his last episode at .71 ended up in (insert standard Reynolds' condescending and insulting charactherization) idiocy.

Same as usual, Alex got goaded into a flamewar, said more than he'd care to have repeated and is now wondering why no one comes to his rescue, assuming all the smart ones are ignoring this thread, all his support being silent.

Well, he has the support of all the people in the world, all 7 billions of them. Who are we to whine if he gets his amusement at our idiotic expense...

>>15
Yes. Exactly. The threads I deleted were threads pretty much of the sort I've deleted there in the past: threads about ME and MY VIEWS and how much people hate ME and so on, with little or no mention of the topic or topics the board is supposed to be about.

There's really not much point in discussing how those sorts of threads arise, i.e. "who starts them", as we could argue all year about that (you suggest yourself that it takes at least two to make a quarrel when you talk about me being "goaded").

But I really don't understand how anyone could seriously object to their being deleted once things reach the point where the entire front page of a Cracky board consists of nothing else.

The idea that there were things in them "that I don't care to have repeated" is one of the most laughable things I've read in my life, given that just about everybody in the Cracky community knows already that I have a low opinion of you and hates me for it.

I deleted the threads because they were pointless boring crap we've seen a thousand times before that had no relevance to the board.

If the "newfags" at Crackyhouse feel that I acted selfishly, arrogantly or unfairly, the way to prove that is to post something OTHER than infantile irrelevant flaming that I would have no reason or right to delete.

Looking at Crackyhouse in the three or four hours since the deletion I see that - despite said fags having mustered the energy to make several posts here - their total contribution to CH consists of two posts, that read:

Alex is a faggot pedophile

and

Alex please stop being a faggot pedophile.

I rest my case.

>>16

>given that just about everybody in the Cracky community knows already that I have a low opinion of you and hates me for it.

Fair enough but now it's somewhere you cant delete and cant deny.

Because when you say flamewars bore you, we can see that you admitted that what you do when you are bored is amusing yourself at the expense of idiots I.E. participate in flamewars with Crackyfags.

Well, I just wanted to say that the the discrepancy between the behavior you try to convince every one you have been showing and your now deleted contradictory admissions is not lost on everybody, and that given your years of flaming amusement at crapping up CH until proclaiming it dead, effectively moving your amusement venue here, I shudder for the future.

>Yes. Exactly. The threads I deleted were threads pretty much of the sort I've deleted there in the past: threads about ME and MY VIEWS and how much people hate ME and so on, with little or no mention of the topic or topics the board is supposed to be about.

They are most definitely threads wherein you find some post directly related to the topic of the board, which you frequently admit you have no interest in, and proceed to insult the poster for no other reason than to demonstrate your superiority as a middle-aged pedophile.

>There's really not much point in discussing how those sorts of threads arise, i.e. "who starts them", as we could argue all year about that

Yes, you make sure to delete any thread that makes it 100% clear that you are the instigator in these arguments so that you can go on claiming to be the victim of unjustified hate and antagonism. Not surprisingly, you don't delete the single-post threads that merely defame you (i.e. describe you perfectly), furthering your transparently deceitful claim to innocent victim-hood.

>If the "newfags" at Crackyhouse feel that I acted selfishly, arrogantly or unfairly, the way to prove that is to post something OTHER than infantile irrelevant flaming that I would have no reason or right to delete.

You start flame wars in response to posts that are actually on topic, derailing discussions among the user base so you can insult everyone's intelligence, and then adopt an attitude of being the only one willing and able to have "intelligent discourse" and avoid the flame wars that you claim so vehemently to detest. Do you not realize that it is abundantly clear that YOU are the infantile one, completely incapable of shit-slinging for no other reasons than attention and ego inflation? Fuck off and die already. No one can tolerate your egomania, hypocrisy, and pathological duplicity.

>>18
Even on the optimistic assumption (or pessimistic one, depending on your point of view) that a couple of Cracky-interested people here on .71 are casting an occasional bored and disgusted glance at this thread, you're only proving my point and also proving that YOU'RE the "duplicitous" ones.
I didn't bring this disgraceful, tedious, boring, irrelevant thread here to .71 and would have been perfectly happy to drop it and let it die last night. But no, posts 17 and 18 are the usual untiring (but very tiring) analyses of my character, my ill intentions etc, rolling unstoppably on even though no one is fucking interested.
Meanwhile, on CH, these mythical "on-topic" posts that you keep banging on about remain, today as yesterday, conspicuous by their absence.

>>11

I lol'd

>>19

> you're only proving my point and also proving that YOU'RE the "duplicitous" ones

Are those bad jokes? Your "point" is, and correct me if I'm wrong, that no one produces intelligent and/or relevant discussion on CH except for you. However, your exclusive contributions to the board are insults to individual posters and the community as a whole, or pompous monologues on a topic of your choice that no one else gives a rat's ass about, but which you claim are somehow tangentially related to either Cracky or the posts you respond to, which they seldom are. Oh, and by all means, explain how anything that was recently posted to call you on your bullshit consists of duplicity, especially in relation to your torrent of lies.

>rolling unstoppably on even though no one is fucking interested.

EVERYONE is interesting in having a place to discuss Cracky without having to worry about you shitting all over whatever thread you feel inclined to destroy with your walls of irrelevant and uninteresting text or your childish need to express how frustrated you are with the inferiority of all the people who frequent the board that you refuse to leave, no matter how much everyone wants you to and how little interest you have in its contents (beyond your constant dick-waving).

>Meanwhile, on CH, these mythical "on-topic" posts that you keep banging on about remain, today as yesterday, conspicuous by their absence.

Fuck you. You deleted two threads where people had been discussing Cracky, presumably because they demonstrated your hostility to anything that isn't some form of praise directed at you, or because they simply weren't up to your standards of including the minimum quota of garbage that you produce to flatter yourself like an unloved child.

>>21
Look. It's quite easy for you to prove your case. Instead of posting attack after attack on me here, go to Crackyhouse and post something that is inarguably ABOUT the topic of the board, as are, for example, all the other threads currently appearing on the front page of THIS board.
I'm afraid bumping old threads from two or three years ago and writing "Cool. I luv Cracky" underneath them won't do it. That only proves that Crackyhouse had a reason for existing two or three years ago, not that it has one for existing now.
But as I say, I don't see you doing that nor do I believe you are really capable of or even interested in posting about Cracky or Cracky-relevant topcs. All that has appeared on CH in the last eighteen hours are two "fuck off pedo" posts and an announcement that it's Lavagel's birthday - which is not relevant either, but would have been kind of sweet if it was really from her (I seriously doubt it is). Oh and a few lines of vague, possibly Cracky-related mysticism, which I would have no objection to, if it went anywhere.
So put your keyboard where your mouth is or shut up.

>>20
Oh, and for the guy who "lol'd" over Caligula - whom I'm willing to bet he didn't recognize and wouldn't have understood the significance of even if he had - here's some more material for subtle comedic delectation:

Fart!

>>23
Rofl....oh stop brah your like killing me..."fart"...ha yeh that fagot dude does like stinky farts allday I bet lolol

>>22

A newfag perspective:

I started lurking on CH in November last year, made my first post on there about 3 months back only to be shot down and sneered at by yourself, Alex. I can handle criticism, and even outright abuse (this is the interwebz, after all), but you were a cheeky bastard who went that extra mile to point out my deficiencies and lack of 'education', therefore I've decided, upon further observation of your character traits and ways of dealing with conflict, that you were not having a bad day or whatever, you are like this 24/7. These observations proved to be true as you ranted, raved, and whined to anyone and everyone so I feel quite justified giving it back, and laughing when you squirm.

Time to put your HDD in the microwave, I've called the cops regarding your site, in connection to the possession and distribution of child porn. Happy now?

anhero.exe

>>22
More blatant lies. Two of the threads you deleted were on the first page, and had recent discussions, not conceited monologues, between users about Cracky. Perhaps your asinine hyperbole of them consisting of "Cool. I luv Cracky," is what you believe justified their deletion, but where the fuck do you get off to delete the discussions of other's when there is no recent record of you posting anything related to Cracky (other than insulting everyone in the board for harboring an interest in her)?

>I don't see you doing that nor do I believe you are really capable of or even interested in posting about Cracky or Cracky-relevant topcs

I was participating in those threads, since I actually DO have an interest in using the board for what it is intended. You've repeatedly stated that you don't. It really doesn't matter if the posting isn't up to your standard of haughty arrogance, since you don't even care about the topic, you just care about bragging and insulting. So just. fucking. LEAVE.

You think we're all intellectually below you, and you don't have any interest in Cracky.

So. Just. Fucking. LEAVE.

>>25
Oh God NO NO!!! I take it all back, I'll do anything you say PLEEEEEESE don't call the cops oh PLEEEEEESE don't.
I didn't realize when I started throwing my weight around that I would end up coming up against someone like YOU - who are proving NOT ONLY that you are a guy that NO ONE FUCKS WITH but also, with your threats to avenge yourself by going and telling a lot of bullshits lies to the (mythical, I believe) Internetz Police, that you are the person of honour and manly rectitude that I dared to suggest you were not.

FFS I'm not Jessie Slaughters inbred dad, you dick... read and weep...

As a result of your telephone call to the Metropolitan Police Service Child Abuse Imagery Information Line, the police and other agencies will launch an investigation into the alleged sexual abuse and exploitation. The telephone number is 020 7161 3871

Party's over. U dun goof'd.

>>28
Well, that's certainly one in the eye for Alex Reynolds.
There he was insisting that this guy and people like him were just peevish little egomaniacs intent solely on proving that they had the biggest balls on the Internetz and didn't really give even the rudiments of a shit about the boards that they claimed to have an objective interest in posting on - and now this "blatant lie" has been shown up once and for all as such by this utterly selfless and entirely non-vindictive action on the part of the Anon in question.
Pity he's going to jail now and will probably not enjoy internet-access facilities sufficient to issue as lengthy a public apology as is certainly here deserved.

>>29
Cute. Did Trey Parker or Matt Stone teach you how to figure it all out by just sitting back and feeling superior for not having an opinion, or even looking in to anything being said? Man, brings back memories of what an edgy and smart kid I was in middle school. Why argue when it's so uncool?

>>30
Why the fuck should I argue with a guy who's just announced to the world that his idea of "working something out" is, when he's been prevented from posting a lot of irrelevant shit on an image-board, running to the police and denouncing the board as a purveyor of child pornography (presumably ommiting to mention the fact that he's only pissed off because he wasn't allowed to post on this alleged "child pornography" board himself)?
If you are the poster in question, then I find it very hard to believe that you were "cool and edgy" even in middle school. Snitching and lying to teacher about groups of kids who won't let you play with them hardly ranks very high, particularly at middle school, among "cool" ways to behave.

>>31

sukc it down

>>31
I didn't post that, you fucking retard. Hypocrites with narcissistic personality disorder actually have a way of making LOTS of enemies, as amazing as that may seem to you. Oh, and I don't think that poster can really be compared to a kid "snitching and lying to teacher about groups of kids who won't let you play," as much as it is the equivalent snitching and lying to the teacher about a lone sociopath/pariah who will not leave all the people who hate him the fuck alone. I'm one of them, and though I'm not the snitch, I share his hate.

>>31
But, to be honest with you, I suppose I should inform you about the person you're flaming and quarrelling with here - and should also, on the basis of this information, withdraw from this whole business once and for all and deal with my boredom some other way.
I'm actually far too old to learn anything from "South Park", much as I admired the show up to about Series 8. I'm probably ten or fifteen years older than Parker and Stone, who are no spring chickens.
So what the fuck am I doing spending yet ANOTHER year arguing with not-very-bright 17-to-20-year-olds?
A VERY good question. It's "bullying", I suppose, even if there is no conscious intention to engage in bullying on my part, because there's just such a ludicrous disparity between me and the people I flame with on the intellectual, moral and every other level.

It's not actually Lavagel's birthday - everyone knows she was born on December 25th in a Stockton, CA. whorehouse with no crib for her bed except a Sybian saddle - but I shall pretend it is, and therefore an auspicious occasion for me to give up this nonsense and devote myself TO HER SERVICE ALONE.

>>34
Go, leave. Keep telling yourself that you are not a slimy, immature, pathetic piece of shit of unremarkable intelligence, whose only basis for believing in his superiority is the fact that he tells himself he is so. Just don't do it here.

HURRRR DURRRRR, I'M A MORALLY AND INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR PERSON WHO PICKS FIGHTS ON THE INTERNET, AND AFTER A FEW RETORTS RESORTS EXCLUSIVELY TO AD HOMINEM ATTACKS AND PRACTICED DETACHMENT FROM THE ARGUMENT. AREN'T I SO SUPERIOR FOR SCOURING THE INTERNET FOR PEOPLE TO INSULT? AREN'T I INTELLIGENT FOR RUNNING AWAY FROM ARGUMENTS DUE TO A NEUROLOGICAL INCAPACITY TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENT, VALID LOGIC?

Piss off, you pathetic, decaying old pedophile. At least my ad hominem attacks hit their mark.

>>34

Can we have that promise in writing? Actually, never mind, just forget that last request... hope you like porridge, Alex. ;)

wait what? I just finished reading this thread... when did Alex become a pedo? (not saying he wasnt always one but when did we find this out?) Did he post cp or something? I have been away from the crackyverse for about a week and seem to have missed some drama.

Au pays des aveugles, les borgnes sont rois.

You flame on CH and now .71 because you are convinced the population there is idiotic, and as such, not capable of shooting you down in flames like the assembly of your peers regularly do, when they bother to even throw a bored glance at your output.

You are a mediocre scholar that needs to go torment high school kids to feel the superiority he believes he is entitled to but cant find in his own field.

This is your amusement, your boredom alleviating mechanism.

What's ridiculous is that you should complain about those high school kids not thanking you for setting them straight instead of universally rejecting you.

For a smart man, it sure was stupid to expect any other result.

Again the same tactic of separating the Crackyverse between the idiots that do post, and the smarter ones that dont post because of their contemptuous high value of themselves.

A trend only witnessed by Reynolds that wouldnt, couldnt, shouldnt be construed as an effort to divide the community or to hammer a wedge between the elite and the hoipoloi....

Bound to fail in here, there is no elite, just us namefag hating anons. We didnt survive the nukes to be bullied by you.

veri: chien

>>37
I imagine it was found out and proven with the greatest imaginable degree of logical stringency and rigour somewhere in the course of all the non-ad-hominem "argument" that the posters on either side of you keep insisting I "run away" from.

I mean, if it's shouted over and over with SUCH insistence, then the proof of it MUST be in these reams and reams of hate-posts SOMEWHERE - if only in accordance with the principle laid down by that fellow the French-speaking poster above is doubtless referring to when he makes the rather cryptic statement that "because he's paid by a woman called Abigail, Borges is allowed to be king", who wrote, in his "Library of Cracky":

"The Cracky board is total, and its pages register all the possible combinations of the twenty-odd orthographical symbols. They contain everything: the minutely detailed history of the future; the archangels' autobiographies; the faithful and true account of Alex Reynolds's life as a pedophile; thousands and thousands of false accounts of Alex Reynolds's life as a pedophile; the demonstrations of the fallacy of these false accounts; the demonstration of the fallacy of the true account; the Gnostic gospel of Basilides etc. etc. etc."

This quotation from Jorge Luis Bertrand de Borgne-in-the-USA is, moreover, officially certified Cracky-board-relevant because there is documented proof that Cracky tried to sell two books by Borges on the Internet in 2008 - two books which did NOT include the collection in which "The Library of Babel" is contained, ergo this collection remained in her possession, ergo Alex Reynolds is a pedo, ergo cogito verum gaudium res severa est.

>>40

Alex, the only reason you post here is to express your animosity and contempt at surrogates for all the people you wished you could openly insult but cant, for whatever reason.

If it isnt obvious to you, it is to everybody else who has observed your destructive behavior for a couple of years.

>>40
Struck a nerve, obviously...

Alex. As you have read so much and are so intelligent, this gentleman obviously needs no introduction. He's gonna be your new neighbour. Enjoy.

>>41
OK, now you're stretching the limits even of MY un-Cracky-cultured credulity.
Cracky had NO SENSE OF HUMOUR?
She was a Jew, for Yahweh's sake! How did her little ginger genes survive four thousand years of persecution if she sticks up her pert rouged nose at a series of really quite excellent even if somewhat erudite jokes and misidentifies them as "wails of despair"?
Sounds like a case of one too many visits with Mum and Dad to HaKotel HaMa'aravi, if you ask me.

>>43
Yeah. The tone of wounded, disoriented, desperate scrabbling to recover his dignity in post no. 40 is quite unmistakable - for anyone who is too dim and emotionally constipated to know a joke when it bites them in the ass.

Once you've dragged that much shit from outside, there is no jokes that can clear the air...

Intelligent, cultured or not, there is no way anybody would have a civil conversation with somebody who regularly goes out of his way to be a jerk towards everybody, just because he can.

>>46
Mmh, the normal reaction for someone not on the defensive would be to say something like "touché" but for Alex it is to make desperate jokes that try to deflect the reality contained therein...

Nerve indeed.

CH has seen it, now it's bounceme's turn

>>48
Touchac? Wasn't he that black fellow that Jeff admires so much who went around raping women and shooting children until he was finally shot himself by some guy called Giganto the Dwarf or something?
Why the fuck would I want to say anything involving HIM?

>>50
HAHAHAHAH TUPAC AND TOUCHAC OMG SO FUNNY HAHA WE FORGIVE NOW YOU MADE A FUNNY JOKE OMG LOL AHAA.

former alex supporter from CH here. I used to post bravo and stuff when he made interesting posts.

I was wrong to do that and I repent. I am sorry. That is all.

>>52

Bottom line is: Alex is here only to amuse himself at our expense.

Just keep that in mind in your dealings with him.

>>52

I used to like Alex's CH posts as well. Now (for about the last two months) all he seems to be doing is indeed snarling at everything he doesn't like in his utopia of an imageboard.

>>55

I STILL LIKE ALEX'S POSTS.

EVEN MORE because he is blasting all you summerfags, so I don't have to waste my precious time doing it. THANK YOU ALEX REYNOLDS, from the bottom of my black heart, I thank thee.

>>55

this is related to black cock in camel's cunt which has infected her then been transmitted to Jeff through physical contact.

>>56
The term "summerfags" doesn't apply to a half dead "super sekrit" cracky board.
Gb24chan

>>56

by implying that this place has summerfags you are the summerfag.

>>56
You are a lazy ass and an idiot.

Yes, there are some 'newer' Crackyfags that dont get all the intricacies of the Crackyverse, and are a bit disruptive because of it, but they have the excuse of not having been here that long.

They still are not as disruptive as Alex has been over the years, and especially the last few months. It's not like he is only blasting "summerfags"...

I would not accept a guard dog in my house if it couldnt learn to be house clean within two years. Who would want to dodge all the turds in the corridor and the lingering smell of shit just to avoid having to answer the door from time to time, but a lazy ass and an idiot.

>>61
true post.

>>62 small price to pay for a nigger free home.

>>63 buy a gun fgt

>>61
Seconded.
>>63
If that was a metaphor, I'd really like to know what sort of undesirables you think Alex keeps out of the Crackyverse. In fact, he is such an insufferable faggot, he can really only make the whole place way fucking worse. He drives off anyone unaccustomed to his particular brand of narcissistic asshole, and somehow validates human garbage like >>56 and yourself (if you did indeed mean that as a metaphor).

If not, feel free to disregard.

>>64 Amerifag detected = Nigger.

>>63
I'd rather have a house cleaned dog instead, or answer the door myself.

Self-respect doesnt come out a dog's ass.

>>67 yet ur still after the same bitch six years l8r. lololololol

>>68
I'm not after anybody, I'm just answering the door...

So, why are you here, again? To leave a turd in the corridor?

>>69 you are in violation of the two post per day quota, cease and desist at once this board isn't supposed to move fgts.

>>70