>>15
Yes. Exactly. The threads I deleted were threads pretty much of the sort I've deleted there in the past: threads about ME and MY VIEWS and how much people hate ME and so on, with little or no mention of the topic or topics the board is supposed to be about.

There's really not much point in discussing how those sorts of threads arise, i.e. "who starts them", as we could argue all year about that (you suggest yourself that it takes at least two to make a quarrel when you talk about me being "goaded").

But I really don't understand how anyone could seriously object to their being deleted once things reach the point where the entire front page of a Cracky board consists of nothing else.

The idea that there were things in them "that I don't care to have repeated" is one of the most laughable things I've read in my life, given that just about everybody in the Cracky community knows already that I have a low opinion of you and hates me for it.

I deleted the threads because they were pointless boring crap we've seen a thousand times before that had no relevance to the board.

If the "newfags" at Crackyhouse feel that I acted selfishly, arrogantly or unfairly, the way to prove that is to post something OTHER than infantile irrelevant flaming that I would have no reason or right to delete.

Looking at Crackyhouse in the three or four hours since the deletion I see that - despite said fags having mustered the energy to make several posts here - their total contribution to CH consists of two posts, that read:

Alex is a faggot pedophile

and

Alex please stop being a faggot pedophile.

I rest my case.