>>69
(a) There is no "Sky Queen"

(b) If you're referring to the daughter of upper-middle-class, Oxford-educated parents whom you guys harassed and slavered over seven years ago when she was practically a child, she certainly has, at age twenty-two, no interest in the existence of this board or in anything posted on it. In the unlikely eventuality of her ever taking a look at it, though, I'm pretty sure - given her background - that she'd find more amusement in a well-written post analyzing the psychology of vain little Internet bullies than in all your mixture of pubescent macro-baiting and pseudo-religious posturing put together.