>>75
Actually, why DON'T you people think about the implications of that fact? I mean the fact that Crackyhouse has finally pretty much upped and died - and it's not me that has made just this comment on and about CH over the past few days - just at the point where I gave up and STOPPED posting on it and generally trying to do something to make it less infantile and destructive.

As to your challenge to "post some links to posts of mine that people thought were funny", well, as we all know, one must be crazy to "try to prove anything on the Internet". No one has a memory that lasts more than thirty minutes, and even if they did and their memory told them they'd been proven wrong, they still wouldn't admit it, because why would they have to? It's the Internetz.

I seldom posted on here until recently, but I posted on CH for three years and, yes, there were a hundred instances when people expressed enjoyment of the humour and inventiveness of my posts. Several people have thanked me for them anonymously on the board and several more by name in private communications.

But I'm not going to bother to try to "document" all this because if you don't know it already, or are intent on pretending you don't know it, then your response can be predicted in advance: just more abuse and lies, claiming I'm same-fagging or whatever blah blah blah.

You can't argue ignorant people into recognizing knowledge or argue humourless people into recognizing humour.

You either see it or you don't.

You don't, and never will.