funny thing is in all the fantasy scenarios i've imagined, a lot of them involve putting her on a public platform like that as a means of reaching her, although i'd never use a picture of her as it would be too cruel i think. i'd always thought of using images associated with cracky, the make-up in particular, which even in a vague silhouette kind of form will remind anyone who knows cracky of her. the only references i'd make would be vague, and i'd only name her as the Sky Queen.

but then again the difference between you and i op is that you would intend to force her into a legal battle with you, whereas at most i would hope to have a small friendly discourse with her

>>1
>>2

I don't think either of those would cause her to 'come out in public'

Well you know the kind of sad thing with regard to using a subtle reference to Cracky- or even a blatant one like her photograph- is that maybe 11 people in the world would know who she was.

She disappeared before /b/ got any kind of notice by the internets and then of course by the mainstream media with pranks against Oprah, Faux News, and CNN.

Look at Boxxy's current youtube views. A band with Boxxy's unauthorized photo on the CD would cause a big stink. She didn't disappear, she cashed in on Cam Whoredom.

Cracky was never a camwhore to begin with, despite what many detractors said, and would still say if they remembered her.

She is almost forgotten.

I think that's why this board here feels so intense- it's like the posters are guarding a flame, very much in a primitive or religious sense.

I love Cracky and this board is important to me for more than "internets history" reasons.

>>4
11 people would recognize it. That's ten more than I'm hoping for. Dicks everywhere.

>>5 That's right I completely missed the logic of your plan. The band getting big doesn't depend on Cracky. In that case, I agree that a subtle clue might be most effective. I also don't think it would lead Cracky to contact the band, but I think it would make her feel good. People like getting recognition from someone famous, they don't necessarily like getting recognition from people posting photographs of her house online.

Hmmm

Now that I actually understand the plan, Step Two might be an obstacle:

Step One: form band in somebody's basement
Step Two: ?
Step Three: Release record with Cracky image
Step Four: Profit

retards are retarded

the obvious strategy is to mass murder some mofuggas while wearing cracky makeup and a crackyhouse t-shirt while jeffs tunes are blasting on your ipod.

that shit will get you attention.

>>8 don't forget to yell "CRACKY IS LIFE" or something equally dumb the entire time.

Oddly enuff, I am in a band, we have supported the likes of UK Subs, Vibrators, Anti-Nowhere League, etc, so we have achieved a certain amount of notoriety in our hometown, at least. Anyways, I have installed a Cracky mascot in my studio, and as a consequence of this, and indoctrinating my fellow bandmates who Cracky is (the queen of everything, d'uh!), I got asked last week to compose a song about her, so we will attempt it when the rest of the band return from Rebellion.
I hope Cracky likes old-skool punk. She can sue me if she likes, what is a 99% share of nothing, anyhow?

>UK Subs, Vibrators, Anti-Nowhere League, etc

who?

>>11

Stick with your Green Day and Avril Lavigne, sonny, if you don't know who they are.

>>10
SUPPORTED the UK SUBS?!!!?

Jesus...Given Cracky's family background in those exalted regions of the natural sciences that blend imperceptibly over into metaphysics, that's an idea that's mind-bending enough in itself to maybe draw her out of hiding - like someone's coming up with a blueprint for a refrigerating device for use at room temperatures of absolute zero.

The UK Subs were a support band to third-and fourth-class support bands already back in 1977. They were bottom of the bill at the Roxy Club on nights when the headliners were Eater, The Prefects, or Sham 69 (before the couple of British Top Ten hits scored by the last of these bands as punk went into terminal decline).

The idea of anyone's "supporting" THEM, even back then, when they were probably only in their mid- to late 30s, would have brought a Marquee-full of pogo-ing Mohicans to awed and tremulous silence on the brink of a metaphysical abyss.

How toweringly, irredeemably bad a band would have to be, then, in order to function as support to that tedious, lifeless, mechanical caricature of a punk group FORTY YEARS ON is something literally UNTHINKABLE - and therefore, as I say, an enticement in itself to the girl of inherited philosophical inclinations that we must assume Cracky to be.

LET'S ALL NOT SUCK EACH OTHERS DICKS JUST YET.

Until you get cracky out in the open, he's just another douchebag like everyone else here.

>>14
Actually, my point was that he's a douchebag already BEFORE you get Cracky out into the open.

>>14

lol

THE UNSPEAKABLE IN PURSUIT OF THE UNEATABLE

would clearly be a good name for the "flush out Cracky Band"

>>8 lol'd for truth.

You are evil. You won't lure out cracky with this. It won't work.

>>8
Always a distinct possibility I will do exactly this if I decide to go off my meds again

>>20
>>8

Nope won't work. It won't work without at least a 1000 page manifesto with 60% pasta and 40% fresh ramblings

>>13
I dont care about punk music, and even less about punk music critics opinions, not to mention their theories on genetically acquired philosophical baggage

just fuck off

>>22

No you fuck off

>>23
You dirty sod. You dirty old man.

>>24
Keep going. You've got another five minutes. Say something outrageous.

>>23

>>25
You dirty bastard.

>>27
Go on. Again.

>>28
Go on. Again.

>>29
You dirty fucker.

>>30
What a clever boy.

>>32
What a fucking rotter.

This reminds me - Chloe and Boxxy have had mockups of the Jamie Reid 'God Save the Queen' image made by fans, can some bright spark make one up for Cracky?

captcha = fawck

>>33
And yet another piece of sophisticated Dadaist humour founders and sinks on the reef of .71 users' egregious lack of knowledge of the history even of the POPULAR culture of the last fifty years...

>>35
Uh oh. Spoke too soon.
BRAVO THAT FAG.

>>35

>>37
Transcribing that from YouTube, by the way, I couldn't help taking a glance at some of the randomly half-related clips around it, such as this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCgbRS2LrHY&feature=fvwrel

and being reminded that the hypnotic fascination of total personal integrity tends to stay no jot less effective even when one is a LONG way from being nineteen any longer.

Maybe there's hope for Cracky yet.

Behold the proto-Cracky.

>>37....

>>38

>some of the randomly half-related clips around it

None of which are remotely related to Cracky except by the very indirect roundabout way that this thread is being derailed, by the unrelated, unsolicitated and unconstructive opinions on punk music from >>13

I'd rather hear any song from >>10 than any of your sterile disdain of the bands he has associated with in the past, I hope you are not wondering why.

>>41
Yeah, you're right, of course.

CH is a dead and rotting corpse (maybe something for you to think about, by the way, given that that's happened just when I CEASED to have any connection with the place and after people had been hammering on for months and years about "how much we'd have to say about Cracky if only this guy would stop derailing threads with his unsolicitated (yeah, they couldn't write English there either) opinions") so I occasionally feel tempted to share a good-natured joke with you guys (a good proportion of whom have probably fled here from CH anyway.

But I can see what that will inevitably lead to. The 1001st tedious "that fucking Alex Reynolds" thread, which always ends up in the unanswerable argument of the "performative self-contradiction": "If you think we're such a vicious, petty-minded, vindictive bunch of hate-filled mediocrities, why do you bother trying to relate to us in any way at all, be it friendly OR unfriendly?"

An unanswerable argument, as I say, once the dynamic of "you hate us, don't you? we hate you too blah blah" has been set in motion. So let's just leave it at that. You're a vicious, petty-minded, vindictive bunch of hate-filled mediocrities, and it would be inconsistent and self-degrading for me to relate to you in any way at all, be it friendly or unfrendly.

You win.

Satisfied?

>>10

Is your band called the Dirty rotten Scoundrels by any chance?

>>43

Nope. All will be revealed when there's a song written for Cracky (which may not even be a punk song), until then I will remain anonymous and take the buffets, blows and banter as they come.

And fuck that Alex Reynolds... big time. Charlie Harper (UK Subs) may be old, as you rightly point out, but he has a beautiful Japanese wife half his age, a decent catalogue of CDs under his belt, and legions of fans - what do you have, Alex? Apart from regrets?

The guy's worse than herpes :(

>>42
It's not a question of being satisfied, quite the contrary.

Everytime you come back, you pollute my world. Your departure is a relief, and your return is the return of an affliction.

There is no satisfaction in going back to an unafflicted state, especially when you keep coming back...

>>46
"Everytime you come back, you pollute my world. Your departure is a relief, and your return is the return of an affliction."

That's what I said, herpes.

>>42

Oh deary me, can't all of you just share your AIMs and argue over that instead of .71?
My biggest fear is that you'll all desert .71 like you did CH and argue at angels instead.
I for one would like less back-and-forth and more of dedicated discussion on her.

>>12

Avril Lavigne is a babe, fuckin' tool. Enjoy your skinhead/suspenders/garage party OI OI riotfests over football and a bit of larger. (faggot nigger activities)

Also, green day are not terrible so fuck right off.

Pic related, it's what I'll be doing to cracky while we laugh at your shitty music.

>>49

You both like shit music, fuck off and die.

Ver = pile, the pile of dog eggs you listen to.

>>50

great fucking story broski

>>50

ver = dog shit nigger post