>>41
Yeah, you're right, of course.
CH is a dead and rotting corpse (maybe something for you to think about, by the way, given that that's happened just when I CEASED to have any connection with the place and after people had been hammering on for months and years about "how much we'd have to say about Cracky if only this guy would stop derailing threads with his unsolicitated (yeah, they couldn't write English there either) opinions") so I occasionally feel tempted to share a good-natured joke with you guys (a good proportion of whom have probably fled here from CH anyway.
But I can see what that will inevitably lead to. The 1001st tedious "that fucking Alex Reynolds" thread, which always ends up in the unanswerable argument of the "performative self-contradiction": "If you think we're such a vicious, petty-minded, vindictive bunch of hate-filled mediocrities, why do you bother trying to relate to us in any way at all, be it friendly OR unfriendly?"
An unanswerable argument, as I say, once the dynamic of "you hate us, don't you? we hate you too blah blah" has been set in motion. So let's just leave it at that. You're a vicious, petty-minded, vindictive bunch of hate-filled mediocrities, and it would be inconsistent and self-degrading for me to relate to you in any way at all, be it friendly or unfrendly.
You win.
Satisfied?