The collage is way older, newfag.

It also used to be of much higher resolution and contained the full pics, not only the thumbnails.

>>2

Thanks, your info is helping me make some kind of timeline of events. It's confusing to me because as you point out "posts" could be "reposts" and of course anything at all could be copypasta for all I know, including this thing I'm writing right now.

>>3
As everyone is aware, I don't really give a shit about all this Cracky stuff, but Pinky "Newfag and Proud of It" Rose here really is a fascinating little case study in the tricks that vanity and arrogance play on one's own mind, and at least attempt to play on the minds of others.

The patterns of his interventions here appears to be fairly well defined and established now. First he makes some ridiculous overblown claim based on entirely insufficient knowledge, as in the first post on this thread. Then, when he's shot down in flames, he falls back on the forelock-tugging, Uriah-Heep-ish, "Oh massa I am but a newfag" persona.
Wouldn't it be considerably more honest and considerably less wasteful of your energy to not make know-it-all claims in the first place, i.e. to "lurk moar" before you elect yourself archivist of .71?

It might also be a good idea, by the way, to read through your posts before you post them to check that they don't contain anything that isn't just factually incorrect but literally senseless - as is, for example, your forelock-tugging avowal that "anything at all could be copypasta for all I know, including this thing I'm writing now." The idea of "copypasta that you write without being aware it's copypasta" is, I believe, what's called an oxymoron, or "contradictio in adjecto". By definition, "copypasta" is something you COPY, and unless you suffer from an extreme form of schizophrenia it's hardly possible to copy something down without knowing you're doing it. Something you've written turning out, by chance, to BE an exact word-for-word copy of what someone else has written would still not be "copypasta". It would just be an amazing coincidence, or a lie.
My goodness, my goodness. The nigh-unnavigable labyrinths of human vanity. And that in someone who so profusely oozes humility and love for his "brothers".

>>Alex

It was meant as a joke- my own post as copypasta. I don't claim it was a funny joke, but how could you think I literally meant that?

I'm not trying to be the site archivist. I'm making my own archive. I do lurk all over, but I got more good tips and useful leads here in the last two weeks than I did in a year on my own.

Not that it's any of your business. It isn't, of course.

Even you are unwittingly helping, since your name and story keeps coming up on this board, other boards, and many archived threads. Your story is pretty embarrassing, so maybe no wonder you seem so embittered.

You seem to be experiencing rather sudden mood swings, from "God Bless" last night as if you were going to bed, then spitting a last bit of "good night" poison not twenty minutes later. You pled for understanding for your bilious mood last night by explaining that Rav Rav is bleeding you dry and the German police are after you. Why should I or anyone else make allowances for your mood caused by your own poor choices? Who is forcing you to pay a cam whore exorbitant sums to jerk off over her? Also, speaking of taking things literally that were obviously meant as jokes, how is it that you have an internet connection inside of your steamer trunk?

Still, I'm mystified why you give a shit what I post in the first place.

just fuck off troll

>>5
Well, it's true that I'm bored and nervous and so on and, yes, I don't really have a moral leg to stand on when it comes to posting here, as I have at no point in the past three and more years been able to even approximately grasp the charm or interest of this girl Cracky.

But the complex feints and double-feints of human vanity - which the "feinter" and "double-feinter" is often himself not even aware of - DO have a strange morbid fascination for me and - assuming I'm addressing now the person that I THINK I'm addressing - you do strike me as a prime example of a very vain and arrogant individual who parades around - perhaps, as I say, without even being aware of it - under the "sheep's clothing" of gratitude and humility.

The post I responded with "God bless you" to was NOT a post by the "New-Fag-and-Proud-of-It" character I believe myself to be addressing now, since that post referred to that character in the third person. The post in question DIDN'T strike me as vain or silly, but rather as fairly intelligent and sort of honest and well-meaning, despite the inclusion of some insults aimed in my direction.

Your posts, though - again assuming I've got the right "you" here - DO strike me as consistently hypocritical, consistently expressive of a persona that claims to be one thing - humble and "loving" - but is in fact another: arrogant and vain and impatient to be a "big shot".

THAT's my objection to your and to most posts that I object to: VANITY, not dumbness.

As to the whole question of dragging RavRav into this: Well, it's further proof of your arrogant, vain, impatient tendency to want to talk about things you possess at best a very, very superficial knowledge of.

I'm sure everbody here will loudly proclaim how much of a shit they don't give about this, but there is actually nothing in the least bit "shameful" or "embarassing" about my....well, I won't waste space searching for a word for it....for RavRav. Sure, she's a whore and I'm a john. But she's a lot more than a whore too, and I'm a lot more than a john. It's a dirty, nasty old world that we live in, but I'm not without hope that there'll be a sort of "happy ending" one day - though one unlikely to involve the standard key "happy ending" ingredient of sex.

>>7
I'd take this particular insult out of the repertoire if I were you.
I don't need to sock-puppet.
I'm perfectly capable of provoking people to lengthy tirades against me without having to make them up, thank you very much.

>>8
It wasnt an insult, I was stating a fact: you're a jerk, and I'll discuss cinema with anybody else but you.

>>10
But ultimately, yes, I do believe that you are sock pupetting, Alex, if that is indeed your name...

So fuck off troll is more than you deserve.