>>6
Let's not let the details of the stories I relate on here - like the "500 dollars PCM" business - become TOO solid a part of what "everyone knows" about RavRav. I may not be the "troll" I'm accused of being, but a lot of what I say should be taken with a pinch of salt.
As to her "vanilla" quality....well, for a long time I was convinced that her sexuality, far from being "vanilla", was of a flavour far beyond the wildest dreams of Ben and Jerry. Now I'm not so sure. Some days I suspect there's nothing in the way of sexual ice-cream inside that svelte and vampish cone at all - which is a suspicion which I've come to harbour, actually, over the years about a large number of apparently intensely sexualized women.
Rather than just chucking abuse at her, though, I think you'd do better to enter into the implications of the Blake poem I quoted, since, precisely due to her relative "vulgarity", RavRav can indeed stand as that opposite principle of bland Californian "sun-rays" that Blake opposes to the "winter and darkness" of Cracky's England. After all, if you're laying claim, as you are, to some sort of power of subtle discrimination as regards female beauty, you ought to be able to appreciate the "dialectics" of the question, no?