>>13
That's absolute nonsense.

This "RavRav thread", for example, was obviously started as an attempt to mock and bait me as a pathetic old man who has to pay for sex that isn't even real sex.

My response was to introduce into the "discussion" two points of literary reference, one of which at least - as this board is often brimming over with William Blake - was an opportunity for a highly Cracky-relevant discussion that could have been conducted civilly and constructively.

Unfortunately, this particular Blake poem - one of his most heart-rending and profoundly true - doesn't appear to be part of the two or three well-known verses that the "Gospel-mongers" have fetishized.

So the responses so far have amounted to little more than "fuck fuck fuck you potery fuck you shit".

As one poster has pointed out, this is not currently a very bitter or angry Alex. But it might as well be, for all the difference it wll make.