None may strike a single chord or note save they salute Cracky, or have a toast to her. (As I am the one who pushes the buttons and understands how it all works... do they have a choice?)

>>2

>giant and somewhat exposed tits
>nearing long hair

explain this bullshit

>>4

She was in the studio. Had to have been drunk ('nuff said, already).

>>4

tru dat, this is some silicon american porn star not our petite sweet Crackles...

You guys have a point. But this is their first step (I speak of my fellow troubadors) into recognizing the Three Stigmata of Cracky-Chan so I have done my work. May her memetic goodness infect us all. Amen.

>>7 Nice pic.

>>8
Thank you, I painted it during my agoraphobic phase. It was also when I wrote the majority of the Sky Queen related stuff. It was a strange time, when the world seemed filled with wonder and change, yet I could barely make myself leave home to procure the basic necessities. Olivia...no Cracky was the only thing that helped me maintain my tenuous grip on reality.

Funny isn't it? Only after I had put all this behind me for the sake of a girl, did I finally lose cabin pressure so to speak. If I had never been introduced to Becca, I never would have give all of you up, and I never would have lost my mind. She is a sick mind and rots everything around her.

Gackto AKA Jeff The Chef - "Let's Just Go"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGXd17s61KM

Tried a different kind of rhyme scheme.

This song is about a guy and a girl who each have had a rough life finding each other and getting away. They're escaping reality and running away to see the world.

MP3:
http://sharebee.com/38ac2590

Available in stores now.

>>9
How the light of Her Truth emanates blindingly from every word you write, oh brother anonymonk, oh fellow selfless and egoless component of the great Group Mind.

Let me meld my abnegating non-identity with yours to an even greater degree than it's melded already, my selfless and egoless brother, by saying that I too, by the grace of the Sky Queen yea by Her Grace Alone, have experienced just such terrible and mysterious ironies in my life.

How strange and terrible an irony it is, for example, that someone like me - someone who is so uniquely and exceptionally interesting and so edge-y and fascinatng and yeah, even slightly CRAZY (in a really fascinating and cool and exciting way) and generally amazingly cool and wonderful and stuff, and who is also the author of the fantastically amazingly important and unique and special and cool writings that everybody in the Crackyverse reads and cherishes and looks on with awestruck wonder and admiration - because I AM the author of those writings, by the way; I mention it just in passing because it's something that's easily overlooked what with me being, by the Grace of the Sky Queen Yea By Her Grace Alone, so selfless and egoless and so utterly devoid of personal vanity and all - HOW STRANGE AND TERRIBLE AN IRONY IT IS, I say, that I should have become, By the Mercy of the Sky Queen All Hail Her Glory, so completely selfless and egoless and anonymously immersed in the selfless and egoless Great Group Mind as to feel no impulse at all, on any occasion, to draw attention to myself or my accomplishments or the details of my life, like one or two namefags and wordfags I could mention, boundless be the distance that they are cast and forever banished from the presence of the Sky Queen, vain, self-obsessed egomaniacs that they are.

And the nice friendly good natured gentleman is back to start some constructive, civil interaction with a bunch of spoilt two-year-olds banging their spoons on their high-chair, not even aware the value of the wisdom this benevolent fixer of websites is bestowing on them, again...

Well I wouldnt want to make a liar out of such an honest man, so here it is: fuck off, troll.

>>12
that, or penis boy is having a schizoid episode

>>14
Hmmm...What could THIS possibly mean?

"Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, and seekst not the beam in thine own?"?

"In the kingdom of the blind the one-eyed man is king - particularly when he's some kind of androgyne who could be perceived as an attractive masculine-ish girl, if you're into that sort of thing, and is also double-jointed"?

"Look, the person in this photo is able to take weird shots of themselves that make you think 'Hmmm, how did they get their arm into that position?' because they have a friend to help them out, unlike Alex Reynolds"?

Where are the tears of yesterday evening?
Where are the snows of yesteryear?

So here I am wondering about her. I don't really know if thats normal. Look for a clue you'll get who. She seems so petty some times but she can be really funny too. She reminds me of some one I used to know a long time ago. Its painful when I think about it. Like a knife just jamming in the back of my head.

>>9

>She is a sick mind and rots everything around her.

Wait, what, Becca is Alex?

>>11
There is more than one anonymonk, certainly the one that compilled the Patmos Gospel is another one, for example.

But as far as Crackyverse history goes, you can hardly say that Becca's ex-boyfriend was ever the selfless anonymous one...

The reason for it is also why this admission is relevant, since Suede ran wish, where the tripfags migrated after the nukes, and pulled the plug when he got together with Becca.

As the early Sky Queen "dogmatist" who then more or less left it to others to make the little but steady development that led us to what the cult of the Skyqueen is today, this all has more relevance and deserve more respect from a fellow anonymonk than any of the shit you've thrown at everyone here.

Turns out what you thought was hypocrisy was in fact ignorance, yours actually. Of unimportant facts, but of facts relevant to this post, this thread and this board.

Way to fly off the handle again, jerk.

>>15

Oh, so that's what "the Snowdens of yesteryear" in Catch-22 was an allusion to. You learn something new every day.

>>11
I want her to notice me. I want her attention, I want her for myself. I want to eat her out when she is on the rag.

vericode: sap

>>20
Well, speaking purely personally, the first three aspirations plunge far too deeply into the sphere of unequivocal batshit craziness for me to be able to say anything empathic, or indeed anything at all, about them.

You're talking about a 15-year-old girl who has long since ceased to exist as such, and who surely never knew anything about you - that might have helped her decide whether she wanted to give you her "attention" in any shape or form - in the first place.

Adoration of "the other" - when it is indulged in under such utterly unpromising objective conditions - is, I would submit, tantamount in essence to adoration of one's own self.

(You know, the whole Angelus Silesius way of relating to one's God, which most of you will doubtless have encountered, if at all, in the psycho-nutso version of it offered by De Niro and Scorsese in their remake of "Cape Fear" (no "Taxi Driver", but an amusing movie nonetheless): "I am the Lord and the Lord is me; I am as large as God, He is as small as I; He cannot above me, nor I beneath Him be.")

I think it's healthy, though, that you include the frankly masochistic fourth aspiration in the list of things that prompt you to be a Crackyfag. This, of course, I can relate to, and I really don't think that the sexually masochistic element in the whole Cracky cult - fantasies about being made to eat her shit and menstrual blood, about being fucked in the ass by her etc. - are really given their due by the "community".
Although I personally don't find her very physically appealing, she certainly was an ideal object for submissive-masochistic sexual fantasies in several respects, being

(a) purely "virtual" (or almost purely so) and thereby an object of perpetual intense desire unadulterated by any likely satiation,

(b) underage; even if one happens actually not to be pedophilic, the slightly underage girl is endowed with an immense masochistic appeal, since she possesses, without having to take any sort of action and merely by virtue of her being the age she is, a potential power to devastate a man's social and civil existence which an older female will only possess if she decides to actively bring a rape charge against one or something.

and

(c) Jewish; too wide and complex a topic really to address here, but there does appear to be some weird deep elective affinity between the Judaic and the masochistic spheres of experience. Sacher-Masoch wasn't himself Jewish, but he lived among them in fin-de-siecle Poland and was obsessively fascinated by them and the quintessentially Central-European-Jewish worlds of Kafka and Bruno Schulz are shot through with compelling images of seductive-destructive women.

And as a word to the "Gospel-mongers": none of this "heresy" need actually necessarily be considered blasphemy against the Sky Queen, her chastity, transcendence etc. - or at least not as any blasphemy that was not already being committed with impunity against the Virgin Mary already in the 13th Century. (See the Seminar given circa 1960 by the Crackyverse's "house philosopher", Jacques Lacan, on "The Ethics of Psychoanalysis", with its long disquisition on masochism, Catholicism and Amour Courtois).

>>21
I am Jewish if that adage "your mother is a Jew, you're a Jew" is to be held true. And besides your opinion is null since Raging Bull is the superior De Niro/Scorsese. Of course Scorsese's performance as Van Gogh, in Kurosawa's Dreams would make a fantastic contributor to this community, While De Niro's role in Analyze This is more akin to your particular brand of proxy masculinity by way of intellectual stalemate. You front tough, but your are blubbering middle aged failure hiding in your cultural daddy's big shoes. Now run along and play with the other kiddies.

TARPOOF

>>20
Well, you got HIS attention.

Good job. Now stop engaging the troll directly so this lying jerk makes good on his promise to leave us in peace.

>>22
Oi veh.
Not really following you here, as I can't see how you get an objective ranking of Scorsese's movies from my post in the first place (I only said in passing that I thought "Taxi Driver" was better than "Cape Fear", not a controversial opinion), nor how that would have any effect on the essential points I raise even if it were there.

I suppose I should have kept my mouth shut. This post wasn't an attack on anyone, but the point that someone keeps making holds true, I suppose: ANY Alex post about ANYTHING = flame war.

>>24
And as we're speaking of "lies", it seems to me I notice in this post of yours the same rather distasteful hypocritical rhetorical structure as I noted in another post some time ago (maybe yours too).

It's absolutely imperative, of course, that .71 show a "united front" and that nobody be seen to dislike or disagree with anyone ELSE apart from Alex Reynolds (after all, it's only 25 against 1 at the moment, and you wouldn't want these just-about-safe odds to shift against you).

So you begin your address to this poster with a compliment - "good job" - giving every impression, initially, that you approve of his post (which, yes, was indeed a reply to a post of mine).

Only in the third line does the actual intent and gist of your own intervention become clear, namely: "You musn't speak to this guy. You fucked up by even addressing him and if you do it again YOU won't be welcome in this den of totalitarian, compulsorily unanimous bullies either."

If you're going to accuse people of being "liars", please try to do some work on your own honesty and, if you're going to bully people and tell them what they can and cannot write, dispense with the pseudo-back-slapping.

>>26
See the troll now try to engage me directly...

Allright here is a bone:

The lie I was referring to was of course that you meant you would leave us in peace, if we were being fair, two or three times ago when you had last made a similar promise or statement to the effect that you would leave this place you know you dont belong in and where you cant avoid being a disruptive poster whatever your intentions, or something like that, who knows, my exasperation is not letting me remember it all, not that I would really like to.

tl;dr you are a troll, it's best not to engage trolls directly, to avoid feeding them and thus insuring their return.

>>27
Yes, I know the "lie" that YOU were referring to - although the reason that I keep "making myself a liar" is that hope springs eternal in the human breast that you may not ALL be total cunts and that one or two of you may be able to respond intelligently to friendly and relevant posts like my last one.

The "lie" that I MYSELF was referring to was YOUR "lie" in beginning with the words "good job" a post the gist of which was actually "BAD job; you shouldn't talk to this guy; you fucked up"

OK?

I remember a tripfag long ago, he was always the nice guy

no malice, a bit aloof, you could amost pity him without feeling guilty about it

and then I saw a post, with his trip, but it sounded like another known tripfag that was involved in that particular drama thread, spewing strife as that one had alway been

the post stayed a few hours and then was deleted

I'll never trust a single of you fuckers but come on, wind me up some more

>>28
I obviously didnt mean that he did a good job, but I was stating the common sense knowledge that talking directly to trolls tends makes them coming back again and again, as you keep doing "in spite of yourself".

OK?

>>29
Oh look, forget it, you're just a bunch of sad little people unable to see beyond the horizon of your sad little world.
I don't even know what a "tripfag" is, so I have no idea what "you fuckers" is supposed to mean.
I'm just someone who writes his opinions frankly and openly on internet boards. I don't seek to advertise my name and identity, but there wouldn't be much point in my seeking to hide them either, as I got drawn into this a few years ago by Jeff's publishing thirty or forty e-mails of mine on Crackyhouse, all signed with my real name.
I don't belong to your silly clique-y little world of "this-type-fag" and "that-type-fag" etc. etc. - but, yeah, this all seems pretty pointless because you people obviously can't operate outside the narrow horizons of that world, so there's no communicating with you.

>>31
I dont think I wasnt talking to you

but I've been wrong before

>>32
The last 15 posts on this thread have all, without exception, been referring to me and my posts.

Your post contains no indication that you intended it to refer back to posts made days ago well back up the thread.

Possibly, you ARE such an arrogant contemptuous snob that you're literally blind to things you don't want to take cognizance of, and assume others will be too.

But if that is the case you can hardly expect other people to carry on rational acts of communication with you, or complain that people "didn't realize who you were talking to".

You people clearly truly are mentally ill, and I really MUST get it through my head that IT IS UTTERLY POINTLESS TALKING TO YOU.

>>31
If I really wanted a wide horizon world, I'd go to another website, and I often do, in fact, Same if I wanted to explore sexuality or look for porn, actually.

No, I come here for the Cult of the Sky Queen. Yeah, it's pretty narrow, but I love it and I somehow dont feel like I'm swimming against the current.

You refuse to fit within the boundaries of this world, calling those boundaries ridiculous.

Find your own world then. It should be that simple, but no, you keep coming back to tell us how ridiculous those boundaries are, over and over.

I dont think it's about the boundaries anymore. I say it's spiteful disruptive behavior for the sake of it, because at this point everybody knows nobody wants to know what elements of the whole Cracky cult you think is not really given their due by the "community".

I say you are here precisely because you know your presence is going to be disruptive, and that it is precisely what you love.

But go ahead, invalidate my opinion. Leave.

>>33
come on, I'm a monkey
whadya expect from me

but no, whoever I was talkin to would know I was and why, and this is the right place

no need for an answer either, quit freaking out you schizoid half person you, you...

...double nigger

Alright this is all getting too damned confusing. Other then Alex's obvious tl;dr posts and my own, I am at a loss as to whom is whom.
ftr I am
>>9
>>20
>>22

Vericode: rugeness as in ego comparable to the largest island in Germany

>>37
well, you would too, of course

it's the problem with all those entities bumping in the wired and so on, and so forth

alright
ftr I am a monkey
and I posted
>>13
>>29
>>32
>>35
>>36

shockin, isnt it

but then my name is shock

>>38
crap, dint post my pic
now you'll really be confused...

>>37

>do you know schwill is penis?

Wait, what, schwill is suede?

>>40
Schwill = Suede = Craig

like I said, not a single one of you fuckers

>>41
I sincerely did not know that, but then again, like the monkey said, you cant really trust anyone or really believe anything said in here...

I'm just kidding guys, those are three entirely different people.

like I said, not a single one of you fuckers

Hurr

Protip: ITT