>>48
Well, the people I call "vicious cunts" ARE generally vicious cunts, sorry.

I don't go around callng someone a "vicious cunt" who's done nothing but vandalized a Botticelli or confused "literally" with "metaphorically". I call them "a vandal" or "not very well educated", as is appropriate.

But I think it's likewise only appropriate to actually use the term "vicious cunt" to describe a guy who makes a post on the Internet about someone's sexual relations with a girl and knowingly states her to be seven years younger than she is so as to gain the unfair advantage of presenting someone he hates as a pedophile.

The problem here is that - all the blather about "the non-self of Anonymous" notwithstanding - the Crackyverse is full of people who are staggeringly vain and self-regarding and become as deeply, bitterly and furiously wounded and angry at being called "tasteless" or "insufficiently educated" as they would - justifiably - at being called a malevolent lying cunt.