>>59
>But my remarks on the painting business and the gospel business could have been the beginning of a robust, yes, but still respectful discussion about such things, if anybody had cared to mount a reasoned defence of what you're doing.
If by robust you meant dismissive and by respectfull you meant derogatory, then yes, how obtuse of us to not want to engage with someone who has already his mind made up that we are islamofascist dogs who want to deface all that he hold dear, such as Botticelli and the King James Bible...
I mean, come on, the first word was "clumsily". Not only were we defacing the artistic patrimony of the ages but we were doing it clumsily. Not only were we idiots, but risible ones, and pompous too. If that is what you call well-meaning and constructive criticism, no wonder you cant talk religion with Muslims, or Crackyfags for that matter...
No good was going to come of it, and you knew it. There is no good that will ever come of you posting here, unless your amusement at the expense of others can be considered good. I somehow doubt that a couple of thousand years worth of human culture have shown the rest of humanity that it has.