>>9
Well, "repetitive and unimaginative" is relative, isn't it, just like anything else.

It's true that my posts here tend to be variations on the same theme of deep contempt and disgust for you people's stupidity and hypocrisy - so, no, they're not the works of Shakespeare, which effortlessly embrace all forms and varieties of human life and emotion.

But then they're not

elephants one hundred each field a red nose
and since that only one only imperfection can goes
elephants one hundred each field a red nose
and since that only one only imperfection can goes
elephants one hundred each field a red nose
and since that only one only imperfection can goes
elephants one hundred each field a red nose
and since that only one only imperfection can goes
elephants one hundred each field a red nose
and since that only one only imperfection can goes

either, are they?

So they clearly have a fuck of a way to go before even being in the running for the .71 prize for Dull Unimaginative Repetition.