>>1

But what are you in love with? A picture.

'A picture'? Cracky is an ideal. And as such, she is eternal. Cracky shall endure even when the light from the stars has come to the end of its' journey, and has nowhere else to go, save back to her. All things return to Cracky, eventually.

>>3

Don't kid yourself. It's all about pictures.

>>2
Hi Olivia. I love you.

Its not even an ideal, its a Goddess which used some girl called Olivia as an avatar. A few fail to see this. Including clueless Olivia herself.

>>5 That's a clever post- it is copypasta from Olivia no?

"But what are you in love with? A picture."

If not copypasta, it's very close to something she did post in the past. I can't be arsed to go through all my "cracky post" folders at the moment. Also, it's possible that >>2 just said the same thing without knowing Cracky said it before.

Or it could be Olivia. I bet GOOGOL to one against it though.

At any rate, it is all about the pictures, at least to start. No point denying that. If Cracky's photos hadn't been so cute and sweet and let's face it sexy, the cult never would have got off the ground. I'm glad it did though. I'm in love with the image of Cracky.

>>7
Cracky believed her pictures were praised for their artistic merit. Although that could sometimes be quite impressive too, needless to say she is very wrong. It's all about her image and her fucking cuteness and sweetness.

>>5
>>7

>>No, sorry, you need to talk for your own experiences, you cant talk about mine or others like you actually know that they exactly are like yours. You dont, because they arent.

Crappy talentless self pictures of Oliva, as cute and sweet as she is, wouldnt have kept me here all those years.

Those pics arent snapshots of a model, they carry an artistic expression of something no one has quite figured out yet. That is what keeps me here.

So you are as wrong as you say Olivia is wrong, inasmuch as we're both here for different reasons, whereas you seem to think we're all here for the same reasons as you.

>>10 here again
was responding to >>8 obviously

>>10 Your point is well-taken, but I don't agree that Olivia's photos were "crappy" and "no talent."

Quite the contrary. One of the more unfortunate results of "The Stalking" was that we cheated ourselves out of seeing the development of her self-portraiture and her aesthetic over the course of years.

Even ED, which tries hard to be as soulless as /b/, said she had "an unusually rich aesthetics."

Olivia had, and presumably still has, the soul of an artist.

>>12
Dont get me wrong, I meant "even if they were" rather than that they are. In fact, my whole post wouldnt make any sense if I actually meant the pics were crappy and talentless.

You probably got mixed up by my first line appearing to be a quote but really, I think you reacted without reading the rest of the post, sorry to have to say...