Naw. I like his style better than yours so FOYCPW.

And furthermore, this post of yours reminds me of an exchange in Kurosawas' 'Seven Samurai' - some butthurt samurai, proven to be a coward and a failure to boot (sounds familiar already, eh?), takes a swipe at the poor blind monk playing the shamisen in the corner, asking him to shut up - but everyone else in the inn shouts: 'KEEP PLAYING, MONK! WE LIKE IT!'

Exit stage left.

Yeah, Alex, let's ban him so you and Mero can turn this place into a second CH...

Funny that you two would be of one mind, all of a sudden...

>>3
Well, it was just a well-meant contribution.

If "everyone" here likes it, then "everyone" likes it - although a more appropriate analogy than that of a monk (blind or otherwise) playing a musical instrument would surely have been a spoiled or mentally-defective three-year-old banging his spoon monotonously against the floor for hours and days on end.

No arguing at all, though, about the fact that it makes your board look as crappy as page after page of child porn would make it look.

Well, OK, to be fair and balanced, ALMOST as crappy.

Child porn IS significantly worse.

But I would hope that the choice between that and the idiot monomania of someone who hasn't been able to think of a single new thing to say in four or five years isn't the ONLY choice.

>No arguing at all, though, about the fact that it makes your board look as crappy as page after page of child porn would make it look.

And you'd be the one who knows all about that, in order to make such a comparison... right?

...and to think I was civil to you this morning... no more, no more...

FOYCPW

Alex, I was the one that brought to your attention the fact that Hauer improvised that line in Blade Runner on CH.

I am also the so called Robert-De-Niro-is-not-a-method-actor guy.

I would have eventually discussed stuff not strictly Cracky related with you, you know, if you had managed to stay civil for more than one day, and provided we would have done so on CH, but you know, Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky Cracky.

So, fuck right off.

>>7
Well, I really don't understand these posts by people who claim they "want to be civil to me" etc.

The condition you place on your "being civil" appears to be that I only ever make posts in which I BEAT UP ON MYSELF for the amusement and enlightenment of other people (as when I laugh at myself for being so wrong about Rutger Hauer).

No actual CRITICISM of ANYTHING that appears on this board appears to be acceptable - and will inevitably result in the in-unison fanboy poison-spitting that it has always resulted in.

But it's completely indisputable that the "Post-The-Same-Bit-of-Ancient-Crackypasta-Over-and-Over-Again-a-Hundred-Times" Guy IS making your board look like some kind of refugee camp for hopeless retards.

Every time he sees ANYTHING he doesn't like - regardless of whether it's child porn or a disquisition on modern cinematography - it's just the same tedious stupid "copy/paste/repeat" "copy/paste/repeat" until he's bumped and barged whatever he doesn't like off the front page.

I'm just pointing out that your debate about moderating is superfluous.

You already HAVE a "moderator".

He's self-appointed, has a mental age of three and the naturally fascist mentality that goes with that, and has probably never CREATED anything in his entire sad existence - just peevishly but indefatigably DESTROYED anything that dimly appears to him not to concord with the "four legs good, two legs bad" credo that is all that he has ever had the wit to commit to his chicken-sized memory and understanding.

>>8

Your whining about the monks' hebephrenic verses reminds me of the people who 'didn't get' stuff like:
The Dada Movement,
Andy Warhol,
Jamie Reids' artwork for the Sex Pistols,
The invention of the digital sampler,
Internet memes,
...and now, the monks' verse.

It is beautiful, and you are a philistine if you can't appreciate it. So kill yourself.

Pinky Newfag here, and no Alex The Monk's activity on rebumping to get porno and literal crap off the front page is only ever a reaction. There were weeks of peace here when the Monk helped me and other fags, with discussion and such. The Monk wasn't putting up more than one daily devotion post until true crapflooding started. If MA moderated the board I doubt the Monk would be guarding the front page like he has been recently. A read of all previous posts on the board shows he only increases such activity in response to a serious amount of CH-like activity. I was the person bumping all the time a month or so ago until I was told to stop flooding. So I did stop. But I still understand and appreciate the Monk and other devotees (he's not alone) making sure at least the first post at the top of the first page isn't a 13 year old raw gaping vagina smiling at me.

Vericode: fin

the end

>>9
Maybe we're talking at cross-purposes here.

I suppose YOU'RE talking about the thread currently directly below this one - that currently consists of 92 posts the degree of creativity and originality involved in which I cannot judge, as I'm not a great connoisseur of Crackypasta.

What I was talking about, though, was primarily three other pseudo-"threads" which currently take up about 50% of page 1 of the board and which do in fact consist of NOTHING ELSE AT ALL but one guy (presumably) just banging the copy and paste keys over and over again to assert his dominance over the board.

(Incidentally, I see that your beloved "Monk"'s thread likewise consists, for about 30% of its total bulk, of what is recognizable even to a non-Crackyfag like me as just years-old Crackypasta posted for the umpteenth time in unchanged form. I would guess that a Crackyfag might recognize 50%, 70%, maybe even 100% of it, as such).

As I say, I don't necessarily believe that "loyalty" and "guardianship" are negative qualities in themselves. But they only have sense and point when the "guard dogs" have SOMETHING THEY ARE ACTUALLY GUARDING. To use five-year-old Crackypasta to establish a perimeter within which there can be safely preserved....just more five-year-old Crackypasta seems entirely pointless to me.

>>8
First off, I made sure not to push your "disquisition on cinematogragpy" as I was pushing of the crap off page 0, you egomaniac jerk.

You may not have noticed, but in normal times, I.E. when our resident troll is not busy defacing page 0, There is only one or two threads of crackypasta on it, and not so much carpfolding. There was quite a bit of junk to push off, and yes, it is the only way we seem to have at present to get rid of the crap...

But no, this latest tantrum of yours is not about crackypasta, it's about not getting enough attention and pats on the back for being "jovial", and being bumped to the bottom of the page...

You are a petty self absorbed man with a bottomless well of resentment for any slight to your person, real or imagined. The viciousness of the last paragraph in >>8 stands testament to how stupidly you always jump to conclusions, and act out on it blindly, without fairness, without measure.

Then you wonder why people want nothing to do with you.

Fuck you.

oh look it's THIS thread again

hurp durp

>>11
Seriously Alex, if you find it pointless, just stop coming here...

Is it really that hard to figure that the only person that seem to agree with you on this is Mero?

Me, I find it interesting that you both are viciously attacking the same person on the same subject the same day...

>>14

We're secretly coordinating to bring the monastery down.

hurp durp

>>12
Honestly, I don't mind if my stuff is bumped off the front page, deleted, or ritually burnt while singing Cracky-hymns. I only write it as a way of increasing my productivity as a translator, and thereby my earnings, by giving me little refreshing breaks from the dire stuff I have to churn out 400 or 500 lines a day of.

But my point still stands that a page 1 full of the same post repeated 29 or 49 or 69 times looks ALMOST as bad as a page 1 full of CP.

However, if you are willing to admit that you do it NOT in any spirit of self-righteousness but just because the board is unmoderated and because even more offensive crap keeps turning up on page 1 and its the only way it can be removed...well, then I don't have such a problem with it, or you.

In an ideal world, CP and so on would be removed even without moderation, by a steady flow of new, creative discussion.
But this isnt an ideal world.

>>14
Well, I DO agree with Mero in NOT EVEN BEING ABLE TO IMAGINE HOW FUCKING NUTS ONE WOULD HAVE TO BE to believe that he and I are the same person.

We fucking hate each other for Christ's sake!

Although, come to think of it, he DID sort of back me up in the Tinychat the other night on those ridiculous lies that I've been spreading about Dolores wanting to do sex-stuff with me....

And Deutsche Telekom DID deny with remarkable insistence that my Berlin land-line had EVER received any call from the Australasian area...

And I HAVE been discovering scattered among my papers recently various wild, pseudo-autobiographical fantasies about "fucking bitches" that are alternately undersigned "Alex" and "Mero", sometimes even.....oh God help me! it is all coming together now!!..."Merolex" or "Alro"!!!!

>>16
You're the only one who ever saw self-righteousness in it.

Yes, I do make one Crackypasta post a day, as a prayer and an homage to the baleetion of Trolltalk, but no, my aim has never been to plaster page 0 with Crackypasta, you just made another one of your stupid assumptions, the ones that keep popping up and standing between any kind of meaningful discussion between you and me, time and time again.

And no, CP is not even remotely as crappy as Crackypasta, not for a Crackyfag anyway. I cant start to imagine how it could be even for people who dislike Crackypasta.

Seriously, It makes me wonder about your motivations.

>>15
>>17
nice knee jerk reaction

>>18
Well, my apologies to you, then.

I really don't find your stuff annoying, if you are the one who is simply lengthening the "Nobody ever stops loving Cracky" thread by a Burroughs-esque "cut-up"-style post a day.

As I say, what I've found fascistic and idiotic has just been this lazy spoon-banging of the repetition of the same post and image 40, 50, 60 times in multiple threads.

If CP and so on could be permanently bumped away by stuff as inherently interesting as your stuff, things wouldn't be so bad.

speaking of endless pointless repetition, Alex, every single time you come here you start a honking fight that ends in one of two ways

1. You apologize
2. You swear it's the last time you'll come

And yet you do the exact same thing the next time, with the chance of 1 or 2 being around 50/50.

More boring than disruptive.

...and I'd like to remind everyone that it ended up being very convenient for Mero, who just had admitted he is the shitposter

until I reminded you of course

hurp

>>9 here.

I'm the FOYCPW man.

Where reason fails, force prevails.

FOYCPW

>>20
Apology increasingly grudgingly accepted, as all the other apologies of yours I seem to have collected over the last couple of years. Let's not talk of the times you never apologized for...

Frankly, just like >>21 I'm getting tired of that repetitive meta-spoon banging of yours. A simple look at the second page would have told you why some admittedly repetitive posts were on the first.

Next time, ask questions BEFORE firing your AK.

>>22

nice dubs

think about it Alex, do you really want to be arguing the same shit the town drunk/village idiot is ranting about?

>>26

His points are salient as are mine. Allow me take a page from the Alex manifesto and declare a 1 month moratorium on all Meroposts. Let's see how much the board 'improves'. Protip for the dumbfuck newfriends - it was never good.

Gif related, as always.

Cya.

the spam is the reason this board is fucking terrible

>>27
look at this little drama queen

protip: mero has always worn his ass on his head so he could feel more interesting, probably a throwback to all the time he spent scrounging for the attention of his cold bitch of a mother

but you havent answered the monk's question: why are YOU still here?

oh, that's right, you're gone, again

additional protip: Alex is not the first to make public declarations about his departure filled with nasty parting shots, but it's the first time Mero actually says he is going to come back, in a month

a shitposting month, no doubt