>>7
Well, I really don't understand these posts by people who claim they "want to be civil to me" etc.
The condition you place on your "being civil" appears to be that I only ever make posts in which I BEAT UP ON MYSELF for the amusement and enlightenment of other people (as when I laugh at myself for being so wrong about Rutger Hauer).
No actual CRITICISM of ANYTHING that appears on this board appears to be acceptable - and will inevitably result in the in-unison fanboy poison-spitting that it has always resulted in.
But it's completely indisputable that the "Post-The-Same-Bit-of-Ancient-Crackypasta-Over-and-Over-Again-a-Hundred-Times" Guy IS making your board look like some kind of refugee camp for hopeless retards.
Every time he sees ANYTHING he doesn't like - regardless of whether it's child porn or a disquisition on modern cinematography - it's just the same tedious stupid "copy/paste/repeat" "copy/paste/repeat" until he's bumped and barged whatever he doesn't like off the front page.
I'm just pointing out that your debate about moderating is superfluous.
You already HAVE a "moderator".
He's self-appointed, has a mental age of three and the naturally fascist mentality that goes with that, and has probably never CREATED anything in his entire sad existence - just peevishly but indefatigably DESTROYED anything that dimly appears to him not to concord with the "four legs good, two legs bad" credo that is all that he has ever had the wit to commit to his chicken-sized memory and understanding.