>>7
OK, maybe I over-reacted (surprise, surprise).

It seems not to be developing into the usual shit-swamp.

Personally, I think the "division of labour" between CH and here could be a good thing.

You guys here think that the best way to preserve and develop a Cracky cult is to keep the focus firmly on Cracky.

Jeff, I think, has always had a slightly more oblique and complex approach to the same project, allowing room for forays further and further afield into regions that are only marginal to what Cracky was.

They're both valid approaches - as is borne out particularly if one develops the often-developed analogy with Christianity. (One of the most influential of 20th-Century Christian theologians - Dietrich Bonhoeffer - famously developed a vision of a "religionless Christianity").

Let's see how things develop, as neither you nor Jeff appear to be about to "give up and go home."