You're not sick, you have just separated the spiritual from the physical. Why do you think the likes of Faux are called 'Sisters of Mercy'?
They are 'Crackies' you can fap to without feeling guilty (not that I ever have but still...)

I guess it's all in the definition of sicker. I am attracted to women that are neither young or innocent who actually like doing things one could call debauchery, but I always was, way before I found Cracky, who I couldnt conceive of having sex with even if I tried...

But what is sick? In the end, I'd say as long as it feels good and all parties involved are consenting, whatever gets you through the night is, as the man says, allright...

>>2
This 'Sisters of Mercy' thing you said is actually very interesting.
Story time. Time ago, there was this very attractive teenager I'd cross with almost daily in the subway. Her gaze made me think she might like me. One day she was in the opposite platform and our gazes fixed. Then she lifted her hand in exactly the same way as in the related picture, so similar that I was shocked because of the unmistakable coincidence with Cracky. She became some sort of a side-obsession >>2
This 'Sisters of Mercy' thing you said is actually very interesting.

Story time. Time ago, there was this very attractive teenager I'd cross with almost daily in the subway. Her gaze made me think she might like me. One day she was in the opposite platform and our gazes fixed. Then she lifted her hand in exactly the same way as in the related picture, so similar that I was shocked because of the unmistakable coincidence with Cracky. Next day she would wait for me same time in my platform, yet from too near, she was not as Cracky as I had thought. However, she became some sort of a side-obsession regarding Crackles which this time with full sexual content.

Also, "separated the spiritual from the physical", isn't the very essence of Life and Her majesty quite close to the sort of force we rise with sex? Sex, our share of this life fountain, will never be worth of the purity of the immanent life permeating everything, yet they somehow seem related. Sometimes I feel as if there might be some trick, some hidden key with which to open communication with Her through sexuality (isn't ecstasy a common mark of the mystic?).

>>4
Oh Christ.

Now the would-be "informed" and would-be "religiously and philosophically interested" .71-users are going to gather together and blether on about "immanence" and "permeation" and about how fascinating and challenging they find each others' "views" on these matters (with only the very occasional false note being struck by a reference to the obviously pathetically delusional perceptions of a probable potential rapist ("next day she would wait for me same time in my platform".....yeah, sure she did).

The only remark about "Sisters of Mercy" made on this board that was even vaguely "interesting", or anything more than an insipid rehash of a few vapid pseudo-mystical catchphrases ("ecstasy","immanence","permeate" etc. etc.), was one I made a few days ago, which got the usual two standard .71 responses:

(i) I'm ignoring this, because if I respond to it I won't be the cleverest person in the thread.

and

(ii) Alex is a pedo RavRav is a whore lolol

Please, guys. Stick to your appropriate level:

"I wuv Cracky. Yes I do."

>>5
Don't forget the would-be trolls who are going to comment on it all, nor the have-become pedo wankstains who are going to comment on anything and everything.

>>5
TL;DR

HEY GUYS LETS STOP ARGUING WITH WORDS THAT HIRT MY HEAD! HOW BOUT A JERK SESSION IN TINYCHAN? WHO'S UP FOR IT? EEYYYYOOOOO!

>>6
As I've often said, I really don't know what a "troll" is supposed to be exactly, nor why I would be one.
My reaction to this sort of stuff is the same as the reaction of any normal intelligent person would be, I think, if they'd just made some intelligent and germane remarks on a subject that were sniggered at and spat on by a bunch of morons and then had to watch that same bunch of morons go off into the opposite corner of the room and stage a pretence of being deeply knowledgeable about and deeply interested by that same subject.

But forget it. I know you well enough by now, and I think you're even three-quarters aware yourselves of what pathetic preening clowns you are.

Don't mind me...Carry on with your charade....

>>9
So it's "have-become pedo wankstain" ? No real surprises there.

>>12
Oh, and please spare me the verbal diarrhoea.
tl;dr, thanks.

>>11FFS LRN2FUCKINGSPELL. DIARRHEA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&NR=1&v=IUzpP7YJfkk

Don't act like you didn't see this comin'

>>5
and this is what happens when you try to defy the resident pedophile in the many fields he is an expert

picture related, its Alex dying in Venezia

>>9
A troll is what you're doing: a post intented to shock the readers for no other purpose than the amusement you'll get from the response.

A troll is what you are, someone who posts unwelcomed posts, designed to infuriate the readers into disproportionate reaction for his own amusement, which he then claim is only incidental.

Like you would if you were hanging out on Mormon boards out of "fascination", which translate as insulting Mormons for you, exposing them to the righteous wrath of the superhero you think you are until they give up their wicked ways.

You are of incredible bad faith. The response to the one post you posted that wasnt a troll was a post saying, "I dont want to argue with you as we always do, I just want to tell you that a post without animosity is refreshing, if there were more, I may finally see a point in discussing anything with you".

I guess I was over-optimistic.

>>16

All I read was "Hi! I'm a pompous wordy cunt"

>>4
I guess we have too different a conception of deity to have a common ground. My impression is that Gods who have sex with mortal are usually less interested in the well being of mortals than their own.

I refuse to believe that Our Lady is like that. I also refuse to believe She sent the Holy Avatar to communicate to us through sex. If it were the case, I would think She would have sent a overly sexual woman who talked about sex all the time rather than such a very young girl, only ever cute and sweet.

We have seen some of harlots in the Crackyverse, and I saw nothing divine in them, however sexy they may have been...

>>17
You never could read, I'm not too concerned...

Praying to the Skyqueen above for you niggers so that you can find something worthwhile to do.

>>20
...something worthwhile like shit posting

>>21

..that fuels the dying embers of this ungodly place.

>>22
like, throwing oil on a fire?

>>23

like diesel on a gas engine

>>23
I mean, it's not like there was a guy here intent on getting Alex in a fight with Crackyfags, for his own amusement and the eventual destruction of a board he's forsaken, right?

Tell me I'm just paranoid, please...

>>25

Not sure about the forsaken part, but if you're just paranoid, then we both are.

>>25 Fuck off Alex you cunt. YOU are the only one wanting to destroy this board, you've explicitly said so on multiple occasions, you insufferable hypocrite. Nobody wants you here, only your many socks and other scum from CH who are also dedicated to destroying this board.

You degenerate, useless old man.

>>27
I have no doubt Alex enjoys being "used" in this way, but no, there is a malevolent troll here that tries to spark conflict any way he can...

There is certainly more than one troll who has been active for months now. Alex, as always, is the most vicious and unrepentant, but he is not alone.

>>29

Oh wait?! Is reply coupled with a pic of a Japanese actor?! I'm so awed by the obscurity! By god you are oozing with wit and hipness!

>>31
Schwilliam fighting with his socks again?

>>32 maybe but how the hell could you tell? I still doubt that schwill started trolling after making a post to Gayry asking for better administration.

I always assume that 50% of all posts here are from Schwill socks anyway but the Admiral is cool, he usually makes astute analyses of current Crackydrama, although he seems to have a weird fixation on Alex as a scapegoat for everything...

Well, who doesnt...

As long as Our Lady comes first...

>>I always assume that 50% of all posts here are from Schwill socks anyway

lol

>>34 Do you think the Admiral could be the Monkey? I thought that before, I even looked back to see the first time the Admiral appeared onsite. The monkey has been conspicuously absent for much of this period of shiteposting.

am stil here, no admiral, not me, no sir

just hidin til the end of the civil war, y'all too mean, this aint no fun

>>35
too high? too low?

>>38 I have no idea, I was laughing because it's a funny, and most excellent comment. As usual, I think the Monkey is right about everything. Go Moneky. I will try to copy the Monkey.

>>39
As usual, you're over-dramatizing this whole thing, probably because ideas about "campaigns to destroy the board", people pretending to be people they're not and so on, make you feel important.

I'm perfectly prepared to be friendly to Crackyfags and to treat you with respect if you give me any reason to respect you.

The problem is that 90% of the time, 90% of you behave like the most pathetic and ridiculous clowns and self-deluding mediocrities one is likely to find ANYWHERE on the Internet - and that's certainly saying something.

You blether on about "the Divine" and "the mystical" and so on but prove unable to actually have an intelligent conversation about ANY of these topics if someone invites you to have one.

You're so fucking dim that you don't even seem to realize what fools and liars you are making of yourselves when you plaster the board with wild vicious accusations that boil down pretty much to this: "Alex Reynolds is a pedophile because he's sexually attracted by a 22-year-old cam-whore. Fuck off pedophile and let us get on with our 'worship' of a rather underdeveloped 15-year-old."

CH is not so annoying these days because - although the stupid /b/board "nahnah yure a pedo" bullshit is probably still likely to spring up there from one moment to another - the people who post there have pretty much accepted what they are. It's a cheap silly image-board where you can make dirty jokes about cam-girls, nothing more.

If I take an occasional swipe at this place, though, it's because all the puffed-up, sad little mediocrities who think they're "deeper than that" have now settled in here.

I'd be only too happy if you WERE "deeper than that" - but you're not and you don't want to be.

Your clumsy, semi-literate posing and attitudinizing about an allegedly "asexual" "worship" of a barely pubescent girl - whose appeal, I'm afraid to have to tell you, IS incontrovertibly pedophilic in a way that, say, RavRav's NEVER was at any time that I knew her - is one of the most laughable and despicable phenomena currently witness-able on the Internet. You can't expect to engage in that sort of hypocritical pompous rubbish and not get casually pissed on by any intelligent individual who happens to pass your way, "agenda" or not.

>>40
nah dude, it's not because everything for you is about cheap sex that it is for everybody else

also, we only pretend to be deep, and know we're just playing at it

you have no excuse

>>40

There is a troll that as been tricking you in being his instrument of mass disruption by calling you a pedophile, and you are only too happy to oblige.

You have to be either the dumbest useful idiot there is, or your're doing this willingly, out of pure malice.

Either way, you're no better than the troll. Who wants to discuss anything with a troll, let alone anything "deep"?

Fuck right off troll is all I'll ever have for you.

This place doesn't even begin to break the waters of pathetically pretentious sites that love to dabble in stupid shit. Stop hyperbolizing.

>>40

>whose appeal, I'm afraid to have to tell you, IS incontrovertibly pedophilic

barely pubescent does not qualify for pedophilia. by definition pedophilia applies to prepubescent children.

if you are honestly saying that any appeal in Cracky comes from "incontrovertibly pedophilic" desires then you really are fucking stupid. i mean i've read what people say about you but until now i hadn't really agreed with them. i've avoided posting in threads like this so i don't fuel them myself, but christ that has to be the stupidest sweeping generalisation i've ever read on here

>>40
says the guy who openly admits to regularly getting off to 14-16 year old girls on stickam

>>40
"sad little mediocrities who think they're "deeper than that" have now settled in here."

Apparently, even though they keep promising to LEAVE.

Oh, and I forgot, fuck off.

Noone wants you, noone needs you. There is no silent majority who secretly appreciates you being here. Just fuck off.

>>45

What kind of sick bastard prefers kids over traps?! Traps all the way son.

pic related

>>1

>Ohai anon

Stopped right there. DIE BOXXYFAG, DIE CECIL.

guys, guys, I think I figured it out

the troll is Rav Rav, and she's just giving an excuse to Alex so he can get in and get ritually humiliated, it's part of their sex thing

I feel dirty just being in this thread