>>4
Oh Christ.

Now the would-be "informed" and would-be "religiously and philosophically interested" .71-users are going to gather together and blether on about "immanence" and "permeation" and about how fascinating and challenging they find each others' "views" on these matters (with only the very occasional false note being struck by a reference to the obviously pathetically delusional perceptions of a probable potential rapist ("next day she would wait for me same time in my platform".....yeah, sure she did).

The only remark about "Sisters of Mercy" made on this board that was even vaguely "interesting", or anything more than an insipid rehash of a few vapid pseudo-mystical catchphrases ("ecstasy","immanence","permeate" etc. etc.), was one I made a few days ago, which got the usual two standard .71 responses:

(i) I'm ignoring this, because if I respond to it I won't be the cleverest person in the thread.

and

(ii) Alex is a pedo RavRav is a whore lolol

Please, guys. Stick to your appropriate level:

"I wuv Cracky. Yes I do."