ooooh yea

I imagine that this was provoked by some implication on my part - probably in the CH Tinychat - that the OP, whoever he was, lacked knowledge or intelligence.

It's kind of ironic that the present thread, far from vindicating him in this respect, only confirms my implication.

He's got the penis-size about right, admittedly, and he's not shot entirely wide of the mark in speculating that my repertoire of masochistic fantasies includes anal penetration by / in the presence of attractive young women.

But how stupid and / or ignorant does one have to be to imagine that the sallow, underdeveloped, English half-child that you people worship / pretend to worship here could POSSIBLY play even the most marginal role in such fantasies?

Know The Enemy before you launch your puny little darts at him, OP - otherwise you'll end up with something that is neither effectively insulting nor even distantly witty.

>>5
tl;dr
another self-deprecating yet selfcentred invitation to induce more drama about yourself no doubt.

fuck off, alex

>>6
You people really fucking amaze me.

Would any of you care to provide your real name, address, telephone number, etc. - all of which, in my case, came into circulation in the Crackyverse through no doing of mine - and then sit back without comment, so as not to "cause drama", while some spotty little idiot takes photos of what is presumably his own butthole and holds signs saying "Come and fuck me I'm (insert your name here)" next to it?

Not that I really give much of a shit, but I think all the same that my reaction is a reasonable and natural one.

some one is using Alex as an instrument to deface .71, I.E as shit to be smeared all over the altar, and he's only too happy to oblige

in fact, this all turns him on

>>8
Possibly over at Crackyhouse at the moment, it would, a little - as it's presently a jolly, irreverent place, regularly visited by several attractive young women and even modded by one (snob dyke hipster bitch though she be).

But this place is indeed, as you say, a "temple" - i.e. a dank, deserted sausage-fest full of sad paedophiles and closet homosexuals, the idea of whose eyes on a butthole presumed (falsely) to be mine does not turn me on in the least.

>>9
your presence here and the enthusiasm you display in what is the application of just another layer of shit on a decidedly defaced altar belies that statement

>>10
You don't seem to be addressing my point.

If someone posts a photo of an open butthole with a sign saying "I'm Alex Reynolds, come and fuck me" next to it, obviously I'm going to be "present".

You sound like the people who blame the US government for 9/11.

The only people responsible for defacing 71 with buttholes are the people who post buttholes - and that wasn't me.

Now lighten up, stop your idiot Cracky-spamming and join in the amusing disintegration of the Crackyverse over at CH.

So many exciting developments!

RavRav is about to begin a new life of whoring, self-discovery and Sapphism over in London. I am preparing my next emigration - from Paris to New York - and the turquoise-haired kike Hellenist Opie is soon to begin a shining existence among the "jeunesse dorée" in the part of Oxford Cracky never got to see.

None of this has anything to do with the Sky-Queen - thank God - but its a lot of fun all the same.

>>11

>...join in the amusing disintegration of the Crackyverse over at CH

He may not be adressing your point, but you're proving his his...

hey alex, you're always saying how everything is shit and you hate everyone on CH (well, most),why do you still visit regularly? surely you don't enjoy the company of the people there, and even the ones you find attractive share a mutual disdain with you

>>13
DUUUUUH motherfuckah

PHOTO OF SOMEONE'S BUTTHOLE

BIG SIGN SAYING "I AM ALEX REYNOLDS FUCK ME"

DUUUUUUUH

As I say, if you lack all capacity for empathy and imagination, please feel free to add your full real name, address, profession etc. to this thread.

I'll have someone post degrading anonymous photos with YOUR name plastered all over them and then you can experience yourself how it feels to be in the dilemma:

Say something and you're being a hypocrite

Say nothing and we'll piss all over you for as long as we like

>>14
By the way, if you want to get rid of me, just do what Kimi very quickly and very sensibly did over on CH.

Delete this crap.

No?

OK, then, stop complaining.

keep piling it up Reynolds

past "it's not my ass", it's all double team trolling

like anybody here would want this pic here anymore than your constant whining

>>16
Nonsense.

You know yourself that I don't "double team" with anyone.

It's not my style.

I really don't give much of a shit about your board - until it's used as a place to shit on ME from.

>>17
a troll has only to post some slanderous line or pic about you, then insult you on your inevitable response to have you fly at the handle at us, who really never wanted the pic or line in the first place

you know this, yet you still accept to be used like that, just to exact your vengeance on the place you dont give a shit about

double team indeed

>>18
Then level the playing field.

Cut out the cowardly "Anon" crap, post your name, telephone number etc., so that I, or anyone who happens to be pissed at you, can attack you personally, and we'll see how YOU deal with the situation.

has nothing to do with me, has everything to do with you and your over the top reactions

this troll is using you to troll .71, and you're only too happy to oblige

if it wasnt the case, this wouldnt have gone past "it's not my ass"

there's no playing field, except for the trolls

I almost admire the dedication. Showing your tiny weewee and ugly ass only to troll Alex and the board?

>>21
at this size of a picture, it could very well be shopped

noone except for you has to do anything Reynolds. Just fuck off already.

noone knows, noone cares about your little antics of going out of your way to be offended at something posted here noone but you gives a fuck about.

>>"Maybe you should blah blah blah ..."

I remember the guy running wish (hah, forgot his name) posted his drivers license, including name, address, etc at some point.

And .... NOTHING HAPPENED.

Maybe it has something to do with you being an extraordinarily large douche who keeps turning up uninvited.

Alex's initial response to this thread was not out of line. All you had to do was let it stand, but instead you engaged him in an argument. You must bear your own responsibility for starting this argument, Alex didn't start it.

>>25
"Alex's initial response to this thread was not out of line."

Yes it was.

"provoked by some implication on my part - probably in the CH Tinychat - that the OP"

I don't fucking care about Alex Reynolds and what he does in "CH Tinychat" whatever the fuck that is. I don't want to know about the details of his miserable life. I don't care for him him taking every tard that posts something remotely tangential to himself as an excuse to expound endlessly about Alex Reynolds.
I don't want to hear about him. I don't want to hear of him. I want him to go away.
I don't care about how he pays 20 something year old girls for sexual gratification. I don't care if he posts nudes of himself online. I don't care about his trite views on life the universe and everything.

THEN WHY DO I KNOW ALL THIS SHIT ABOUT ALEX REYNOLDS ?
BECAUSE HE KEEPS COMING HERE TO TELL US ABOUT HOW IMPORTANT HIS LIFE IS AND GENERALLY MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO IGNORE HIM!

I just want him to fuck off.

>>26 It is possible to ignore Alex, just don't read his posts. It's not him posting porno and penises at .71

He reacted to OP's bait, and he didn't attack .71 or anyone in it in his initial response. If you don't want to argue with Alex, don't argue with him.

OH and also if anyone else noticed- MA is indeed monitoring his board, he deleted several posts from a few days ago. That's good news for anyone who still cares about Cracky.

>>26
"Something remotely tangential to himself"

i.e. a photograph of a naked ass and ball-sack with the owner of same holding a sign over them saying "I am Alex Reynolds, come and fuck me".

This is pretty representative of the respect for truth and fairness that most of the people who use this sight have.

Thank God - OK, Jesus, "Cracky", if you must - for the poster of 25 and 27, who - although he is clearly no great fan of mine - has simply been talking common sense in this matter.

I don't think it's egotism or self-centeredness when I say that the shit that began this thread was NOT, as people are suggesting, an attack on .71. (The same guy posted the same shit on Crackyhouse, and Kimi (although she also dislikes me) deleted it immediately). It was an attack on ME, and an attack of the cheapest and most lying, underhand sort.

It's fucking disgusting that, among the 28 posts on the thread that has grown out of this cheap attack, about 20 effectively just jump on the bandwagon and start laying into ME, as post 26 does.

>>29
Oh fuck, now I'm writing "site" as "sight"....

Oh what a noble mind is here o'erthrown.

Alex I may not be a fan of posts you make such as the outraged one about defacing Botticelli. However, I read with great interest your discussion a while back with the other German Romanticism afficinado. Interesting, and Cracky relevant. Apropos your last allusion to Hamlet, if all posters to .71 were held up to scrutiny, "who would 'scape whipping"?

>>27
Admiral, you have a point, but you should have spotted the obvious maneuver of >>6, who I have no doubt was the OP

after that, as I said, Alex is only too happy to use the excuse to give us the "sad paedophiles and closet homosexuals" treatment he's given us everytime something like this happens (I lost count)

yes, it was an attack on Reynolds, one that is bound to repeat itself given his habitual behavior which even he knows started this last incident, but mostly it was an succesfull effort to generate friendly cross fire

yes, the blame squarely resides with OP, but I can certainly blame Alex for being his willing instrument, which I still cant believe this self proclaim genius hasnt been aware was the point of OP's attack

I also cant help but notice that this happens as CH has a "please no butthole please" sign up, and that numerous voices, Alex included, are extolling the virtues of CH over .71

I may be paranoid, but I know maneuvers when I see them

Alex, I dont know who >>26, but you and I should recognize his legitimate exasperation, and I for one, understands it

>>29

I'm sure Kimi deleted it BECAUSE she dislikes you, and not to save your "reputation"...

This is an obvious attack by the monk on the person of Alex Reynolds, whom he picked as an easy target to mark for this type of attack, just so he can "save the day" .I have no doubt, whatsoever that OP is indeed the monk, and that the pictures are his. Fuck off, troll monk. We don't need your pathetic shite around here. Go find someplace else to play "hero"

>>28 We have a mod, so fuck your shite, monk. Fuck right off.

Elephants in 3,2,1.

>>34
except that "Alex Reynolds" is a room full of labcoats at the Research Institute for Apllied Douchery in Lausanne, Switzerland, and not "a person"

>>34
So, you're changing your target again, OP?

>>28

Cracky bless him

>>34

feeling exposed, the troll plays all his cards

this is what the troll wanted all along, a fight between Alex and the monk

>>34
This is just some random old weirdo that was doing requests on a 4chan thread. Thread was posted on tinychat, people wanted to have some fun, that's all.

Explaining because I hate seeing shitloads of paragraphs of boring drama here.

>>39,>>38,>>36,>>35

>Feeling exposed, SAMEMONK plays all his cards.

>>39
Thanks for the explanation.

It makes no sense at all, of course, as an explanation. But it IS pretty instructive as to the blinkered, infantilically self-absorbed attitudes that reign in places like this.

It's just some "random" old weirdo, who "randomly" decided to stick a sign next to his opem butt that happened "randomly" to be my name. And here I come, as usual, "trying to make this all about me" and "distracting" from the much more serious business of this board (which, as far as I can see, consists in bumping five-year-old Crackypasta back to the top of the front page over and over and over and over again until even YOU get sick of it).

That's YOUR story, at least. The story of self-obsessed and self-deluding idiots who see every piece of shit that gets dumped here as a battle in some great imaginary cosmic war, the idea of which has got lodged in your head from playing too many video games.

The fact is that there is NO war or plot or conspiracy against .71, since the place is so minuscule and so utterly content-less and unimportant that no one with enough brains and will to mount a conspiracy would ever bother to do so.

It's not egoism at all, but rather simple statement of fact, if I say that these posts were neither "random" nor "about .71", but rather entirely and exclusively ABOUT ME.

I don't really know who this guy "the Monk" is, or whether the person who did this goes by that name. But it's pretty obvious to me that the story behind it is the same one as has been being played out on Cracky boards for four years now: someone starts being very pretentious or very silly on some board or in some chat; I point out that this is the case; he runs off with his infinitely swollen and fragile little ego aching and stinging with humiliation and - being unable to retort in any other way - pulls some shitty little coward's trick like trying to post my name on an anti-pedophile site or....this.

Very possibly, the tongue-tied, swollen-headed coward who did this is indeed some regular poster here on .71. But he didn't do it in pursuance of some "agenda" bearing on .71 itself. He did it because he happens to have been shown up, on one or maybe two occasions, as an idiot - by ME, and it is really just ME he wants to get back at. .71 is just being used as a random dump in this case, because he knows that people who come here are people who tend to know the name Alex Reynolds.

As I say, you only reveal how infantilically self-absorbed YOU are when you post things like post 39 on this thread, which treat it as a matter of complete indifference that ugly vicious lies are being spread about a named individual and dismiss all protests about such things as "boring" distractions from the "sacred" content of this board.

Alexander Reynolds
64 r Monceau
75008 PARIS

phone number: 01 77 11 65 83

>>41
Actually, trying to start fractricide wars on .71, wish or CH predates your coming here.

You are just an endless gift to that person...

I mean, there is no way you can set the matter to rest without insulting everybody, for this troll, this is precious: you can only aggravate his artificial conflict, which hardly ever takes shape when both targets approach this with more sense than you do now.

Also if I understood >>39, the pic are from an old weirdo that came on 4chan, doing request such as posing naked with your name on his butt, request made by someone who wanted to generate drama, something he knew he could force you to help him with, just like you did.

For a smart guy, you sure dont mind being a tool...

>>41
tl;dr
how about you finally, FINALLY, have a nice cup of SHUT THE FUCK UP ?
Why do you feel it's ANY of my business who you think slighted you or why you think it's important ? Start a blog called "The importance of being ALEX REYNOLDS" or something, but most importantly, SOD OFF.

NOT your board.
Not Alex's board.
BAD Alex!

>>41
a person with good intentions wouldnt come here at all if he thought this place was as bad as you describe it

the only reason you come here is to "mock this place", you know it, we know it and the troll knows it

all you needed was OP's invitation, so you could be as disruptive as you could while shifting the guilt on somebody else

at least be honest, you're evil, and you're getting what you seek from this place: mutual hatred, and the more, the better

>>45
I suppose that, of the five people who use this board, the three with the lowest IQs are sniggering and leering about how "Rennuz mad" now.

The other two, though, will see that all "umad?"s are better directed toward the idiot or idiots who made the last three posts and who insist(s) on holding to the babyish narcissism, and refusal to recognize that they are not the centre of the world, that I just mocked him/them for.

His / their insistence on this stupid "difference that makes absolutely no difference" - the photo is no more "random" if the butthurt coward who set it up used his OWN ass to hold my name against than it is if he had the tremendous luck of finding a genuine loony on 4chan who "took requests" in this respect - is already indication of how dumb, and utterly insensitive to the mere EXISTENCE of other human beings, they are.

But on top of that, he / they are off again here on their ridiculous egocentric fantasy about this having to do with "fratricidal wars" going back to "Wish" or some other dead episode in the (for him/them) oh-so-important Crackyfag saga.

As I say, though, this has absolutely nothing to do with these weird, cranky little issues that you want to try to present it as part of, because then at least there would be the APPEARANCE of evidence that SOMEONE EXCEPT YOU CARES about this whole sad, sterile, exhausted "Cracky" nonsense.

Only a mentally-ill idiot like you would believe in that appearance, however, because this shit quite evidently has ZERO, ZILCH, NADA to do with "Wish", or ".71" or "fratricide", or any of your largely imaginary "Cracky community" bullshit.

It was posted at a point in time when I hadn't touched this board in weeks and is quite evidently, as I've said, just the cowardly vendetta of some guy who is desperate to believe that he is terribly, terribly clever and interesting and who has had the sad balloon of this belief punctured by some (probably brief and casual) remark of mine.

It's not about "fratricide", because there are no "brothers" in your little Cracky playpens who might "kill" one another. It's about the endlessly fragile inflated egos of inarticulate, bitter, vindictive little men who just MUST MUST MUST be the bull-goose boardfag and are not above ANY petty, self-degrading scratch or bite - name-and-address-posting, infantile midnight phonecalls, taking pictures of their own butthole - to get back at someone they feel has pushed them out of this position.

This shit has been posted here because your board is an empty lot which is unable to generate the tiniest bit of interesting independent content and is therefore up for grabs to be used as a toilet by anyone whose ego is prompting them to do a biiiiiiig shit somewhere.

>>46
Jesus.
TL;DR

STOP POSTING. A retarded DOG would have gotten the message by now. Just how dense can one exactly be ?

STOP POSTING. GO SEEK HELP.

(not here, go seek help elsewhere I mean)

>>46
I mean, honestly...

It's true that, after I've made a post like this last one, I look at the invective in it and think "Am I provoking these guys?"

But then I look at the ABSOLUTE MORAL INSANITY evidenced by the preceding posts -

the implication, for example, that I most likely prompted a "sock-puppet" of mine to prompt a mad pervert to have photos taken of his open asshole with my name next to it, so that I would have "the excuse I needed" to come here and "hate" -

and I see that AS GOOD AS NOBODY who posts on this board has the decency to say even -

"Hold on, we've got this completely ass-backwards (no pun intended); Reynolds was leaving us completely alone and he's only here now because our board is being used as a platform for obscene personal insults against him" -

and I think -

"Nah, fuck it, these guys deserve ANY shit I care to throw at them"

>>48
honestly ?

You have a problem that resembles Asperger's. You don't fit in, and aparently you can't see why even though you seem to try and it only makes you angry/bitter.
It's a good thing you have mental qualities that allow you to have and hold a job, so it's not a completely disabling condition.
But do try to find a fulfilling hobby, instead of posting online, that doesn't require social interaction (woodworking, get a dog, enter a 'write a novel in 30 days' competition, etc).

You'll be happier, we'll be happier. honestly.

>the implication, for example, that I most likely prompted a "sock-puppet" of mine to prompt a mad pervert to have photos taken of his open asshole with my name next to it, so that I would have "the excuse I needed" to come here and "hate"

do you even read the posts?

the implication is that the troll hates us both and goads you into doing his dirty work, that you know it but do it anyway because you like doing his dirty work

all this arguing can only be to cover that last fact

also, your charges of a fragile ego persecuting you on account of a past slight cant be taken seriously once one has heard you answer the question "why are you here Alex" by "Rav Rav gave Jeff email I wrote her on stickcam. Jeff posted them as an exemple of very inventive stalking. People pissed all over them, now I mostly just write mocking this place."

the real implication is that any pretext is good to get back at this nebulous entity that slighted you

>>49
I don't know about my mental condition, but YOU certainly seem to suffer from one that can only be described as seriously defective.

What is it? Serious short-term memory loss? Or just inability to perform simple logical operations?

I ask because your post, like the previous ones, seems to indicate that you are absolutely RACKING YOUR BRAINS wondering WHAT ON EARTH might have prompted me to say a few things on .71 THIS week in particular.

"Is it his demonic, hate-filled, arbitrarily vindictive character?" you puzzle, "Could be, could be...."

"The photo of some guy's ass with a sign next to it saying 'I'm Alex Reynolds, come and fuck me' that keeps being bumped to the top of the board?" The link between THAT and my interventions seems to be one that your mental problems DO appear to be preventing you from making.

Or is it rather on the plane of MORAL reasoning that you are seriously defective?

Are you one of the (apparently several) people here who believe that one is being fair to someone when one places them before the choice:

EITHER let us carry on posting vicious obscene shit about you month after month and never say a word about it - in which case we can laugh our asses off in peace about what a pathetic cunt Alex Reynolds is.

OR raise objections to the vicious obscene shit that is posted here about me - in which case we can get all furious and self-righteous about what an obtuse and crazy and egomaniac cunt Alex Reynolds, who can't leave this board alone.

>>51
"I don't know about my mental condition"

Indeed you don't, that's the crux of the problem.

And yes, "too long; didn't read", but I can make up from the amount of caps it's the same ol' same ol' "the world vs alex reynolds" story, meaning you're probably not unwilling to take advice but are simply unable to. As long as you can tell your story, any excuse is allowed.

>>50
Again, this place would be slightly less disgusting if those of you who maintain at least the semblance of civil discussion also preserved a little respect for the truth.

You obviously paid fairly close attention to the chat in the CH Tinychat last night (which is were ALL this stems from, NOT from "Wish" or some ancient Crackyverse feud).

Not sufficiently close attention, though - or perhaps the ommissions in your account were made delieberately, just to prop up your portrait of me as a vindictive character.

The exchange you recount was with Ely, I think, the Belgian guy, and the bit you miss out was where he said

"If you still wrote posts as inventive as those you wrote a few years ago, I would read them".

My reply to THAT was: "If you remember, people used to piss all over my RavRav posts: That was how we gradually got to the point of my tending to post nothing but criticisms and condemnations of what goes on in the 'Crackyverse'".

I am aware that what I post these days is largely negative. But that tide was beginning to turn - I've seen several posts EVEN HERE approving of my posts on Romanticism a few weeks back - until this guy got butthurt and began posting crude fake porn of me. The fact that almost no one here has spoken up AGAINST that, but rather used it as an excuse for tirade after tirade against me, isnt helping.

anything beyond "it's not my ass" is playing in the hands of an obvious troll, willingly or not

I guarantee you the people you are arguing with dont want it on top of the board anymore than you do

your insistence on not acknowledging it is suspect but your constant fueling of this artificial conflict makes you a protagonist, not a victim

this is the problem, the one you keep being while blaming it on everything and everybody else

I also remember saying precisely what Ely was saying, numerous times over the years, guess what, there will be no real "warming up" until you stop being the tool of every passing troll but mostly, until you at least visibly try to have some control over yourself

here it is: the only thing you can blame in all this beyond the troll using you is your own rotten temper, and you know it

now shut the fuck up

I also liked Alex's discussion of Romanticism and Cracky, maybe if we were all more civil to each other it would be helpful? Civil replies breed civil posts.

>>55
I dont have a problem with that, but as long as Alex notion of civilities will include "But how stupid and / or ignorant does one have to be to imagine that the sallow, underdeveloped, English half-child that you people worship / pretend to worship here could POSSIBLY play even the most marginal role in such fantasies?" where a "guises, it's obviously not my ass, dont take the bait" would be infinitely less alienating, I dont see how this has any chance to ever stop repeating itself...

I said that countless times, with and without animosity and yet, here we are again...

>>56 Well we know for certain that MA is moderating .71, due to several post deletions last week. He's not going to ban Alex, so it would be better to at least try to remain civil. I know Alex is highly critical of the Monk and various other aspects of .71, but in the case of this thread he was not without provocation. Again, this thread didn't turn into an argument until people pounced on Alex after he objected (understandably) to OP. Whether or not the OP deliberately trolled to start an "Alex v the World" argument or not is immaterial to the fact that Alex didn't pick this particular fight.

>>57
but is not immaterial to whether this is going to repeat itself over and over

also I never asked for moderation of Alex posts or eve a ban, just for Alex moderating himself, or putting it in term I heard him use, to address his "lack of tact" before demanding it from people who I repeat, have not necessarily showed him the disrespect he now throws around indiscriminately

again, if this had been an isolated incident...

I see shitloads of paragraphs of boring drama could not be avoided. Oh well, silly of me to expect that it could.

Successful troll is successful.

High five lil' bro!

>>1
>>2
>>3
>>6
>>34
>>40
>>59
>>60
stating the obvious here, but samegloatingtrollfaggot

>>61

And of course to nobody's surprise the troll is the monk. /gasp! Didn't see that one coming.

>>62
hello again OP

He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.

HORSE HOCKEY

>>46

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority

>>1
Is this penis circumcised or not?

I guess you came to reoll

fuck you

>>68
What is reoll?

on the keyboard, E and R are one off to the left from R and T

you should be used to this particular typo by now

>>70 Shut up Alex.

>>71
fuck off reoll

>>72 Does your screen not show you the words that you type? Do you not have a backspace?

>>73
fuck off reoll

fuck off reoll

fuck off reoll

fuck off reoll

It's spelt "roll".

questions?

you got your answer

fuck off reoll

It's spelt "roll".

no, nothing TRoll, it's spelt bumping a shit-post to the top on the flimsiest pretext

hence

fuck off reoll

have another one

fuck off reoll

fuck off reoll

fuck off reoll

and fuck off reoll

so, what good reason would anyone have to bump this to the top except reolling?

you get the picture

fuck off TROLL

>>86 Why have you bumped it 25 times? Do you need the attention that badly?

>>87
why have you brought it up to the top again?

what is it with trolls and attention, and blaming their behavior on others

wait, tl:dr

fuck off troll

>>88
Stop bumping the fucking thread

>>89
you just did

I only ever told you to fuck off while it was at the top

so again

fuck off troll

>>90
Learn to sage, kiddo.

sage doesnt work here

fuck off newf... fock off troll

>>92
Seems to work fine for me. If it doesn't work for you, stop posting. You're bumping the fucking thread.

it doesnt, and hasnt for years

fuck right off troll

>>94 If you think that's the case, than stop posting. I'm tired of seeing your fucking asshole.

fuck off troll is all you get, asshole

HINT: sage goes in the e-mail field.

>>97
then why is your post on top?

oh you know, sage doesnt work here

so

fuck off troll

>>98 Every time I look you're the last post on the thread & it's back up near the top. You claim sage doesn't work but I can hover over the name on my posts & the "sage" link is there clear as day. It's not on your posts, though, which indicated to me that you don't even know how to sage.

there is no sage button on my screen u faggots give me better instructions

>>99
you idiot

that's because I bump your shitposts down every time you bump them back up

great thread or greatest thread

>>102
no and stop asking

great thread or greatest thread