I mean how do you explain wings + ears + nose.
Is it a bird?

Just a note for your reference once the niggers are gone and a style of stupidity more traditional on this site has settled back into its rightful position of dominance once again.

The "pretenshusness" you all claim to despise so much can be much more accurately and usefully defined than just as "the dropping of famous names from intellectual history and the evoking of famous terms and concepts". Namely, as "the dropping of famous names from intellectual history and the evoking of famous terms and concepts IN A WAY THAT PLAINLY INDICATES YOU HAVE NO ACTUAL FAMILIARITY WITH THE WORKS AND CONCEPTS IN QUESTION and are using the names, terms and concepts SOLELY in oder to impress people even more ignorant than oneself."

For this reason, I think that the OP's post is definitely "the one to beat" as far as "pretenshusness" goes, since no one who has read even a brief general introduction to Plato, let alone acquired a whole book by him, will still be labouring under the misconception that the classification of living entities into "species", "genera" etc. is his work. It is of course, as anyone with even a basic education is aware, the work of Aristotle.

I propose that - since the bar set by the first post in this thread as regards infantile, destructive pissing and shitting on the cultural legacy of the Occident is such a VERY high one and not likely to be attained again, let alone surpassed, by subsequent posters - the thread be now converted into the old reliable "let's scrawl and doodle like retarded six-year-olds over some masterpieces of Western painting" sort of thread.

I attach an image of Giorgone's subtle, intriguing and infinitely precious "La Tempesta" for Crackyfags to relieve themselves on in their accustomed style and manner.

>>3
Shut up

and

Fuck off

>>3
Shut up Alec. No one gives two tugs of a dead dogs cock what you have to say.

>3

Oh shit, a post I can agree with.

>>3
Piss off you limber dicked cocksucker or I will buttfuck your soil

Alex you don't like niggers? How do you feel about chinks?

>>8
As is true of most of the entities that make up the experienceable universe, the likeability and desirability of niggers is dependent on what particular experience you wish to derive from them.

Certainly, for anyone who still has any use in their personal psychical economy for the good old "masculine principle", niggers are pretty much indispensable. What with the progressive feminization of the white race and the degeneration of our once-proud penes into something like vestigial organs - perhaps I should only speak for myself here; I'm certainly an egregious and deplorable example of both tendencies, but I suspect I'm far from being an exception - "male" and "nigger" have currently reached the point of being just about synonymous with one another. In other words, the only hope that still exists of that awesome and precious "feminine principle" that is potential in such a delectable creature as the long-departed Camel, for instance, being brought to manifest itself in the actually experienceable world lies in the vigorous intervention of a nigger, which "males" like you and I can hope, at most, to be allowed to observe from afar. Admittedly, rumour has it that a Russian or Ukrainian might do here "at a pinch" - but I think this case is covered, and reconciled with my central thesis, by Pushkin's point that Russia's essential contribution to Western civilization consisted in its sacrificing itself to barbarism in order that Europe might be preserved from barbarism. (Moreover, if I'm not mistaken, recent Slavonic scholarship has revealed that Pushkin, of all people, knew whereof he spoke here, being not only the founder of modern Russian literature but yes, himself a nigger, apparently).

As to chinks, don't even get me started. I wasted four years and more of my fucking life trying to find out just what useful or pleasurable experiences might be derived from THOSE yellow, wizened little bastards. The answer, it turned out, is NONE! They're a complete waste of space and obviously some sort of major abberation in God's providential plan for the human species.

I suppose the stupidity of my error here is mitigated by the special circumstances applying at the time - the late 70s / early 80s - when I first began to toy with the idiotic idea of becoming a sinologist. Mao Zedong was only a couple of years dead and he was such an imposing, Faustian, virile figure - I can VIVIDLY imagine him jovially flipping his trademark blue-denim cap onto Camel's luxuriant flowing Caucasian tresses as she knelt and devoted, with blissful subservience, her perfect little strawberry of a mouth to the service of his surely Africanly-proportioned yellow rod - that it was easy to ignore, in those days, how UTTERLY unrepresentative of ALL his other countrymen he surely was.

>>9
Words words words
tl;dr alec loves nigger cock.
You could even go as far as to say he is a 'double nigger.'

>>3
Every one knows Plato is for birds - shut the fuck up Alex.

But as far as pretenshusness goes, you'll have to pick up the slack, the clergy is busy with revolushuns. Shit happens. Fuck anti-revisionism in the ass and fuck neo-liberalism in the face. Mao, Tatcher, same bitch. Ah, dont get me started...

But prophecies being what they are, who said you'd be back? (no merit on this one, though)

Oh and fuck your tumbnails.

No props for predicting Alex will be back. That said, at least Alex honestly answers provocative questions, and in some detail. Also, despite the TL;DR factor, I much prefer that to the TS;NP factor prevalent at this site.
(Too Stupid; No Point)

alex i hav never had a blow job from a man but u hav had soe much prcatice sucking of jeff and mero i think u would bee good at it so chocke on it, nigger.

>>13
It's true that I did have a sort of (largely - as pretty much always in my case - cerebralized and verbalized) "cock-sucking" thing going with Mero there for a while.

It was all part of the (with hindsight and by comparison with the blighted and joyless present situation) rather jolly fun of all varieties that was going on on Crackyhouse about six months ago.

I don't think I've ever engaged or wanted to engage in anything resembling a "cock-sucking" relation with Jeff, though. Certainly not in any real or literal sense - as I say, I didn't even go that far with Mero. "dog-and-master" video-games notwithstanding - but not in the sense that I imagine you mean either: i.e. the sense of expressing an affection and admiration for him that could be preceived as verging on the adulatory and sycophantic.

It's true that I did feel a degree of admiration and affection for Jeff at one time. He seemed to me, for years, to be a basically decent and intelligent guy of a sort that it is very unusual to encounter in a milieu like this and, for all its faults, Crackyhouse, I think, was, from 2007 up to last year, a valid and credible attempt to maintain a forum for a certain shared interest / obsession / whatever (assuming, that is, that one considers obsessing for years over a girl who clearly doesn't approve of people obsessing about her to be even potentially a "valid" activity, which I'm not sure I do, but that's another question entirely).

I've lost all respect for Jeff in the last year or so, though. Personally, I think the state of this site is a very strong argument in favour of the position that the Cracky thing is just over now, and should be put out of its misery. However you come down on that question, though, there can be no argument about the fact that what Jeff is currently doing, encouraging, and tolerating over on Crackyhouse is cancelling out whatever merit and "moral credibility" he may have acquired in the "Crackyverse" over the past five or six years.

The only material that he still has to work with is this one attention-starved, mentally-ill little chav girl and the five or six charmless male sycophants who - for reasons that frankly remain a mystery to me - seem to enjoy skipping and yelping aroud her, getting excited about whatever she gets excited about, for months on end. "What she gets excited about" seldom if ever includes anything with even a tenuous connection with Cracky...

(oddly, or maybe not so oddly, nobody on CH ever seems to comment on the fact that every one of Lia's magnanimous and unselfish "let's-do-a-thread-about-Cracky" threads begins with a photo of herself and turns, at most within the space of two more posts, into a thread about Lia)

...so any kudos that has to go to Jeff for dropping in on Lia and her gang once a year and posting something that IS Cracky-related is neutralized and more than neutralized by the fact that Jeff's once-a-year Cracky posts give Lia the excuse that she's gagging for to jabber on constantly about her and her "Crackyfags", how "proud she is of the Crackyverse right now" etc. while in fact queening it over a board that is about nothing but her and her cheap, chavvy little fads and pastimes.

If Jeff actually were the decent and intelligent person I once believed him to be, he'd certainly scrap his board at this point - or, alternatively, just call it what it is: "A Board for Lia and Her Friends to Post Any Shit They Like On", so that at least Lia might shut up at last with all this lying annoying "Crackyfags" bullshit.

Why doesn't he?

Again, I have to admit I'm as stuck for an answer to that question as I am for one to the question of why five or six not-entirely-stupid young men spend half their lives with their tongues stuck up the ass of a no-class, evidently loony, and not particularly sexually attractive girl like Lia.

It doesn't seem very plausible to me that two people like Jeff and Kimi feel they need the "ego-bolstering" that comes from administering and moderating an (extremely low-traffic) site. I think they both have lives, and other sources of ego-bolstering - as is indicated clearly enough, indeed, by the fact that neither of them feel any need or temptation to actually socialize with the users of the site they're running and just leave Lia and the other worthless chavs who are standing in for "Crackyfags" to their own devices.

Why, then? As I say, it beats me. Some private agenda they believe (rightly, apparently) Lia and her arse-lickers are stupid and desperate enough to allow themselves to be used for without being let in on what aim is actually being pursued?

Whatever the truth about the matter, I've lost, as I say, all my respect for anyone consciously or unconsciously involved in it.

>>14
Just like a woman.

>five or six charmless male sycophants who - for reasons that frankly remain a mystery to me - seem to enjoy skipping and yelping aroud her, getting excited about whatever she gets excited about, for months on end.

its becuase they r faggots who cant get any pussy ROFL ROFL

>>15
Think you're taking the "I'm so cool and imperturbable and I don't waste words" /b/board tough-guy oldfag schtick just a LITTLE bit too far there, old chap...

I'm not saying your post isn't soooooooo impressively laconic and effortless and super-chill and so on and so forth, and doesn't demonstrate your immense superiority to the tl,dr word-bore who posted before you...

It's just that the word-bore's post had an identifiable meaning - albeit one that may be open to disagreement - whereas your pithy little four-word dismissal is just a little TOO pithy for ANYONE TO HAVE ANY FUCKING IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO SAY WITH IT.

Take my advice. Next time you think you have something you want to say about something, try to remember to throttle back on the "mot juste" ego-tripping JUST enough to give us less ineffably witty mortals a fighting chance to form some vague idea of the point that you think you are making.

>>16
I honestly think it must be a little more complicated than that.

I'M a faggot who can't get any pussy, and would be proud to still have a waistline like the admirable gentleman in the photo, and even I was only able to tolerate Lia's Brobdingnagian narcissism, lumpenprole tastelessness and profound nastiness of character for about six weeks tops.

you came back here to endlessly bitch and whine about what's going on at CH

bitch bitch bitch whine whine whine

"just like a woman" sound about right

>>19
Actually, I've made two pretty lengthy posts on here in the past 24 hours, as well as a couple more shorter ones.
If you're fixating on the one that responds to some insinuations about my attitude to Jeff, and hence my attitude to Crackyhouse, and making the false claim that this is what I go on about "endlessly", then the only explanation for that is "bitching and whining" about various petty little individuals defines the limit of what YOU can understand or make anything of.
I think there's a place and a justification for telling some home truths about Lia, her arse-lickers, and Jeff's shitty, self-serving, cynical encouragement of them. They have, after all, succeeded in totally fucking up a board that might potentially have been a little amusing.
But if talking about that kind of stuff bores you and you find it despicably "womanish", fine...You got anything you want to respond to the more or less equal number of lines I wrote about such rather more "masculine" topics as Russian literature and the philosophy of race two or three posts before that?

No? Your little girly-pussy excuse for a mind can't handle "heavy" stuff like that?

Then fuck you and Bob Dylan...

>>17

>>18

LOL u lameass fags y dont u lick the cum out each others asses like the faggots that u truly r ROFL ROFL

>>21
The pic is rather well done. I see the pixels ect.

>>22

it wanst me what done it i just posted it coz i know a certain person doesnt leik it

>>1
after doing years of research and seeing her take on many forms from a nurse to a cracken and also a witch i have thierfore come to the conclusion that Cracky is a Amorphous double nigger... but then again ive been up days huffing the fumes from random panties and smelly girl socks

>>20
bitch bitch bitch whine whine whine

you're worst than Lia

>>24
but even when Cracky morphs into an Amorphous Double Nigger she is still the cutest thing to be a non creepy creepy stalker to

Alex what's with your hate obsessions? Not long ago you loved Lia is it because she told Rav that you were going to try to ruin her life?

>>27
I don't think I ever felt anything for Lia that could be even remotely described as "love".

I know that everyone who uses this board will be absolutely GAGGING to hear this, so let me give a brief summary of the essentials:

For about three years, I steered almost entirely clear of Lia. She was rather too young for me to find her interesting and her clique of admirers struck me as being particularly creepy and distasteful even by Crackyverse standards (pedophiles, occultists, 16-year-olds with the minds of 13-year-olds etc.) Those of you who've been around for a few years will remember a furous month-long flame-war between me and the "Lia Gang" on Crackyhouse in 2009, I think, which ended with Jeff splitting the board so that the "Lia Gang" could go and do their infantile creepy thing somewhere where people who weren't into that shit didn't have to look at them.

Between 2009 and 2012, as we know, the Crackyhouse side of the Crackyverse pretty much disintegrated. Camel vanished. Then Dolly vanished. There was a brief period around January, February, when a bit of female charm and stimulation was provided, in their stead, by RavRav, who was in the Tinychat about once a day. But then she moved to London and got a life - given to her, incidentally, by the current moderator of Crackyhouse, Kimi - so she hasn't been seen or heard from since around February either.

That pretty much left Lia as the only potential "love interest" in the Crackyverse. Let's face it, nobody wants a sausage fest (well, maybe some of you "monkish" types do, but that's another thing that puts a gulf between you and I).

It sounds pretty sad and sleazy to say that this was the point when I began to find Lia interesting, both on a personal and a sexual level - like I'm the sort of creep who can develop an "infatuation" with just about anyone who happens to be around, and switch the "infatuation" over to another girl when that one isn't around any more.

Well, maybe I'm not as far removed as I wish I were from being indeed just that sort of creep, but I'll say in my defence - and in a way in Lia's defence too - that when, at the beginning of this year, she and I fnally began to chat on MSN and so on, I DID begin to understand, to an extent, "what all the fuss had been about" among the "Lia Gang". I was surprised by how articulate and witty she was, and noticed for the first time, when she sent me a recent photo of herself, that she also really isn't a bad-looking girl at all. (She had rightly surmised that I wasn't into that Lolita wig-and-nail-extension bullshit at all, and the photo she sent me was of her looking very sober and student-y and, as I say, really rather attractive).

I can't and won't deny that we were pretty "close" for a couple of months there, around March / April. We got a very pleasant sort of sado/maso role-play game going for a few weeks, with her pretending to elicit promises from me that I was going to stop giving money to RavRav and start giving money to her instead and me pretending to actually give those promises.

I suppose one factor in things going rather sour between us in the past few months is that Lia probably wasn't actually "pretending" at all there. It seems she actually seriously BELIEVED that she was going to be the one who was going to get, from now on, the regular Paypal payments that I've been making to RavRav for years. A ridiculous idea, of course. Lia's a fairly pretty girl with certain appealng and attractive qualities, but RavRav is - for just about anyone, I think - in a different league of attractiveness altogether. And certainly FOR ME there is just no contest there. As soon as I got some more money, I gave it to RavRav and will ALWAYS give any excess income at my disposal ONLY to her, assuming she permits or requires it.

I'd bet my life, incidentally, that Lia's sudden concern a couple of weeks ago about "preventing RavRav's life from being ruined", and the "mission of mercy" she performed by writing to God knows who about my having done certain things to hurt her (things, of course, which I hadn't done and would never do), were not motivated by any actual worry about RavRav's well-being but rather solely by Lia's wish to do all she could to make sure that - if SHE's not going to get any of my money - RavRav sure as hell won't get any more of it either. If she's writing lying e-mails to her saying that I'm tryng to get her thrown off her course, that certainly isn't because she gives a damn how RavRav does or doesn't make a living. It's only because she wants to make relations between RavRav and I impossible so she doesn't have to sit there seething with envy all day over RavRav's profiting from someone she herself wasn't attractive enough to profit from.

This habit of spreading lies about people to soothe her own jealousy and vanity would have been enough in itself, of course, to lower Lia considerably in my opinion and rid me of any mild attraction and affection I felt for her. But my problem with the whole "Lia Thing" on Crackyhouse at the moment is, of course, much wider than that. The poor girl is deeply attention-starved and narcissistic to a degree that's unusual even in 4chan cam-whores and Jeff's and Kimi's decision to cynically exploit her in whatever agenda they're pursuing over there at the moment has tipped her right over the edge. Jeff just has to wind her up with a Skype message or a once-annual Cracky post and she'll go running on all year like a headless chicken, filling the board up with her silly personal obsessions like this Luka Magnotti fantasy of hers and calling it "the Crackyverse". As we know, I don't give a shit about Cracky, but it DOES kind of get my goat to see her and her five or six trained morons regurgitating whatever nonsense she's put at the top of that week's regurgitation menu and then congratulating themselves on being "Crackyfags".

>>28

The second half of that post was just too funny.

I didn't know you were one of the people responsible for the creation of room101. I'm glad you started that flame-war. Without Room101, all the pointless shit that I saw there on occasions I visited it would have been in Crackyhouse and they would have to be filtered through to browse the site comfortably.

The diminished post frequency on CH right now makes up for the lack of a Room101 though.

>>28

>I know that everyone who uses this board will be absolutely GAGGING to hear this

dont' know; dont' care.

You're retarded, and not in the nice endearing way. Fuck off.

>>28

Why don't you go get a real bird instead of creeping out young impressionable girls on the internet, you sad old wank?

>>31
Sorry, I'm not very adept with the cutting and pasting business, so if one of you who is could maybe highlight the phrase "young, impressionable girls" in post no 29 and the WHOLE of post no 28 in some appropriate manner, you'd be doing the whole Internet a service.

One or the other of them surely HAS to be the odds-on favourite for winning the Things Retarded Summerfags Say Award 2012.

"I know that everyone who uses this board will be absolutely GAGGING to hear this...", yeah, "bro", looks like you might have caught me out in a slight INACCURACY there....Thank God we have someone with your keen eye and penetrating intelligence to point these things out...I'm sure everyone else who read that took it as absolute gospel truth.

And Lia as a "young, impressionable girl"? Maybe it's me that's showing myself up as being tone-deaf to irony by mocking THAT remark because, yeah, I mean surely NO ONE could be so stupid as to sincerely want to describe this tirelessly self-publicizing, mass-murderer-groupie hobby whore as "INNOCENT"?

>>32
Sorry. My apologies to the poster of no 29, who "justly thinks and hath most rightly said" ("Hamlet").

I'm terrible at cross-referencing - but I'm sure you all get - and are GAGGING to know - which posts I was referring to.

Easy enough to sort out: Alex, nobody gives a shit about the problems you have at CH. Go settle them there and shut the fuck up about it here, you overeducated functional idiot.

Whatever passes for a Crackyfag at CH is CH's problem. It's not going to get solved here, especially not under your impetus.

From my point of view, you're gagging on your own ego to give a spectacle.

So, bravo, but get off it. As spectacles goes, I'm sure you can do better..

Suffering rejection from a handful of young females on CH must be really distressing, to an old man with no prospects of ever seeing a vagina again without paying. TBH I liked Alexs' tearful goodbyes better than his tl;dr nonsense... but like a dog returning to its' own vomit, so a fool repeats his folly. Now FOYCPW.

>>35 whatever spam-bot nigger, like your pop flinging is soooo edifying.

>>36

YOU go give him the sex he craves so badly then, faggot. I hear he's not fussy...

>>36 lrn2 internet. 35 is not the nigger spam bot. If you haven't been around bounceme long enough to know who 35 actually is by his writing, then lurk more or shut the fuck up.

>>38 poop flinger, nigger, monk. No feckin' difference mate.

>>37 clearly you're gagging for him, I insist, after you.

>ugly

No.

>>40

oh shit

>>40
Does it really matter who 35 is, or how many he is, or whatever?

This person / these people have been setting up the same cowardly win/win situation for themselves for about four years now:

We hate Alex (possibly because he pointed out a spelling mistake or a factual error in one of our posts three and a half years ago, when we were waxing particularly lyrical and pretentious and going on about "Ying and Yang" or something equally nonsensical, and we've been gnawing and chewing at our little bone of fury about the injury to our vanity ever since)

If he keeps coming back to somewhere where he is bitterly and eternally hated, we've won, because he keeps coming back.

If he gives in to our endlessly repeated hysterical screeches about him fucking off forever cos we hate him, we've ALSO woon, because he's gone away.

None of this really matters. I bang off a few lines here and there when I have a spare moment and will probably continue to do so. No one is doing anything else of even the slightest value or interest on either of the Cracky boards anyway, so if my posts give one or two of you a giggle, then that's all to the good.

The hope of any reasoned discussion or clarification of anything here is obviously a vain one anyway, as is evidenced by post 40, where some guy appears to be "defending" Lia against the charge that she is "ugly" - a charge which, as far as I am aware, was never made in this thread, and certainly never by me. (On the contrary, I said I found her "fairly attractive").

Of course, NO ONE could possibly find Lia anywhere near as attractive as she finds herself to be. The reason why she is such a disruptive and negative factor in the "Cracky community", such as it is, is that she has consistently, for about four years now, had this knack of gathering idiotic little adulatory "fanboys" - and one or two plain, insecure little "fangirls" too, I suppose - around herself who divide their time between marathons of tedious repetitive praise of her and insane, hate-spitting attacks on people they deludedly believe have called her "ugly" or otherwise failed to give her her supposedly limitless due.

The first time round with the "Lia Gang", three years ago, my inclination was not to blame Lia herself for any of that and to see her as a victim of her own tendency to attract the adulation of vicious assholes.

This time round, there is no longer any doubt in my mind that Lia encourages it and actively recruits these idiots. She absolutely relishes her new status as "Queen of Crackyhouse" (sorry to break it to you, dearie, but the only reason you're "Queen" is because, apart from your Somewhat Less Attractive and Consequently Pathetically Subservient Best Girlfriend, you're the only person with a cunt who now bothers to go within a mile of the place) and is clearly now labouring under the insane megalomaniac delusion that it is her manifest destiny to set to rights the lives of everyone who has ever been associated with the Crackyverse.

The only people more culpable here than this poor narcissistic little girl are Jeff and Kimi, who are both of them fairly intelligent people and are surely aware how easily she can be pushed into an egomaniac fantasy world but continue to push her in that direction anyway by turning up in the Crackyhouse Tinychat once a year and telling her "Aaaah, you're so cute, little sweetie, we wuv you, we weally weally do...." - which promptly has the effect of charging up her self-righteousness batteries for another year or so and sends her charging across the Crackyverse, witb her six or seven loyal arse-lickers behind her, proclaiming herself to be the New Messiah.

>>40

She looks like she somehow aged 15 years in a few weeks.

>>43
Not at all she looks 19 to me.

Alex, do you ever take a break from being a mad cunt? Maybe you should.

>>45
Mr. 45, do you ever even make the attempt to incorporate into your attacks on my posts anything that would even distantly resemble a substantial point or argument and that would raise them above the level of yet another empty boring variation on "I don't like you, fuck off"?

It's rather sad to see that, in four or five years of tireless, uninterrupted, egomaniac empire-building, Lia has STILL not been able to attract a single ass-kisser of an intellectual calibre superior to such monosyllabic one-trick ponies as the unfortunate "Stig", or shallow, imitative, universally self-ingratiating sycophants as the egregiously misnamed "Science".

I think it may be the disappointment of the hopes that she entertained, during our short period of sado-masochistic flirtation, of having at last angled herself a "Liafag" of a rather better quality than the other shabby little mediocrities who make up her "gang" that explains her current insatiable fury and bitterness.

>>46

If you can kill a man with one bullet, why waste ammo? FOYCPW.

>>47
I realize that, on THIS board, I'm chancing my arm a bit, to say the least, by asking this. But, just out of interest, how many people consider me, and the ideas I have put forward in this thread, to have been even remotely "killed" by anything that anyone has (if you can even call it this) "posted in response" to them?

I certainly wouldn't consider myself to have "killed" you by posting something like "you smell of poo, I'm not listening, nah nah nah naaaaa nah!!!"

And yet you appear to believe that "victory" really is that easy.

Any comments from anyone on this question?

No samefagging, please. I never samefag and - gentlemen as I know you all to be - I hope I can expect the same from you.

Lia is irrelevant, has nothing to do with Cracky, who gives a shit about anything to do with her.

>>49
Somebody asked me a question (see post 29), I answered it.

You're surely not going to pretend that there is anything else of any interest at all going on on this board, or on any Cracky board, at the moment. All you have here is an endless tedious alternation of one idiot posting fat nigger women and another idiot posting the same years-old photo of Cracky with "I love her" written next to it. And all you have on Crackyhouse is Lia and her three bffs swapping pictures of cuddly toys and serial killers.

Shut the fucking boards down if you don't want people to come along and use them for their harmless amusement.

>>48

OK... it was not by using one word answers or acronyms, but one of my recent victories as a troll was to convince some person to change all his locks and buy a gun as he was convinced 450,000 pedophiles were going to kidnap his children. He now lives in a state of constant fear. I admit it's not the same as killing someone, but still, quite satisfying. If you have any similar tales for our delectation, please share...

>>51
Pedophile pranking, eh?

That's what makes me despair of ever being able to compete with you seasoned /b/tard guys when it comes to original lines of wit and humour.

I mean, who ever thought of making pedophilia the subject of irreverent, iconoclastic, off-the-wall japery on the Internet before?

It must really be true what they say. Guys like you are this generation's Marxs, Lenins and Mao Zedong's. The Establishment is trembling in its boots worrying about what your crazily original minds are going to come up with next - and the day of old farts like me, who insist on holding to forms of resistance and rebellion that DON'T involve whipping out the "Look! Naked Five-Year-Olds!" ace-in-the-hole every fifteen minutes, is definitively past.

>>50

I beg to differ, in regards to your estimation of my intelligence, I am not an idiot, I'm actually a quite intelligent person, but I refuse to try prove this to some stranger on the internet, or boast about my education to you. HOWEVER, I DO love Cracky, regardless of how old that pic is. It was chosen completely at random, the laws of chance guided my hand and this was the happy result. So, suck my dick and cry.

"Swapping pictures of cuddly toys and serial killers." Where are these toys? Luka killed one person and we aren't swapping photos. I bet you wish everything was about you, Alex. I bet it pains you to see other people getting attention.

>>50

>Somebody asked me a question (see post 29)

What. I didn't ask you a question. Just stated a few things.

Hey Alex, just fuck off.

Nobody cares what you think of Crackyfags or of what they do.

Seriously, you're just a troll who has overstayed his welcome, and everybody here including you knows it.

And in your commie analogy, you're the anti-revisionist Mao clinging to the old Marxist permanent revolution in the face of detente. As I always said, for an educated guy, you sure are dumb.

Anyway, gb2 CH, over there it's funny, here, it's just noise.

Jus' Sayin'