I just want to hold her while she games. Maybe lay my head in her lap. Take in the musky smell of her sweat. ;_;

>>2 Do you have any idea how creepy you sound? You are the reason Cracky ran away.

I just really want to see what she looks like now, what she's doing these days, and how her life has been since.

vericode: koming

>>4

'Sup, guess you haven't seen CH. Is it really Cracky?
IDK, I can't say for sure.

The Sky Queen. I want her to open the bathroom door in my office when I'm taking a shit and so suddenly have an epiphany.

Then I go through the threshold holding her hand and it'd be no more an office but empty space lost in the vastness of the Universe, full of stars and comets and shit

>>5 RU really that much of an idiot, or, much more likely, are you just trolling?

Multifail.

>>7
No, I'm afraid CH really has sunk that low.

The users of Jeff's board now consist of two categories of people:

(i) those who are openly and unashamedly completely indifferent to Cracky, like that fat nigger who stated there the other day that there is nothing wrong with a board called "Crackyhouse" being full of photos of random Chan girls because "she's called Crackychan, or am I missing something?"

(ii) those who stumbled onto Crackyhouse three weeks ago and have managed vaguely to pick up something about it's being kind of cool and edge-y to be "obsessed" about a fifteen-year-old girl - apparently ANY fifteen-year-old girl, as long as it isn't absolutely IMPOSSIBLE that she is Cracky by reason of her being black, Chinese, having a third eye in the middle of her forehead, or whatever. (The "successor generation" of "hardcore Crackyfags" proudly emerging on Jeff's board have not quite mastered ALL the lore assembled by their predecessors yet, so it appears to be escaping them, just for the moment, that the fact that a girl is fifteen is enough in itself to make it absolutely impossible that she is Cracky, but I'm sure they'll master that in time).

I presume we're going to see more and more of this mockery and pollution of an existing culture by ignorant, novelty-seeking idiots for as long as Jeff keeps operating his board under the now-100%-misleading name of "Crackyhouse" and keeps humouring the five or six Liafags who form his only "fan-base" in their delusion that they have anything at all to do with the "Crackyverse".

I doubt if even any of said Liafags - who hopped onto the Cracky bandwagon a couple of years ago in pursuit and imitation of their chavvy little goddess and all her various fads - are ignorant enough to see any relation or resemblance between this nondescript little cam-girl and Cracky.

But thanks to Jeff's handing over of a proclaimed Cracky board to a bunch of people with little or no interest in Cracky, the kind of 13-year-old newfag who thinks he DOES see such a relation and resemblance is going to flood into what's left of the Crackyverse in greater and greater numbers.

>>8 excellent answer, thank you. Alex, is it? Or Alex's nemesis who is actually also Alex? The way to spot "either" is that the post is extraordinarily cogent and well written, particularly by bounceme standard.

At any rate, that's useful information and the most relevant post in this thread, or any of the threads started or revived in the last month.

>>9
No, thank YOU.

I have absolutely no hesitation in stating that your post also surely counts among the most cogent and well-written of all the posts by those persons speaking up in defence of Alex on Bounceme who happen also to be Alex.

Just to prove that I'm even more Alex than you are, though, I'll add that, when I look at Crackyhouse these days and then look at the Facebooks of one or two young women who used to regularly (well, one fairly regularly, the other hardly ever but she's SO lovely) grace the place with their presence, I find myself reciting to myself, with infinite melancholy (as one does) the beautiful lines of Hugo von Hoffmansthal:

Manche freilich müssen drunten sterben
wo die schweren Ruder der Schiffe streifen,
andere wohnen bei dem Steuer droben,
kennen Vogelflug und die Länder der Sterne.

Manche liegen mit immer schweren Gliedern
bei den Wurzeln des verworrenen Lebens,
anderen sind die Stühle gerichtet
bei den Sibyllen, den Königinnen,
und da sitzen sie wie zu Hause,
leichten Hauptes und leichter Hände.

LOL! No,I'm not Alex, I'm the original Chink Admiral. Thanks for the verse, I'll have to let the Google translator mangle it, as I don't have German.

Oh Lord

"She's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot."

Have fun being mutually retarded, 9&10

>>12 It might even be more convoluted, and retarded, than that. There's that German Chink about as well. Who knows how many times he's posted in this thread. His Engrish is normally easy to spot, but he seems to be improving. Perhaps he's taking an ESL course specialized for Chinks living in Germany.

>>13
"It might even be more convoluted, and retarded, than that."

No arguing with that, as you so aptly demonstrate.

>>8
First things first.

>...ignorant enough to see any relation or resemblance between this nondescript littlecam-girl and Cracky.

Actually, the resemblance is uncanny.

>so it appears to be escaping them, just for the moment, that the fact that a girl is fifteen is enough in itself to make it absolutely impossible that she i

The girl in question was never claimed to be Cracky, it's quite clearly stated that it isn't HER. OP there isn't the only person on earth capable of simple fact finding with modern internet search tools. She is not fifteen, however youthful her appearance, she's Twenty-two, 90 model vs the original 89, so if they were twins they'd be Irish twins.

Things in common with Cracky; she's a witch, you'd need wings to find her, you'd have to search high, and low to the roots of the Earth, she lived in a Crackyhouse in a cracker town.

Even with hints, I doubt one such as you could find her.

>>15
Let's assume the jumble of statements and half-statements in your post amount to three contentions.

The first is vastly open to question.

The second is simply false.

The third is largely nonsensical.

1) "Resemblance" or "non-resemblance" is obviously largely a matter of opinion. I certanly haven't studied the details of Cracky's physiognomy very closely. Other users of this board have, however, and I'm sure the majority of them would consider your claim of a "twin-like" resemblance to be hugely exaggerated.
In any case, facial resemblance or non-resemblance is hardly the point. You appear to be flirting, when you use phrases like "the roots of the earth" and "one such as you" with the whole religious/mystical culture that has grown up around Cracky. And that didn't grow up because of her face - or at least not exclusively for that reason - but because of the way she presented herself aesthetically and so on. I see no evidence of anything even distantly comparable in the photos you've posted. Just a girl who may be mildly attractive to people of certain tastes smirking inanely into a camera.

2) "The girl in question was never claimed to be Cracky, it's quite clearly stated that it isn't HER."

These statements are just false.

The two sentences composing post no 5 (which post no 7 was referring to, just as my post referred to post no 7), namely:

"Is it really Cracky?
IDK, I can't say for sure."

plainly do NOT represent a "quite clear statement that isn't her."

On the contrary, they plainly convey the idea that the person who made post no 5 thinks it COULD BE HER.
Which, as I say, is plainly impossible.

3) As to the jumble of nonsense that you cram into your last-but-one paragraph

"she's a witch, you'd need wings to find her, you'd have to search high, and low to the roots of the Earth, she lived in a Crackyhouse in a cracker town"

I think that very few, if any, of these supposed "things in common with Cracky" has ever been said of Cracky by anyone except you.

"She lived in a Crackyhouse in a cracker town" stinks particularly strongly of the ignorant newfag who discovered Jeff's disaster of a site three weeks ago and thinks that the whole Cracky thing is something cool that Lia and her best friend Mousie thought up around last February, maybe, and that you can be "part of" if you just invent some random shit and sprinkle it with phrases like "roots of the earth" and "none such as you, unbeliever".

>>15
"The girl in question was never claimed to be Cracky, it's quite clearly stated that it isn't HER."

okay, so has she done anything that's Cracky related, or is this just all something that should be discussed somewhere else (like, for example, the site where the detonation for all this toxic fallout originated) ?

>>10
(No.9) I was being sarcastic, you egotistic mongoloid. Go back to CH, were you belong; nobody wants you here. Shoo!

>>18 Why don't you get lost. Alex posts actual information, whereas you post drivel, and your attempts at humor are ham handed, at best.

Fuck off. Your mediocrity is appalling.

Alex talks to Alex about Alex.

wow, he doesn't even have to show up under false pretense anymore to leave his mark of derailed threads

so, we can all now pretend we're actually "trolling the other guy", just like "the other guy" thinks he;s trolling you, or we can drop it and contribute something nice for once (where I count nothing as "something nice")

So go forth unto the Internet; find something nice (and relevant, but all nice things things are relevant, since Cracky is sugar&spice and everything nice), and post them, and write something nice to accompany it.

Either do that, or nothing, or continue being jerks for no discernable reason, or something else entirely. The choice is up to you, but whatever you decide to do, remember I made you do it. There's no escape. So trod on, you faithful peons, and work your way to pointless nothingness or contribute to the greater glory of our Lady.

>>21
Just to create the right sympathetic and receptive atmosphere right from the start:

(i) the phrase is "under false pretenses /pretences", not "under false pretense".

(ii) it's impossible for us to "go forth UNTO the Internet", as we are already in the Internet. "Go forth INTO the Internet" might have worked, as it could be taken to mean "from this part of the Internet into other parts of it". But I imagine you felt that "into" was too ordinary a word and only something like "unto" would imbue you with the air of profundity and high intelligence that you feel you need when you set about writing something as condescending and pompous as that last post.

(iii) "The choice is up to you" is a pleonasm. The idea of something's being "up to someone" is already contained in the concept "choice", so "the choice is yours" would have been the correct formulation.

(iv) The present imperative form of "tread" is simply "tread". "Trod" is the past tense and makes no sense in this sentence.
Pseudo-biblical language is, as I said, very useful when one wants to give oneself an air of culture and intelligence without actually having either of these things. But if you really want to pull it off effectively you should try to bear in mind that early-seventeenth-century English actually had a grammar and wasn't just a lot of impressive oldey-worldy sounds randomly strung together.

So now I've won your sympathy and affection, let me say:

The thread was not "derailed". If you people here at Bounceme really are concerned to preserve and develop a "culture of Cracky", then it really is important that you tackle, at least now and again, this issue that there is a second site that declares itself to be about Cracky but isn't in fact about her at all, and that is going to be nurturing and sending out into the world, even if only in small numbers, people who will believe WITHOUT ANY ELEMENT OF "SARCASM" that girls like the girl in the photo in post 15 "are maybe" Cracky.

>>22

1. wrong
2. wrong
3. wrong
4. right, thanks for the correction

as for the rest of your post. It's ostensibly too long and I didn't read it. But I'll assume you picked "continue being jerks".

It makes me a little sad I made you do that, but it was to be expected. Enjoy your pointless nothingness!

Alex constantly proclaims himself the only honest man on these boards, making several promises that he won't post on this board.

What do you know, promises broken, more self aggrandizing bullshit smeared on the wall.

The Jew calling the Scotsman cheap.

If you really don't want him to leave stop giving him the attention he so desperately craves, like a dick in his mouth.

>>23 Again, it's you who is the actual asshole here with nothing of substance to contribute. Tedious, predictable, and off-point Alex bashing, entirely unjustified in the context of this thread, at least.

Again, fuck off. You are not in any way less pretentious or irritating than Alex, but, unlike Alex, in this thread you

1. Fail to provide any actual information
2. Fail
3. Display your inability to write in English
4. Irritate the fuck out of me

To quote James Thurber's (he's a writer) "My Life and Hard Times" (that's a book):

"You are the main problem at this univeristy."

>>24 Not all of us want him to leave. Maybe if you stopped jumping all over him simply for showing up, instead of judging the merit of specific posts, you could help solve the "problem" of Alex. When was the last time he's come in here in a pre-psychotic rage? Not since he flipped out over the "desecration" of Botticelli, eh?

Again, in the last month what has been posted here to inform any noobs about Cracky culture? Alex's one post in here tells me more actual information than the rest of it combined.

So there are people in here who appreciate Alex, please don't assume you speak for the entirety of bounceme community.

>>26
yes, all of us.

"Alex's one post in here tells me more actual information than the rest of it combined."

information about what's happening on another board and is only relevant in that context.

Maybe you're on the wrong board.

>>27

>>yes all of us.

Are you retarded? I am one of "us" and don't ever tell me which board I should or shouldn't be on, you arrogant prick.

Fuck off and fuck you. Who the fuck are you to tell anyone where to post and what to post?

>>25
"continue being jerks", indeed. Thanks for confirming my speculation, but it wasn't that hard to guess.

Enjoy you're pointless nothingness, (preferably somewhere else; but we both know that's not going to happen.)

This thread is making my dick hard. So much passive aggression and impotent rage.

>>28
Geez, please calm down. I was replying to >>26, who, through visual recognition, wants to establish himself as a recognized person on the board, i.e. not be anonymous.
That's an obvious sign a person might be better off using a board where such behaviour is encouraged and appreciated.

In here it really doesn't matter who you are. Identity breeds drama, and all drama distracts from the message.

I don't know what the message is, but I know what it's not: You. Or me, or any particular person. No need to get angry about that. Better even to accept it. You don't matter; at least not where the message is concerned.

>>28 To provide more substance, since you appear to be retarded.

>>5 put the original shitpost in here about "Cracky" on CH.

I (accurately) accused him of being retarded or a troll.

Then Alex addressed my post with background information that cleared up the matter for me.

Then >>15 waltzed in with more shitposting, featuring the "Cracky photo" in question from CH.

Then ASSHOLES like you jumped in with your mass retardation and general fucktardery to deflect attention from the REAL shitposting by dumping over Alex (for nothing at all).

You are not only a tool, you are clearly incapable of reading English, following the logic of a thread, or thinking in general.

You are a fraud. It's you, not Alex, who people would avoid at a wine and cheese mixer. Not that you've ever been within 300 miles of one eh?

>>31 the Admiral is also me, you blithering idiot. lrn2 read, lrn2 recognize a writing style, lrn2 think.

As to your "point"- actually Alex is the only person who establishes his actual identity here and he's to be commended for it.

No "anon" is not a badge of honor.

You're correct about the "message" being more important than who types it, however.

On that point- Alex's "message" in this thread was helpful and informative.

None of yours has been.

>>33
"lrn2 read, lrn2 recognize a writing style"

well, if you had a recognizable writing style, that wouldn't be a problem now, would it ? And in fact, you wouldn't need to point out your postings with visual aids either; so why accuse me of something you know not to be true ?

You're being silly; in fact, this whole thread is silly to the max. If cars could run on ego, this thread would be diamonds.

Wow, this is one confusing thread.

When are you people going to learn to ignore the Fagmaster's posts? Just ignore him, and after he realizes he can't feed his ego, he'll leave like a hungry snail devoid of nourishment.

>>36
Strangely enough his ego feeds on rejection. So the trick is to satisfy his lust for bile as quickly as possible so he leaves again.

And before you ask, no, it doesn't work the other way around; you can't starve him by being friendly and reaching out. He just keeps hanging around like a malevolent spectre incrementally douching up the place until he gets what he wants.
If you don't believe me, just read back a few dozen pages or so and see for yourself what happens when people who don't know him try to be friendly to him.

>>If cars could run on ego, this thread would be diamonds.

Well you certainly can't be accused of not having a writing style- yours could be characterized as "Incompetent."

Your clumsy mixed metaphor not only fails, utterly, on aesthetic grounds, it's semantically meaningless.

In addition, your ego is at least as huge as anyone else's on this thread or anywhere else in the world, I'd wager, you pompous, self-satisfied, insufferable faggot.

>>38
"Your clumsy mixed metaphor not only fails, utterly, on aesthetic grounds, it's semantically meaningless."

Yesss, I can't say I wasn't delighted by it as well. Semantic meaninglessness is the best kind of meaninglessness.

"In addition, your ego is at least as huge as anyone else's on this thread or anywhere else in the world, I'd wager, you pompous, self-satisfied, insufferable faggot."

No need to be petty, please. I'm sorry I insulted your writing-style. But you've got to admit that if you feel the need to prop it up with identifying pictures, even you yourself have to admit admit it might not be as distinctive as you want it to be.
Why do you feel the need to be acknowledged anyway ? And especially on here ?

Have you ever written a story and posted it here ? If so, can you link it ?

stupid.

What are you faggots talking about.

me and my crackles ;_;