>>82
Yeah, and that is, sadly, about as far as you are ever likely to get in your comprehension of that novel - which is not even especially subtle or intelligent but is certainly FAR too subtle and intelligent for YOU.
Your excitement over having found someone called Alex in a BOOK! - a BOOK teeheehee! - is obviously now going to overload the three brain cells you had left to work with and render you incapable of grasping that the whole POINT and MORAL of Burgess's novel is that the concept of "sick beings" is a specious one and that "Ludovico's Technique" is an offense against Man's essential quality of ethical responsibility.
Inb4 another stupid pointless fucking "No U" argument with semi-illiterates who claim they read the Cliff Notes on Anthony Burgess so they "know more than you do lolol I win I win"