>>16
You don't really seem to be addressing the essential issue of the entirely dishonest nature of your posts.
I.e. you attack me on something, and then, when I retort on that matter, your next post denies that you have either knowledge or, or interest in, the very matter you attacked me on.
I'm not going to do the "needle in a haystack" thing of getting involved in some argument about which "Anon" in other threads was you and which allegedly weren't.
Let's just restrict ourselves to this thread.
Whoever wrote 6 addresses "Alex" directly and sets up a scenario whereby "Alex" is giving "tokens" to some girl for sexual favours of some sort.
I'm no expert myself on whether "tokens" is a phrase and system used outside MFC or not, but I'd say that, on balance, that little scenario definitely does suggest that you have some pretty clear image in your head of me and some particular cam-whore favourite of mine engaging in this sort of transaction.
And it definitely DOESN'T harmonize very well with your sudden use, in your following post, of phrases like "this RavRav" and "an MFC".
The whole "I don't know any details about your life and I don't want to know" thing is CLEARLY just some (utterly transparent and unconvincing) POSE you adopt to try to give yourself an air of "having the advantage" over me.
I have no doubt at all that you wolf down absolutely ALL information (most of it false, of course) that you can get about me, who I give money to etc. etc. because you are clearly INFINITELY more interested in me than you are in, say, Cracky.
The definitive proof, I think, is in the simple comparison of the number of posts you have made here today about me and the number you've made about Cracky.
How many about me? 10? 20? 30 already?
And about Cracky? Did you make even ONE?
Please...cut the shit.