>>24
>It can, at best, have consisted in a years-old photo of Cracky and some such infantile three- or four-word post as "I love you Cracky" or "I want to kiss your mouth".
And indeed it was!
>I would certainly PREFER you to be indifferent to me.
Well, I'd prefer it if you'd let me be indifferent to you.
>The problem is that I DON'T see it.
That's indeed the missing part, you just don't see it.
I'm here, posting infantile three- or four-word "I love you Cracky" posts. My attention on quiet contemplation about her. And then you come by "HEY EVERYBODY. LOOKATME, I'M ALEX REYNOLDS, GIMME ATTENTION."
So naturally, I divert my attention to you. I'd much rather have made 40 great "I love you, Cracky" posts, during this time. But you, in your own inimical way, wouldn't let me.
If you think my posts puerile, no problem; hell, naybe they are.
But the solution is not writing an epos about something different entirely. The solution is to write an epos about Cracky, and post that.
When you do that you can say, "Your posts are stupid and simple. This is how you do it." And I'd probably agree with you.
But you don't do that, because "The problem is that I DON'T see it."
You just don't see it. Cracky is a stupid and we're all retards for liking it, and the stuff you're currently involved in is much more interesting so you write about that.
I don't care if it's more interesting in general, or your personal feelings on non-0cracky related matters. But still, you keep on bringing it up under flimsy pretense.